How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A subalgebra generated by finitely many integral elements is module-finite
Statement
Let be commutative rings, a subring of (Subring: a subset containing and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication), let and let be integral over (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers). Then the -subalgebra of is module-finite over (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).
The zero ring is not excluded: if then and the conclusion holds with the empty generating list.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Commutative rings with a subring of , a natural number , and elements integral over .
A subring of contains and has the same zero and identity as (Subring: a subset containing and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication).
is the image of the unital ring homomorphism agreeing with the structure map on constants and sending to ; it is the smallest subring of containing the image of and . An algebra is module-finite over when it is finitely generated as an -module (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).
For a homomorphism of commutative rings , an element is integral over when it is a root of a monic polynomial in (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers).
Let be commutative rings with and let . Then is integral over if and only if is finitely generated as an -module (Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element).
If is generated as an -module by finitely many elements and a -module is generated as a -module by finitely many elements, then the products of the two lists generate as an -module; module finiteness is transitive along a tower of commutative algebras (Module finiteness is transitive along a tower of algebras).
Proof
Dispose of the zero base ring first. If then , and a subring shares the identity and zero of the ambient ring, so and ; every subalgebra of is then the zero module over , generated by the empty list. For the rest of the argument assume , so that and every subring of containing is a nonzero commutative ring.
The case : the subalgebra generated by the empty list is the smallest subring of containing , which is itself, and is generated as an -module by .
Let and suppose is module-finite over .
Write . Both and are the smallest subring of containing and , so they are equal. The element is a root of some monic ; the coefficients of lie in , so is a monic polynomial in with the same coefficients, and evaluating it at gives the same element of , namely . Hence is integral over . Since is a nonzero commutative subring of by step 1.1, the integrality criterion gives that is a finitely generated -module; with the assumption of step 1.3 that is a finitely generated -module, transitivity makes a finitely generated -module.
The base case of step 1.2 and the passage of step 2.1 give, by induction on , that is module-finite over for every .
Remarks
-
The nonzero hypothesis of the cited integrality theorem is why the zero ring is disposed of first. Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element assumes ; step 1.1 removes that case by hand rather than leaving the citation standing over a ring the source excludes.
-
Integrality over the enlarged ring is inherited, not re-proved. The same monic polynomial serves at every stage, which is what keeps the induction from needing a new integrality hypothesis at each step.
-
Finitely many elements is essential. The subalgebra generated by an infinite set of integral elements is integral over but need not be module-finite; each finite subfamily is, and the union of an increasing chain of finite modules need not be finite.
Depends on
- Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers
- Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element
- Module finiteness is transitive along a tower of algebras
- Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras
- Subring: a subset containing $1_R$ and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Hochster, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Math 614, Ch. 5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., §10 and (16.21) (standard reference, not scraped)