Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Affineness and finiteness of morphisms descend under fppf base change

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let p:S′→S be faithfully flat, quasi-compact, and locally of finite presentation, and f:X→S a finite-type separated morphism of Noetherian schemes. If XS′→S′ is affine, then f is affine. If that base change is finite, then f is finite.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Affine algebra descent is effective under faithful flat extension, including its maps and cocycle compatibility. Scheme morphisms descend under quasi-compact fppf covers. (Faithfully flat descent of modules and affine algebras is effective, Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent)

[F2]

Finite generation of modules descends under faithful flat extension; spectra turn algebra isomorphisms into affine scheme isomorphisms. (Finite generation descends along faithfully flat ring maps, Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings)

Proof

Given: AC, p, f, and the stated affine or finite base change.

1.1F1F2givenconstruct

Work over an affine open U=Spec⁡A⊂S. Choose finitely many affine opens covering SU′; their disjoint union is affine, V=Spec⁡B, and is a faithfully flat affine cover of U. The pullback XV is affine over V, say Spec⁡C. Its two pullbacks to V×UV have the canonical isomorphism coming from the scheme XU, and satisfy the cocycle. By [F1], C descends to an A-algebra D, with D⊗AB≅C as algebras with datum.

2.1F1F2step 1.1construct

This algebra isomorphism gives a compatible isomorphism XV≅(Spec⁡D)V. The map from XV to Spec⁡D descends along XV→XU by the morphism part of [F1], and the inverse map descends along (Spec⁡D)V→Spec⁡D. The resulting two maps are inverse because their composites become identities after the faithful cover and uniqueness in [F1] detects equality. Thus XU≅Spec⁡D, proving affineness of f locally on its target and hence globally.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

If fS′ is finite, C is a finite B-module. By [F2], D is a finite A-module: equivalently express finitely many generators of D⊗AB using finitely many tensor coefficients in D, let D0 be their A-span, and use faithfulness to deduce D/D0=0. Hence XU→U is finite. Finiteness is affine local on the target by this module description, so f is finite. AC is inherited from [F1]–[F2]; quasi-compactness supplies the finite affine subcover used in step 1.1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources