How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The quasi-finite locus of a finite-type algebra is open
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a ring map of finite type (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras). Then the set of primes
is open in (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra, Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum, The vanishing sets define the Zariski topology on the prime spectrum).
At every point of the local theorem Algebraic Zariski Main localization at a quasi-finite prime supplies an element of the relative integral closure at which the algebra becomes a principal localisation of that closure. Because the algebra is of finite type, the closure may be replaced there by the finite subalgebra it generates, and such a finite algebra is quasi-finite over the base at every one of its primes; this is the content of the proof below, which is where the Axiom of Choice enters, through the local theorem.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital ring map of finite type, the relative integral closure of the image of in , and the Axiom of Choice, assumed throughout.
The map is quasi-finite at when the -algebra is finite over , that is, finitely generated as a -module, equivalently finite-dimensional over (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra).
An -algebra is of finite type over when for finitely many elements, equivalently a quotient of a polynomial ring, and it is module-finite over when it is finitely generated as an -module (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a finite type map that is quasi-finite at there is , where is the integral closure of the image of in , such that the inclusion induces an isomorphism of localisations (Algebraic Zariski Main localization at a quasi-finite prime).
For a unital ring map the relative integral closure is the set of elements of integral over the map; it is a subring of containing the image of , hence an -subalgebra, and it is exactly the integral closure of the image of in (Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map).
If is a subring and are integral over , then the -subalgebra is module-finite over (A subalgebra generated by finitely many integral elements is module-finite).
For multiplicative subsets with image in and the multiplicative subset generated by there is a unique -algebra isomorphism ; in particular (Localising twice is localising once at the multiplicative set generated by both denominator sets).
For an ideal of a commutative ring and a multiplicative subset with image in there is a canonical isomorphism (Localisation commutes with quotient rings: ).
The localisation consists of the classes with , , and every maps to a unit, with (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation as equivalence classes of fractions).
For a prime ideal of a commutative ring there is a canonical field isomorphism , the residue field ( is the residue field at ).
The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the statement that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
For a multiplicative subset contraction along the localisation map induces an inclusion-preserving bijection , with inverse (Prime ideals of a localization are exactly the primes disjoint from the denominator set).
For in a commutative ring the principal localisation is with , and its elements may be written ; in particular is canonically isomorphic to (Principal localisation ).
For the principal distinguished subset is , the complement of inside (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum).
The subsets , as ranges over the ideals of , contain and , are closed under arbitrary intersections and finite unions, and define a topology on (The vanishing sets define the Zariski topology on the prime spectrum).
Proof
We assume the Axiom of Choice as recorded in [L10]. By [L2] the finite type -algebra has the form for some and elements , and is an -subalgebra of containing the image of by [L4]. We must show that the set of primes at which is quasi-finite, in the sense of [L1], is open in the topology of [L14].
We record a general fact about module-finite algebras. Let be module-finite over a ring and let ; choose generating as a -module. Then the images of generate as a -module, and therefore generate the -algebra as a module over by [L9]: localising a module at a multiplicative set multiplies its generating set by scalars and never enlarges it. Hence is a finite-dimensional -algebra.
We also record a general fact about localising finite-dimensional algebras. Let be a finite-dimensional algebra over a field and let be a multiplicative subset. For every the ideals of are -subspaces of the finite-dimensional -vector space , so the chain stabilises: there is with , hence for some and therefore in . Since is a unit of with inverse by [L8], the image of is invertible in , so the image of is zero there, that is in . Consequently every element of is of the form with and hence lies in the image of the localisation map , which is therefore surjective as a -linear map; so and is finite-dimensional over .
Let and put . By [L3] there is such that the inclusion induces an isomorphism of localisations; we fix such a and view as subrings of the common ring .
The localisation is a finitely generated -algebra: its elements are the fractions with numerator in and denominator a power of by [L12], so the images of together with generate over by [L2]. Hence there are finitely many elements generating as an -algebra; taking them to be the explicit generators just listed.
Each lies in , so by [L12] and [L8] it can be written with and some exponent . Put . Then : the inclusion gives , while each generator of over lies in , so . Also is an -subalgebra of containing the image of .
Every generator of lies in and is therefore integral over by [L4]. Writing for the image of in , the elements are integral over the subring , so [L5] shows that is module-finite over ; the same finite list generates as an -module, so is module-finite over , and is of finite type over by [L2].
Now let with , and put , and -prime , . The primes and correspond under the -algebra isomorphism of step 3.1, because contraction along and recovers and by [L11] and .
Consequently, for the module-finite -algebra of step 4.1 and any prime with contraction , the algebra is finite-dimensional over . Indeed, , so [L7] gives for the prime ; put , which is finite-dimensional over by step 1.2, and let be the image of in and the image of . Since , we have ; applying [L6] to the multiplicative subsets and of the ring shows that , a localisation of the finite-dimensional -algebra at a multiplicative subset, which is finite-dimensional over by step 1.3.
Hence the canonical -algebra homomorphism is an isomorphism: both rings are localisations of the common ring at the primes and of step 4.2, and [L6] exhibits each of them as a localisation at the multiplicative subset of the common ring generated by together with the elements outside that prime.
Therefore is finite-dimensional over by step 5.1, and since is of finite type over by step 1.1 and , the map is quasi-finite at by [L1]. Thus .
It remains to draw the topological conclusion. By [L13] and [L14] each set is the complement of a closed subset, hence open in the topology of [L14]. Step 2.1 attaches to every an element with , and step 6.1 shows ; thus every point of has an open neighbourhood contained in , which is the defining property of an open subset, so is open (no selection from infinitely many points is needed, the argument being applied to one prime at a time).
The proof used the Axiom of Choice only in step 2.1, through [L3]; every other step selected finitely many elements (the generators , the generators , the numerators , the module generators , the exponent and the elements of step 1.3). ∎
Depends on
- Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra
- Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras
- Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map
- Algebraic Zariski Main localization at a quasi-finite prime
- A subalgebra generated by finitely many integral elements is module-finite
- Localising twice is localising once at the multiplicative set generated by both denominator sets
- Localisation commutes with quotient rings: $S^{-1}R/S^{-1}I\cong \bar S^{-1}(R/I)$
- Multiplicative subsets and the localisation $S^{-1}R$ as equivalence classes of fractions
- $R_{\mathfrak p}/\mathfrak pR_{\mathfrak p}\cong\operatorname{Frac}(R/\mathfrak p)$ is the residue field at $\mathfrak p$
- Principal localisation $R_f=\{1,f,f^2,\ldots\}^{-1}R$
- Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum
- The vanishing sets define the Zariski topology on the prime spectrum
- Prime ideals of a localization are exactly the primes disjoint from the denominator set
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Commutative Algebra, Section 10.123, Lemma 10.123.13 with its proof (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, version 4.03, Corollary 17.11 (standard reference, not scraped)