How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite locally free affine equivalence relations have finite locally free scheme quotients
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let and be affine finite-type schemes over a field , with an equivalence-relation groupoid whose source and target maps are finite locally free. Put Then is a finite-type -algebra, is finite locally free and onto, and the canonical map is an isomorphism. Moreover represents the fppf quotient sheaf .
Facts & Assumptions
The adjugate identity holds over every commutative ring. Nakayama, local criteria for flatness, and finite flat modules being projective hold. Flatness and vanishing descend under faithful flat extension. (For every positive-sized square matrix over a commutative ring, , Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma, A module is flat if and only if all prime localizations are flat, equivalently all maximal localizations are flat, A finite flat module over a Noetherian ring is finite projective, Flatness descends along faithfully flat base change, Descent of vanishing along a faithfully flat morphism)
Affine products have tensor-product rings, and represented functors are fppf sheaves. (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products, Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent)
Proof
Given: AC, , and the specified equivalence-relation groupoid. Write for its comorphisms.
The rank of the outgoing-relation fibre is locally constant on and constant along every relation arrow: composing with that arrow and its inverse gives mutually inverse maps between the outgoing fibres, preserving their target point. Thus the finitely many constant-rank clopen pieces of are saturated. Their defining idempotents satisfy and belong to . Split by them; it suffices to prove the claim when the two ranks have one positive constant value . Positivity follows from the identity arrow. For , take the characteristic polynomial of multiplication by on the locally free -module via . Its coefficients lie in : after either pullback to , the composition/inverse isomorphism between the two outgoing-relation fibres preserves target evaluation , so the corresponding multiplication operators are conjugate and have the same characteristic polynomial. Cayley–Hamilton holds here over the coordinate ring: locally write for the multiplication matrix . The adjugate identity in [F1] yields , , and ; multiplying by successive powers of and adding telescopes to . This identity glues for the locally free module. Follow it by the identity-arrow map to obtain a monic equation for over .
Hence is integral over . Since is generated by finitely many elements over , it is a finite -module. Also is a finite-type -algebra: choose finite -module generators of , express their products, the unit, and finite -algebra generators of in this generating family. Let be generated over by those finitely many coefficients. The -span of the contains the unit and algebra generators and is closed under multiplication, so equals . The Noetherian ring makes its submodule finite over . Thus is finite type and Noetherian. Injective integrality makes onto by lying-over.
The map is finite: its graph into is closed, and the map of that product to is the base change of one finite projection. It is a monomorphism by the equivalence-relation assumption. A finite monomorphism is a closed immersion here: after any residue-field base change its affine coordinate algebra has diagonal multiplication an isomorphism; finite dimension gives , so is zero or the residue field. Nakayama applied to the finite cokernel of the original ring map then gives surjectivity. Consequently , , is onto.
Localize at any prime of and faithfully flat extend this local ring, if necessary, to , whose residue field is the infinite field . Formation of as the kernel of commutes with this flat extension. The extended is finite over the local extended , so is semilocal, and is finite projective of rank over via . Such a module is free: choose residue-field bases at the finitely many maximal ideals, lift them simultaneously by the Chinese remainder theorem, use Nakayama to obtain a surjection , split it by projectivity, and apply Nakayama to its finite kernel.
In this semilocal situation, the -submodule generates as an -module by step 3.1. It contains an -basis of . To prove this, reduce modulo the Jacobson radical of and consider the finitely many residue-field vector spaces of dimension . Choose finitely many elements of which generate over . Because the residue field of is infinite and maps into every residue field of , a linear combination with coefficients in that common field can be chosen nonzero in every factor: each forbidden condition is a proper linear subspace, and finitely many such subspaces cannot cover a vector space over an infinite field. Lift the coefficients to . The resulting element generates a free direct summand of rank one, by Nakayama and the splitting argument of step 3.2. Apply the same argument to the quotient, and induct on . Lifting the quotient basis elements from gives a basis of over .
Write , with . Let be the composition comorphism. The groupoid identities give and . Comparing composition of the displayed expansion with its first-factor pullback, and using , gives . Since the are a basis in the first tensor factor, all lie in . Applying the identity-arrow map shows . Independence follows by applying and the basis independence in . Therefore , and the surjection in step 3.1 is an isomorphism, since it takes the corresponding basis in the second tensor factor to .
The conclusions in step 5.1 descend to each local ring of the original by faithful flatness in [F1]. Thus is an isomorphism globally, and is flat over . It is finite and finitely presented over the Noetherian , so is finite locally free by [F1]. It is faithful because its spectrum is onto by step 2.1. The kernel pair is now exactly . Every morphism into lifts after base change by the finite locally free covering ; any two local lifts differ by the kernel pair. Since is an fppf sheaf by [F2], these statements identify it with the fppf quotient sheaf. Recombine the saturated rank pieces from step 1.1 to finish. AC is inherited from [F1] and the prime/basis selections.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent
- For every positive-sized square matrix over a commutative ring, $A\operatorname{adj}(A)=\operatorname{adj}(A)A=\det(A)I$
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma
- A finite flat module over a Noetherian ring is finite projective
- A module is flat if and only if all prime localizations are flat, equivalently all maximal localizations are flat
- Flatness descends along faithfully flat base change
- Descent of vanishing along a faithfully flat morphism
- Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Proposition 39.23.9 and Lemma 39.23.8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Lemma 10.78.8, semilocal basis selection (standard reference, not scraped)
- SGA3, Expose V, Theorem 4.1 (affine case) (standard reference, not scraped)