Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite locally free equivalence quotients exist when orbits lie in affine opens

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let R⇉X be a finite locally free equivalence-relation groupoid on a separated finite-type k-scheme. Suppose every orbit is contained in an affine open of X. Its fppf quotient is represented by a separated finite-type scheme Y, the quotient map X→Y is finite locally free and onto, and R=X×YX.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

An affine-contained orbit has a saturated affine open neighbourhood. On a saturated affine open the quotient exists and is finite locally free with the prescribed kernel pair. (Finite equivalence relations have saturated affine neighbourhoods around affine-contained orbits, Finite locally free affine equivalence relations have finite locally free scheme quotients)

[F2]

Represented scheme functors satisfy fppf descent. (Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent)

Proof

Given: AC, X,R, and the affine-orbit condition.

1.1F1F2givenconstruct

By [F1], cover X by saturated affine opens Wi and let Yi be their affine finite locally free quotients. For each intersection Wi∩Wj, its image under Wi→Yi is open, since finite locally free maps are open, and its inverse image is exactly the intersection by saturation. That open represents the quotient of the restricted relation, by [F2] and the local lifting/kernel-pair description. The corresponding open in Yj represents the same sheaf, so is uniquely isomorphic. These isomorphisms satisfy the cocycle identity by uniqueness; glue the Yi along them to a scheme Y.

2.1F1F2step 1.1construct

The local quotient maps glue. Finite local freeness is local on the target, so q:X→Y is finite locally free and onto, and the local kernel-pair isomorphisms give R=X×YX. Since every target point lifts after the covering q, and two lifts agree in the quotient precisely when related by that kernel pair, [F2] identifies Y with the fppf quotient. A finite affine subcover of X by the Wi gives a finite affine cover of Y by finite-type k-algebras, so Y is finite type.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The image of the closed diagonal of X under the finite closed map q×q is the diagonal of Y as a subset, since q is onto. Thus that diagonal has closed image. A finite-type k-scheme is locally separated: around every point of its diagonal, choose an affine open T containing the point, and the restriction of the diagonal to T×T is closed. Hence its diagonal is an immersion; closed image makes this immersion closed, by checking the affine quotient ideals on those neighbourhoods and the open complement of the image. Therefore Y is separated. AC is inherited from [F1]–[F2].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources