Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite locally free affine equivalence relations have finite locally free scheme quotients

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let U=Spec⁡A and R=Spec⁡B be affine finite-type schemes over a field k, with an equivalence-relation groupoid (R⇉U) whose source and target maps s,t are finite locally free. Put C={a∈A:s∗(a)=t∗(a)}. Then C is a finite-type k-algebra, U→M=Spec⁡C is finite locally free and onto, and the canonical map R→U×MU is an isomorphism. Moreover M represents the fppf quotient sheaf U/R.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

Given: AC, A,B,k, and the specified equivalence-relation groupoid. Write s,t:A→B for its comorphisms.

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

The rank of the outgoing-relation fibre is locally constant on U and constant along every relation arrow: composing with that arrow and its inverse gives mutually inverse maps between the outgoing fibres, preserving their target point. Thus the finitely many constant-rank clopen pieces of U are saturated. Their defining idempotents satisfy s(e)=t(e) and belong to C. Split by them; it suffices to prove the claim when the two ranks have one positive constant value r. Positivity follows from the identity arrow. For a∈A, take the characteristic polynomial of multiplication by t(a) on the locally free A-module B via s. Its coefficients lie in C: after either pullback to R, the composition/inverse isomorphism between the two outgoing-relation fibres preserves target evaluation t(a), so the corresponding multiplication operators are conjugate and have the same characteristic polynomial. Cayley–Hamilton holds here over the coordinate ring: locally write adj⁡(ZI−T)=∑j=0r−1BjZj for the multiplication matrix T. The adjugate identity in [F1] yields −TB0=c0I, Bj−1−TBj=cjI, and Br−1=I; multiplying by successive powers of T and adding telescopes to ∑j=0rcjTj=0. This identity glues for the locally free module. Follow it by the identity-arrow map B→A to obtain a monic equation for a over C.

2.1step 1.1algebraconstruct

Hence A is integral over C. Since A is generated by finitely many elements over k⊂C, it is a finite C-module. Also C is a finite-type k-algebra: choose finite C-module generators αj of A, express their products, the unit, and finite k-algebra generators of A in this generating family. Let C0⊂C be generated over k by those finitely many coefficients. The C0-span of the αj contains the unit and algebra generators and is closed under multiplication, so equals A. The Noetherian ring C0 makes its submodule C⊂A finite over C0. Thus C is finite type and Noetherian. Injective integrality makes Spec⁡A→Spec⁡C onto by lying-over.

3.1F1F2step 2.1algebra

The map j:R→U×U is finite: its graph into R×U is closed, and the map of that product to U×U is the base change of one finite projection. It is a monomorphism by the equivalence-relation assumption. A finite monomorphism is a closed immersion here: after any residue-field base change its affine coordinate algebra D has diagonal multiplication D⊗D→D an isomorphism; finite dimension gives (dim⁡D)2=dim⁡D, so D is zero or the residue field. Nakayama applied to the finite cokernel of the original ring map then gives surjectivity. Consequently A⊗CA→B, a⊗b↦s(a)t(b), is onto.

3.2F1step 1.1step 2.1algebraconstruct

Localize at any prime of C and faithfully flat extend this local ring, if necessary, to C[T]mC[T], whose residue field is the infinite field κ(m)(T). Formation of C as the kernel of s−t commutes with this flat extension. The extended A is finite over the local extended C, so is semilocal, and B is finite projective of rank r over A via s. Such a module is free: choose residue-field bases at the finitely many maximal ideals, lift them simultaneously by the Chinese remainder theorem, use Nakayama to obtain a surjection Ar→B, split it by projectivity, and apply Nakayama to its finite kernel.

4.1F1step 3.1step 3.2algebrachoose

In this semilocal situation, the C-submodule t(A) generates B as an s(A)-module by step 3.1. It contains an A-basis of B. To prove this, reduce modulo the Jacobson radical of A and consider the finitely many residue-field vector spaces of dimension r. Choose finitely many elements of t(A) which generate B over A. Because the residue field of C is infinite and maps into every residue field of A, a linear combination with coefficients in that common field can be chosen nonzero in every factor: each forbidden condition is a proper linear subspace, and finitely many such subspaces cannot cover a vector space over an infinite field. Lift the coefficients to C. The resulting element generates a free direct summand of rank one, by Nakayama and the splitting argument of step 3.2. Apply the same argument to the quotient, and induct on r. Lifting the quotient basis elements from t(A) gives a basis t(x1),…,t(xr) of B over s(A).

5.1F2step 3.2step 4.1algebra

Write t(a)=∑is(ci)t(xi), with ci∈A. Let c:B→B⊗s,A,tB be the composition comorphism. The groupoid identities give c(t(a))=t(a)⊗1 and c(s(a))=1⊗s(a). Comparing composition of the displayed expansion with its first-factor pullback, and using s(ci)⊗1=1⊗t(ci), gives ∑it(xi)⊗(s(ci)−t(ci))=0. Since the t(xi) are a basis in the first tensor factor, all ci lie in C. Applying the identity-arrow map shows a=∑icixi. Independence follows by applying t and the basis independence in B. Therefore A=⨁iCxi, and the surjection in step 3.1 is an isomorphism, since it takes the corresponding basis in the second tensor factor to t(xi).

6.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 5.1∎

The conclusions in step 5.1 descend to each local ring of the original C by faithful flatness in [F1]. Thus A⊗CA→B is an isomorphism globally, and A is flat over C. It is finite and finitely presented over the Noetherian C, so is finite locally free by [F1]. It is faithful because its spectrum is onto by step 2.1. The kernel pair is now exactly R. Every morphism into M lifts after base change by the finite locally free covering U→M; any two local lifts differ by the kernel pair. Since M is an fppf sheaf by [F2], these statements identify it with the fppf quotient sheaf. Recombine the saturated rank pieces from step 1.1 to finish. AC is inherited from [F1] and the prime/basis selections.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources