How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Affineness and finiteness of morphisms descend under fppf base change
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be faithfully flat, quasi-compact, and locally of finite presentation, and a finite-type separated morphism of Noetherian schemes. If is affine, then is affine. If that base change is finite, then is finite.
Facts & Assumptions
Affine algebra descent is effective under faithful flat extension, including its maps and cocycle compatibility. Scheme morphisms descend under quasi-compact fppf covers. (Faithfully flat descent of modules and affine algebras is effective, Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent)
Finite generation of modules descends under faithful flat extension; spectra turn algebra isomorphisms into affine scheme isomorphisms. (Finite generation descends along faithfully flat ring maps, Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings)
Proof
Given: AC, , , and the stated affine or finite base change.
Work over an affine open . Choose finitely many affine opens covering ; their disjoint union is affine, , and is a faithfully flat affine cover of . The pullback is affine over , say . Its two pullbacks to have the canonical isomorphism coming from the scheme , and satisfy the cocycle. By [F1], descends to an -algebra , with as algebras with datum.
This algebra isomorphism gives a compatible isomorphism . The map from to descends along by the morphism part of [F1], and the inverse map descends along . The resulting two maps are inverse because their composites become identities after the faithful cover and uniqueness in [F1] detects equality. Thus , proving affineness of locally on its target and hence globally.
If is finite, is a finite -module. By [F2], is a finite -module: equivalently express finitely many generators of using finitely many tensor coefficients in , let be their -span, and use faithfulness to deduce . Hence is finite. Finiteness is affine local on the target by this module description, so is finite. AC is inherited from [F1]–[F2]; quasi-compactness supplies the finite affine subcover used in step 1.1.
Depends on
Used by
- A flat finite-type equivalence relation has generic saturated quasi-sections Lemma
- Affine smooth and connected properties in exact sequences of algebraic groups Lemma
- Pseudo-abelian varieties under separable algebraic extension Lemma
- Barsotti-Chevalley existence over an arbitrary field, allowing nonsmooth affine kernel Theorem
- Normal subgroup quotients of finite-type group schemes exist as fppf scheme quotients Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- SGA1, Expose VIII, affine morphism and finite morphism descent (standard reference, not scraped)
- Milne, Algebraic Groups (2022), Appendix A.80 and Proposition 8.1 (standard reference, not scraped)