Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map

Definition

Let R→S be a unital ring map of commutative rings, with φ its underlying map, and let φ(R)⊆S be its image. An element s∈S is integral over the ring map R→S when s is a root of a monic polynomial with coefficients in the image of R (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers): that is, when

sd+φ(ad−1)sd−1+⋯+φ(a1)s+φ(a0)=0

for some d≥1 and some a0,…,ad−1∈R. This is integrality of the element s over φ(R). The ring map R→S is integral in the sense of Integral ring maps and integral extensions precisely when every element s∈S satisfies such an equation.

Write

Int⁡R(S)={s∈S:s is integral over R→S}

for this set. Then Int⁡R(S) is a subring of S (Subring: a subset containing 1R and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication) containing φ(R), hence an R-subalgebra of S for the restricted structure map (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms); it is called the integral closure of the image of R in S, and in this page the notation S′⊆S always denotes this relative integral closure. The reason is Integral elements over a nonzero base ring form a subring: if φ(R)≠0 the published statement applies to the inclusion φ(R)⊆S, whose integral elements over φ(R) are exactly the elements listed above; if φ(R)=0 then 1S=φ(1R)=0, so S=0 and Int⁡R(S)={0}=S is again a subring.

Conventions kept here. (i) No hypothesis of injectivity is imposed: the map R→S may have a kernel, and Int⁡R(S) is a subring of S containing the image, not of R. (ii) No hypothesis excluding zero divisors or nilpotents is imposed, and all arguments below proceed in S itself; in particular Integrality and integral closure commute with localisation may be applied through the structure map without assuming that R→S is injective. (iii) When R⊆S are domains in the sense of Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains, this set is the integral closure of R in S, so the present definition specialises to the published one, which is not assumed here.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources