Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An étale universally injective morphism is an open immersion

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). If a morphism of schemes f:X→Y is étale (Étale morphism of schemes) and universally injective, then it is an open immersion (Open immersions of schemes). It is enough for universal injectivity that f be injective on underlying points and induce an isomorphism κ(f(x))→∼κ(x) for every x∈X. No separatedness or quasi-compactness of f or Y is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An étale morphism f:X→Y and either of the injectivity hypotheses in the Statement.

[F1]

Étale morphisms are flat, locally of finite presentation and unramified (Étale equals flat and unramified in finite presentation, Étale morphism of schemes). An unramified morphism has an open diagonal (An unramified morphism has an open diagonal). A flat, locally finitely presented morphism is open (Flat finite-presentation morphisms are open).

[F2]

A flat affine ring map is faithfully flat when its map on spectra is surjective (A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when it detects proper ideals and is surjective on spectra). Faithful flatness implies injectivity of the ring map and detects a zero module after tensoring (Every faithfully flat ring map is injective, For a flat module, faithful flatness is equivalent to detecting nonzero modules and residue fields).

[F3]

Points in a fibre product over a pair of points are primes of the tensor product of their residue fields (Points of a fibre product via residue-field tensors).

[F4]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed (The Axiom of Choice); it is inherited through the published flat-openness and faithful-flatness suppliers in [F1] and [F2].

Proof

technique · identify the diagonal, then prove that a surjective flat open monomorphism is an isomorphism on small affine target opens
1.1F3

First suppose that f is injective on points and every residue-field map is an isomorphism. After any base change T→Y and for any t∈T with image y, a point of (X×YT)t lies over some x∈f−1(y) and, by [F3], corresponds to a prime of κ(x)⊗κ(y)κ(t). There is at most one such x; if it exists, the tensor product is κ(t) and has one prime. Hence every base change of f is injective on points, which is universal injectivity.

1.2F1

Now assume universal injectivity. By [F1], f is unramified, so its diagonal Δ:X→X×YX is an open immersion. Base-change f along itself: the projection p1:X×YX→X is injective on points by universal injectivity. The diagonal is a section of p1, so it supplies a point in every nonempty fibre of p1; injectivity makes that the only point in each fibre. Hence Δ is surjective on points. A surjective open immersion is an isomorphism, so Δ is an isomorphism and f is a monomorphism.

2.1F1F2step 1.2

By [F1], f is open. Put U=f(X)⊆Y, an open subscheme; then f:X→U is surjective, flat, locally of finite presentation and a monomorphism. Fix y∈U and its unique preimage x. Choose an affine open V=Spec⁡A⊆U around y and an affine open W=Spec⁡B⊆f−1(V) around x. Because f is open, f(W) is an open neighbourhood of y in V. Choose a principal open D(a)⊆f(W) containing y. Since f is injective on points, every point of f−1(D(a)) already lies in W, so f−1(D(a))=W∩f−1(D(a))=Spec⁡Bf#(a). The induced affine map Aa→Bf#(a) is flat and surjective on spectra, hence faithfully flat by [F2].

3.1F2step 1.2step 2.1

Abbreviate the rings of step 2.1 by A′→B′. Because f is a monomorphism, its diagonal over D(a) is an isomorphism, so the multiplication map μ:B′⊗A′B′→B′ is an isomorphism. By [F2], A′→B′ is injective; let C=B′/A′. Tensoring the exact sequence 0→A′→B′→C→0 with the flat A′-module B′ gives 0⟶B′→b↦1⊗bB′⊗A′B′⟶C⊗A′B′⟶0. The first map is inverse to μ, hence an isomorphism. Thus C⊗A′B′=0; faithful flatness detects zero modules by [F2], so C=0 and A′→B′ is an isomorphism. The resulting principal opens D(a) cover U as y varies, and f is an isomorphism over each of them. Therefore f:X→∼U↪Y is an open immersion.

4.1

Step 1.1 proves the residue-field criterion for universal injectivity; steps 1.2--3.1 prove the principal assertion. The proof makes only finitely many local chart choices at each point. The declared Axiom of Choice enters through the published suppliers identified in [F4]. [F1, F2, F3, F4, step 1.1, step 1.2, step 3.1] □

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources