How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite locally free equivalence quotients exist when orbits lie in affine opens
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a finite locally free equivalence-relation groupoid on a separated finite-type -scheme. Suppose every orbit is contained in an affine open of . Its fppf quotient is represented by a separated finite-type scheme , the quotient map is finite locally free and onto, and .
Facts & Assumptions
An affine-contained orbit has a saturated affine open neighbourhood. On a saturated affine open the quotient exists and is finite locally free with the prescribed kernel pair. (Finite equivalence relations have saturated affine neighbourhoods around affine-contained orbits, Finite locally free affine equivalence relations have finite locally free scheme quotients)
Represented scheme functors satisfy fppf descent. (Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent)
Proof
Given: AC, , and the affine-orbit condition.
By [F1], cover by saturated affine opens and let be their affine finite locally free quotients. For each intersection , its image under is open, since finite locally free maps are open, and its inverse image is exactly the intersection by saturation. That open represents the quotient of the restricted relation, by [F2] and the local lifting/kernel-pair description. The corresponding open in represents the same sheaf, so is uniquely isomorphic. These isomorphisms satisfy the cocycle identity by uniqueness; glue the along them to a scheme .
The local quotient maps glue. Finite local freeness is local on the target, so is finite locally free and onto, and the local kernel-pair isomorphisms give . Since every target point lifts after the covering , and two lifts agree in the quotient precisely when related by that kernel pair, [F2] identifies with the fppf quotient. A finite affine subcover of by the gives a finite affine cover of by finite-type -algebras, so is finite type.
The image of the closed diagonal of under the finite closed map is the diagonal of as a subset, since is onto. Thus that diagonal has closed image. A finite-type -scheme is locally separated: around every point of its diagonal, choose an affine open containing the point, and the restriction of the diagonal to is closed. Hence its diagonal is an immersion; closed image makes this immersion closed, by checking the affine quotient ideals on those neighbourhoods and the open complement of the image. Therefore is separated. AC is inherited from [F1]–[F2].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- SGA3, Expose V, Theorem 4.1 and Section 5.b (standard reference, not scraped)
- Milne, Algebraic Groups (2022), Appendix B.26 (standard reference, not scraped)