How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Integral quasi-coherent algebras over qcqs bases are unions of finite subalgebras
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC). Let be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme (Quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes) and let be an integral affine-local quasi-coherent -algebra (Affine-local quasi-coherent algebras before general sheaf theory). Then is the filtered union of its finite quasi-coherent -subalgebras: every finite set of local sections of over affine opens, together with finitely many monic integrality certificates for them, is contained in a single finite quasi-coherent subalgebra once the sections are read on a finite affine cover.
'Integral' and 'finite' are the affine-local conditions of Affine-local quasi-coherent algebras before general sheaf theory: on every affine open, the algebra is the module-associated sheaf of an integral, respectively a module-finite, algebra over the section ring. This is part (1) of Stacks Project, Properties of Schemes, Lemma 28.23.13 (tag 0817). The qcqs sheaf extension argument needed for this claim is proved explicitly below.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data and hypotheses displayed in the Statement, with the conventions fixed there.
Assume the Axiom of Choice; it is used in this item only to choose finite affine covers and finite generating sets (The Axiom of Choice).
is quasi-compact when every open cover has a finite subcover and quasi-separated when the intersection of two quasi-compact opens is quasi-compact; in particular a quasi-compact scheme with affine diagonal has a finite affine open cover with all pairwise intersections quasi-compact (Quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes).
An affine-local quasi-coherent -algebra restricts over each affine open to the module-associated sheaf of an -algebra , with restriction to given by localisation (Affine-local quasi-coherent algebras before general sheaf theory).
If an algebra is generated over its base ring by finitely many elements each of which is integral over the base, then it is module-finite over the base (A subalgebra generated by finitely many integral elements is module-finite).
Let and let be module-associated sheaves with a sheaf map induced on sections by . Naturality with restriction makes its map on each the localization . Exactness of localization (Localisation of modules is exact) gives and ; localization also commutes with finite direct sums. Therefore kernels, images and finite sums of locally module-associated sheaves are again locally module-associated, hence quasi-coherent.
Proof
Fix a finite affine open cover with each and with all intersections quasi-compact; such a cover exists by [F2]. On the algebra is for an integral -algebra by [F3]. Keep the affine domain of each specified local section in a finite working family; on each such domain the section generates a finite-type submodule. Coefficients of monic certificates lie in the structure sheaf and belong to every -subalgebra. Only finitely many affine domains and choices occur.
Quasi-compact open pushforward. Let be a quasi-compact open immersion and a quasi-coherent module on . On any affine , the intersection is quasi-compact because is quasi-separated. Choose finitely many principal opens of covering . The sheaf equalizer computes from the finite product of and the finite product of . For , localization at is exact and commutes with these finite products; using quasi-coherence on each principal open, the localized equalizer is the equalizer for the cover of . Thus . This is exactly the affine-local criterion that is quasi-coherent.
Extension of a quasi-coherent subsheaf. Suppose with quasi-compact open and quasi-coherent on . The maps , , are maps of quasi-coherent modules by step 1.2. Their kernel is quasi-coherent by [F7]. Its projection to is injective, since is injective, and on its image is precisely . Hence extends to a quasi-coherent subsheaf .
Finite-type extension. Assume in step 2.1 is of finite type. Add one affine to at a time from a finite affine cover of . Apply step 2.1 over to obtain an extension . Write . The quasi-compact intersection has a finite principal cover . Since is finite type there, each has finitely many generators; choose numerator representatives in for all of them and let be the finite submodule they generate. Then for each , so and agree on and glue to a finite-type quasi-coherent subsheaf of on . Finite induction over the affine cover extends to all of .
Finite-type submodules and subalgebras. Any local section of a quasi-coherent module over an affine open lies in the finite-type submodule generated by it on ; step 3.1 extends that submodule to a finite-type quasi-coherent subsheaf of on . Finite sums give one such subsheaf containing any finite family of local sections. For the quasi-coherent algebra , take the subalgebra generated by such a finite-type submodule and : on every affine chart it has finitely many algebra generators, and localization commutes with forming the algebra generated by a module, so these chart subalgebras glue as a finite-type quasi-coherent subalgebra. Finite joins of these subalgebras are again finite type, so they form a filtered system whose union is .
Every member of the filtered system in step 4.1 is finite over . Indeed, on an affine open it has finitely many algebra generators, each integral over because is integral. By [F6] the resulting -algebra is finite as an -module. Thus the system is a filtered union of finite quasi-coherent subalgebras. For the finite set of sections and coefficients in the Statement, step 4.1 supplies a common finite-type subalgebra, and the preceding argument makes it finite.
The construction works on a finite affine cover from step 1.1 and contains each specified local section and certificate by step 5.1. The empty family uses the subalgebra generated by , which is finite; the zero-ring chart gives a zero algebra and causes no exception. AC enters only in selecting the finite affine covers, generators and representatives in steps 1.1–3.1 and in [F6]. No Noetherian or separated hypothesis beyond qcqs is used.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Properties of Schemes, Lemma 28.23.13 (tag 0817) and Section 28.23 (standard reference, not scraped)