Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The quasi-finite locus of a finite-type algebra is open

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let R→S be a ring map of finite type (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras). Then the set of primes

U={q∈Spec⁡(S):R→S is quasi-finite at q}

is open in Spec⁡(S) (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra, Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum, The vanishing sets define the Zariski topology on the prime spectrum).

At every point of U the local theorem Algebraic Zariski Main localization at a quasi-finite prime supplies an element of the relative integral closure at which the algebra becomes a principal localisation of that closure. Because the algebra is of finite type, the closure may be replaced there by the finite subalgebra it generates, and such a finite algebra is quasi-finite over the base at every one of its primes; this is the content of the proof below, which is where the Axiom of Choice enters, through the local theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A unital ring map R→S of finite type, the relative integral closure S′=Int⁡R(S)⊆S of the image of R in S, and the Axiom of Choice, assumed throughout.

[L1]

The map R→S is quasi-finite at q when the κ(p)-algebra Sq/pSq is finite over κ(p), that is, finitely generated as a κ(p)-module, equivalently finite-dimensional over κ(p) (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra).

[L2]

An R-algebra A is of finite type over R when A=R[a1,…,an] for finitely many elements, equivalently a quotient of a polynomial ring, and it is module-finite over R when it is finitely generated as an R-module (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).

[L3]

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a finite type map R→S that is quasi-finite at q∈Spec⁡(S) there is g∈S′∖q, where S′ is the integral closure of the image of R in S, such that the inclusion induces an isomorphism Sg′≅Sg of localisations (Algebraic Zariski Main localization at a quasi-finite prime).

[L4]

For a unital ring map R→S the relative integral closure Int⁡R(S) is the set of elements of S integral over the map; it is a subring of S containing the image of R, hence an R-subalgebra, and it is exactly the integral closure of the image of R in S (Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map).

[L5]

If A⊆B is a subring and b1,…,bn∈B are integral over A, then the A-subalgebra A[b1,…,bn] is module-finite over A (A subalgebra generated by finitely many integral elements is module-finite).

[L6]

For multiplicative subsets S,T⊆R with image Tˉ in S−1R and U the multiplicative subset generated by S∪T there is a unique R-algebra isomorphism Tˉ−1(S−1R)≅U−1R; in particular (Rf)g≅Rfg (Localising twice is localising once at the multiplicative set generated by both denominator sets).

[L7]

For an ideal I of a commutative ring R and a multiplicative subset S⊆R with image Sˉ in R/I there is a canonical isomorphism (S−1R)/(S−1I)≅Sˉ−1(R/I) (Localisation commutes with quotient rings: S−1R/S−1I≅Sˉ−1(R/I)).

[L8]

The localisation S−1R consists of the classes r/s with r∈R, s∈S, and every s∈S maps to a unit, with (s/1)−1=1/s (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S−1R as equivalence classes of fractions).

[L9]

For a prime ideal p of a commutative ring R there is a canonical field isomorphism Rp/pRp≅Frac⁡(R/p), the residue field κ(p) (Rp/pRp≅Frac⁡(R/p) is the residue field at p).

[L10]

The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the statement that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[L11]

For a multiplicative subset S⊆R contraction along the localisation map induces an inclusion-preserving bijection Spec⁡(S−1R)→{p∈Spec⁡(R):p∩S=∅}, with inverse p↦S−1p (Prime ideals of a localization are exactly the primes disjoint from the denominator set).

[L12]

For f in a commutative ring R the principal localisation is Rf=Sf−1R with Sf={1,f,f2,…}, and its elements may be written r/fn; in particular R1 is canonically isomorphic to R (Principal localisation Rf={1,f,f2,…}−1R).

[L13]

For f∈R the principal distinguished subset is D(f)={p∈Spec⁡(R):f∉p}, the complement of V((f)) inside Spec⁡(R) (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum).

[L14]

The subsets V(I), as I ranges over the ideals of R, contain Spec⁡(R) and ∅, are closed under arbitrary intersections and finite unions, and define a topology on Spec⁡(R) (The vanishing sets define the Zariski topology on the prime spectrum).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

We assume the Axiom of Choice as recorded in [L10]. By [L2] the finite type R-algebra S has the form S=R[s1,…,sn] for some n≥0 and elements si∈S, and S′=Int⁡R(S) is an R-subalgebra of S containing the image of R by [L4]. We must show that the set U of primes q at which R→S is quasi-finite, in the sense of [L1], is open in the topology of [L14].

givenL1L2L4L10L14
1.2

We record a general fact about module-finite algebras. Let B be module-finite over a ring C and let p∈Spec⁡(C); choose b1,…,bm∈B generating B as a C-module. Then the images of b1,…,bm generate B/pB as a C/p-module, and therefore generate the C/p-algebra (B/pB)⊗C/pκ(p) as a module over κ(p)=Frac⁡(C/p) by [L9]: localising a module at a multiplicative set multiplies its generating set by scalars and never enlarges it. Hence (B/pB)⊗C/pκ(p) is a finite-dimensional κ(p)-algebra.

givenL2L9
1.3

We also record a general fact about localising finite-dimensional algebras. Let C be a finite-dimensional algebra over a field K and let W⊆C be a multiplicative subset. For every u∈W the ideals (u)⊇(u2)⊇(u3)⊇⋯ of C are K-subspaces of the finite-dimensional K-vector space C, so the chain stabilises: there is N≥1 with (uN)=(uN+1), hence uN=uN+1x for some x∈C and therefore uN(1−ux)=0 in C. Since u is a unit of W−1C with inverse 1/u by [L8], the image of uN is invertible in W−1C, so the image of 1−ux is zero there, that is x=1/u in W−1C. Consequently every element of W−1C is of the form c⋅x with c∈C and hence lies in the image of the localisation map C→W−1C, which is therefore surjective as a K-linear map; so dim⁡KW−1C≤dim⁡KC and W−1C is finite-dimensional over K.

givenL8
2.1

Let q∈U and put p=q∩R. By [L3] there is g∈S′∖q such that the inclusion S′→S induces an isomorphism Sg′→Sg of localisations; we fix such a g and view Sg′=Sg as subrings of the common ring Sg.

givenstep 1.1L3
2.2

The localisation Sg is a finitely generated R-algebra: its elements are the fractions with numerator in S and denominator a power of g by [L12], so the images of s1,…,sn together with 1/g generate Sg over R by [L2]. Hence there are finitely many elements z1,…,zN∈Sg generating Sg as an R-algebra; taking them to be the explicit generators just listed.

givenstep 1.1L2L12
3.1

Each zj lies in Sg′=Sg, so by [L12] and [L8] it can be written zj=yj/gmj with yj∈S′ and some exponent mj≥0. Put T:=R[g,y1,…,yN]⊆S′. Then Tg=Sg: the inclusion T⊆S′ gives Tg⊆Sg′=Sg, while each generator zj=yj/gmj of Sg over R lies in Tg, so Sg⊆Tg. Also T is an R-subalgebra of S containing the image of R.

givenstep 2.1step 2.2L2L8L12
4.1

Every generator g,y1,…,yN of T lies in S′ and is therefore integral over R by [L4]. Writing A for the image of R in S, the elements g,y1,…,yN are integral over the subring A⊆S, so [L5] shows that T=A[g,y1,…,yN] is module-finite over A; the same finite list generates T as an R-module, so T is module-finite over R, and T is of finite type over R by [L2].

givenstep 3.1L2L4L5
4.2

Now let q′∈Spec⁡(S) with g∉q′, and put q′′:=q′∩T, p′:=q′∩R=q′′∩R and Tg-prime q′′Tg⊆Tg, q′Sg⊆Sg. The primes q′′Tg and q′Sg correspond under the R-algebra isomorphism Tg≅Sg of step 3.1, because contraction along T→Tg and S→Sg recovers q′′ and q′ by [L11] and q′∩T=q′′.

givenstep 3.1L11
5.1

Consequently, for the module-finite R-algebra T of step 4.1 and any prime r∈Spec⁡(T) with contraction p=r∩R, the algebra Tr/pTr is finite-dimensional over κ(p). Indeed, pT⊆r, so [L7] gives Tr/pTr≅(T/pT)rˉ for the prime rˉ=r/pT; put C:=(T/pT)⊗R/pκ(p), which is finite-dimensional over κ(p) by step 1.2, and let S0 be the image of (R/p)∖{0} in T/pT and Uˉ the image of (T/pT)∖rˉ. Since rˉ∩(R/p)=0, we have S0⊆(T/pT)∖rˉ; applying [L6] to the multiplicative subsets S0 and (T/pT)∖rˉ of the ring T/pT shows that (T/pT)rˉ≅Uˉ−1C, a localisation of the finite-dimensional κ(p)-algebra C at a multiplicative subset, which is finite-dimensional over κ(p) by step 1.3.

givenstep 4.1step 1.2step 1.3L6L7L9
5.2

Hence the canonical R-algebra homomorphism Tq′′→Sq′ is an isomorphism: both rings are localisations of the common ring Tg=Sg at the primes q′′Tg and q′Sg of step 4.2, and [L6] exhibits each of them as a localisation at the multiplicative subset of the common ring generated by {gn} together with the elements outside that prime.

givenstep 4.2L6L12
6.1

Therefore Tq′′/p′Tq′′≅Sq′/p′Sq′ is finite-dimensional over κ(p′) by step 5.1, and since S is of finite type over R by step 1.1 and p′=q′∩R, the map R→S is quasi-finite at q′ by [L1]. Thus DS(g)⊆U.

givenstep 5.1step 5.2L1
7.1

It remains to draw the topological conclusion. By [L13] and [L14] each set DS(g)=Spec⁡(S)∖V((g)) is the complement of a closed subset, hence open in the topology of [L14]. Step 2.1 attaches to every q∈U an element g∈S with q∈DS(g), and step 6.1 shows DS(g)⊆U; thus every point of U has an open neighbourhood contained in U, which is the defining property of an open subset, so U is open (no selection from infinitely many points is needed, the argument being applied to one prime at a time).

givenstep 2.1step 6.1L13L14
8.1

The proof used the Axiom of Choice only in step 2.1, through [L3]; every other step selected finitely many elements (the generators si, the generators zj, the numerators yj, the module generators bi, the exponent N and the elements u,x of step 1.3). ∎

givenstep 1.1step 2.1L10

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources