Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The punctured affine line as an open finite factorization

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field, put R=k[t] and let S=k[t,t−1]=Rt be the principal localisation of R at t (Principal localisation Rf={1,f,f2,…}−1R). Then:

  1. The inclusion R→S is of finite type and quasi-finite (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra). Its fibres are as follows: over the prime (t) of R the fibre is empty, and indeed S⊗Rκ((t))=0; over every prime p of R with t∉p the fibre ring is the residue field, S⊗Rκ(p)≅κ(p), and the local fibre at the uniquely determined prime above p is that same field κ(p).

  2. The finite R-algebra T:=R realizes the factorization of A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra with the single element g:=t: the element t lies in T and avoids every prime of S, Tt=Rt=S=St, and the contraction map Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(T)=Spec⁡(R) is a homeomorphism onto DR(t) (The spectrum of a principal localisation is the distinguished open D(f)). No cover by more than one principal open is needed.

So the inclusion of the punctured affine line over the affine line is the simplest instance of Zariski's main theorem in its open form: the quasi-finite algebra is already a principal localisation of the finite R-algebra R itself, and the open image is the principal open D(t). The Axiom of Choice is recorded only because the general factorization theorem is invoked in part 2; the fibre computation and the display Tt=S are explicit and choice-free.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the polynomial ring R=k[t], the principal localisation S=Rt=k[t,t−1] of R at t, and the Axiom of Choice.

[L1]

The map R→S is quasi-finite at q when Sq/pSq is finite over κ(p), the map is quasi-finite when it is of finite type and quasi-finite at every prime, and the fibre of Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(R) over p is Spec⁡(S⊗Rκ(p)), the local ring at the prime over p being Sq/pSq (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra).

[L2]

An R-algebra A is of finite type over R when A=R[a1,…,an] for finitely many elements, and module-finite over R when it is finitely generated as an R-module (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).

[L3]

For f∈R the principal localisation is Rf=Sf−1R with Sf={1,f,f2,…}, and its elements may be written r/fn; in particular R1 is canonically isomorphic to R (Principal localisation Rf={1,f,f2,…}−1R).

[L4]

For f∈R the localisation map R→Rf induces a homeomorphism from Spec⁡(Rf) onto the distinguished open subset D(f) (The spectrum of a principal localisation is the distinguished open D(f)).

[L5]

For a unital ring map A→C and a multiplicative subset M⊆A there is a ring isomorphism (M−1A)⊗AC≅M‾−1C, with no flatness, finite-generation or nonzero-ring hypothesis (Presentations and localization under base extension).

[L6]

For multiplicative subsets S,T⊆R, with Tˉ the image of T in S−1R and U generated by S∪T, there is an isomorphism Tˉ−1(S−1R)≅U−1R (Localising twice is localising once at the multiplicative set generated by both denominator sets).

[L7]

For a prime ideal p of R there is a canonical field isomorphism Rp/pRp≅Frac⁡(R/p), the residue field κ(p) (Rp/pRp≅Frac⁡(R/p) is the residue field at p).

[L8]

Contraction along the localisation map R→S−1R is an inclusion-preserving bijection from Spec⁡(S−1R) onto the primes of R disjoint from S, with inverse p↦S−1p (Prime ideals of a localization are exactly the primes disjoint from the denominator set).

[L9]

Assume the Axiom of Choice. If R→S is of finite type and quasi-finite at every prime of S and S′ is the integral closure of the image of R in S, then there are a finite R-subalgebra T⊆S′ and finitely many g1,…,gn∈T with the contraction map Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(T) a homeomorphism onto the open set U=DT(g1)∪⋯∪DT(gn), Tgi≅Sgi, and Tg≅Sg for every g∈T with DT(g)⊆U (A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra).

[L10]

An element b of a commutative ring B is integral over a subring A⊆B when it is a root of a monic polynomial in A[X] (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers).

[L11]

For a unital ring map R→S the relative integral closure Int⁡R(S) is the subring of S consisting of the elements integral over the map; it contains the image of R and is the integral closure of that image in S (Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map).

[L12]

In the localisation S−1R two fractions are equal, r/s=r′/s′, if and only if v(rs′−r′s)=0 for some v∈S, and every s∈S maps to a unit (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S−1R as equivalence classes of fractions).

[L13]

If R is an integral domain then so is R[x]; in particular k[t] is a domain (A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain).

[L14]

The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the statement that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Take R=k[t] and S=Rt=k[t,t−1], the principal localisation of R at t as in [L3], and note S≠0 since R is a domain by [L13] and a localisation of a nonzero ring at a nonzerodivisor is nonzero: if r/tn=0 then tmr=0 for some m≥0 by [L12], whence r=0. The localisation map R→S is injective by the same computation, so we may view R⊆S. Every element of S is of the form r/tn, that is r⋅(1/t)n, so S=R[1/t] is generated as an R-algebra by the single element 1/t; hence R→S is of finite type by [L2].

givenL2L3L12L13
2.1

We compute the fibres. Let p∈Spec⁡(R) and apply [L5] with A=R, C=κ(p) and the multiplicative subset M={1,t,t2,…} of R, whose image in κ(p) is generated by the image of t: S⊗Rκ(p)=(M−1R)⊗Rκ(p)≅M‾−1κ(p)=κ(p)t. By [L7] the field κ(p) is Frac⁡(R/p), so the image of t in κ(p) is zero exactly when t∈p. If t∈p, then inverting the zero element of a ring gives the zero ring, so κ(p)t=0 and therefore S⊗Rκ(p)=0; if t∉p, then the image of t in the field κ(p) is a nonzero element, hence a unit, and then every fraction r/tn=r(t−1)n already lies in κ(p), so κ(p)t=κ(p).

givenstep 1.1L5L7
2.2

For part 2 put T:=R, viewed as a subring of S by step 1.1. Then T is module-finite over R because it is generated as an R-module by the single element 1, hence a finite R-algebra in the sense of [L2]. Every element r∈R is integral over R, being a root of the monic polynomial X−r∈R[X] by [L10]; so R⊆Int⁡R(S)=S′ by [L11], and T=R is a finite R-subalgebra of S′.

givenstep 1.1L2L10L11
3.1

By the fibre form of [L1] the fibre of Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(R) over p is Spec⁡(S⊗Rκ(p)). Hence by step 2.1 the fibre over the prime (t) is Spec⁡(0)=∅, in particular S⊗Rκ((t))=0 and no prime of S lies over (t), while over every p with t∉p the fibre is Spec⁡(κ(p)), a single point. This matches [L8], which shows that the primes of S=Rt are exactly the primes of R not containing t.

givenstep 2.1L1L8
3.2

With g:=t∈T we have Tt=Rt=S by [L3] and St=S, since t is already invertible in S=Rt; and g∉q for every q∈Spec⁡(S) by [L8]. The contraction map Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(T)=Spec⁡(R) is a homeomorphism onto DR(t) by [L4] applied to f=t, which is the open set U=DT(t); this is exactly the configuration of [L9] with n=1, g1=t and a single principal open.

givenstep 2.2L3L4L8L9
4.1

We compute the local fibres and quasi-finiteness. Let q∈Spec⁡(S) and let p=q∩R be its contraction; by [L8] we have t∉p. Localizing S=Rt at q is the same as localizing R at the image of R∖p, because t∈R∖p and therefore the multiplicative set generated by t and R∖p is just R∖p, by [L6]. Every s=r/tn∈S outside q has r∉p, so it becomes a unit after localizing by R∖p; conversely every element of R∖p maps outside q. Thus the two localizations have the same universal property and Sq=(Rt)q≅Rp, an isomorphism of R-algebras carrying the extension of p to the extension of p. It follows that Sq/pSq≅Rp/pRp≅κ(p) by [L7]. This is finite over the field κ(p), of dimension one; by [L1] the map R→S is quasi-finite at q, and since q was arbitrary and R→S is of finite type by step 1.1, the map is quasi-finite.

givenstep 1.1step 3.1L1L6L7L8
5.1

Part 1 is proved by steps 1.1, 2.1 and 4.1: the map is finite type and quasi-finite, the fibre over (t) is empty with S⊗Rκ((t))=0, over every other prime the fibre ring is κ(p), and the local fibre at the prime above p is that same field.

step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1
6.1

The Axiom of Choice was recorded in the Statement for the same reason it appears in [L9], namely the general factorization theorem invoked in step 3.2; the computations of steps 1.1, 2.1, 4.1, 2.2 and 3.2 manipulate finitely many explicit elements (t, 1/t, the fractions r/tn) and no family of nonempty sets is selected anywhere. This proves both parts. ∎

givenstep 3.2L9L14

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources