How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Flat finite-presentation morphisms are open
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC). Let be a morphism of schemes that is flat (Flat morphism of schemes) and locally of finite presentation (Locally finite presentation morphisms). Then is universally open (Open and universally open morphisms of schemes); in particular is open. No further hypothesis is imposed on , or .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data and hypotheses displayed in the Statement, with the conventions fixed there.
A morphism is flat at when is flat over along the induced local homomorphism, and flat when this holds at every point; a morphism with empty source is flat (Flat morphism of schemes).
A morphism is locally of finite presentation at when there are affine opens and with , and a finitely presented ring map; is locally of finite presentation when this holds at every point (Locally finite presentation morphisms).
A morphism of schemes is open when its underlying map of topological spaces is an open map, and universally open when every base-changed projection over an arbitrary is open (Open and universally open morphisms of schemes).
For affine charts , with the morphism is flat at every point of if and only if is flat over ; in particular is flat if and only if is flat (Affine-local flatness).
Assume AC. If is a finitely presented ring map and , then the image of the distinguished open under is a constructible subset of (Constructible images for finite-presentation affine maps).
Assume AC. Let be constructible. If is stable under specialisation then is closed, and if is stable under generalisation then is open (Constructible subsets stable under generalisation are open in an affine spectrum).
Assume AC. A flat ring homomorphism satisfies going down: given primes of and contracting to , there exists with (Every flat ring map satisfies going down).
Every localisation is flat, and a composite of flat ring homomorphisms is flat (Every localization is flat, and localizing a flat module preserves flatness, Flatness is transitive under a flat change of rings).
Flatness of morphisms is stable under arbitrary base change, and so is local finite presentation (Flatness is stable under arbitrary base change, Local finiteness conditions under base change).
For an -scheme and a morphism the base change is the fibre product with structure map the second projection (Base change of objects, morphisms and properties).
For a ring the distinguished opens form a basis of the topology of (The underlying space of an affine spectrum).
The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
We first prove the affine claim: if is a flat homomorphism of finite presentation, then is open. Fix and let be the image of the distinguished open under the map of spectra.
Now let be flat and locally of finite presentation. Cover by affine opens such that for affine opens with of finite presentation, as [F2] allows; by [F4] and flatness of each is flat.
The homomorphism is flat: is flat by hypothesis, the localisation is flat by [F8], and a composite of flat ring homomorphisms is flat by [F8].
By [F5] the set is constructible in .
The set is stable under generalisation. Let and let be a prime of . Choose with . Since , the prime determines a prime contracting to , and [F7] applied to the flat homomorphism of step 2.1 produces with ; as the prime defines a point of lying over , so .
By step 2.2 the set is constructible and by step 3.1 it is stable under generalisation, so [F6] shows that is open in . Since was arbitrary, the image of every distinguished open of is open.
Every open subset of is a union of distinguished opens by [F11], and the image of a union is the union of the images, so by step 4.1 the image of every open subset of is open in . This proves the affine claim that is open.
For each the affine claim of step 5.1 makes the restriction open, hence also the map is open in the sense of [F3], since is open in .
Consequently is open: for an open one has , so , and each is open in by step 6.1 applied to the open subset , which is exactly the openness required of by [F3].
Finally let be an arbitrary morphism and form the base change of [F10]. By [F9] the morphism is again flat and locally of finite presentation, so step 7.1 applies to and shows that is open. As was arbitrary, is universally open by the definition recorded in [F3]. The Axiom of Choice [F12] is used exactly through [F5], [F6] and [F7], each invoked above. [F3, F9, F10, F12, step 7.1]
Depends on
- Flat morphism of schemes
- Locally finite presentation morphisms
- Open and universally open morphisms of schemes
- Affine-local flatness
- Constructible images for finite-presentation affine maps
- Constructible subsets stable under generalisation are open in an affine spectrum
- Every flat ring map satisfies going down
- Every localization is flat, and localizing a flat module preserves flatness
- Flatness is transitive under a flat change of rings
- Flatness is stable under arbitrary base change
- Local finiteness conditions under base change
- Base change of objects, morphisms and properties
- The underlying space of an affine spectrum
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Lemma 29.26.10 (tag 01UA) and Section 29.24 (tags 01U0, 01U1) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Commutative Algebra, Section 10.41 (tags 00HY, 00I0, 00I1) (standard reference, not scraped)