How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Algebraic Zariski Main for Quasi-Finite Morphisms: Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Affine Algebraic Sets and Coordinate Rings
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Algebraic Zariski Main for Quasi-Finite Morphisms
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Classical Affine Varieties: Coordinate Rings, Morphisms, and Rational Maps
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Dimension Constructible Images and Dimensions of Fibres
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Fibre Products Base Change and Scheme Theoretic Fibres
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Metric Spaces
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Presheaves Sheaves Stalks and Sheafification
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sheaf Operations Exactness Ringed Spaces and Module Pullback
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Splitting Fields
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Zariski Topology on Prime Spectra
2 · Summary
These three items show the range of the companion page's two main theorems on explicit coordinate rings, and where quasi-finiteness stops.
The first is the open immersion : its fibre over the prime is empty, in the sharp form , while over every prime avoiding the fibre ring is the residue field itself, and the single element of the finite algebra already produces the theorem's configuration with . The second takes a module-finite algebra: the relative integral closure of the image of is all of , the local form of Zariski's main theorem holds with the element at every prime, and the finite factorization is the identity with and the single principal open — the extremal case in which nothing has to be inverted.
The third item is a counterexample, and is the reason the theorems are stated with an open piece rather than with finiteness: for and with the diagonal structure, the map is finite type and quasi-finite, with fibres over and over every other prime, yet is not a finite -module — otherwise would be integral over , and multiplying its monic equation by a power of would give . Here the relative integral closure is the finite algebra , contained properly in , and the single element of it satisfies with open image in . All three computations are explicit and choice-free; the Axiom of Choice is recorded in each statement only because the general theorems they illustrate assume it.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The punctured affine line as an open finite factorization
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, put and let be the principal localisation of at (Principal localisation ). Then:
-
The inclusion is of finite type and quasi-finite (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra). Its fibres are as follows: over the prime of the fibre is empty, and indeed over every prime of with the fibre ring is the residue field, , and the local fibre at the uniquely determined prime above is that same field .
-
The finite -algebra realizes the factorization of A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra with the single element : the element lies in and avoids every prime of , and the contraction map is a homeomorphism onto (The spectrum of a principal localisation is the distinguished open D(f)). No cover by more than one principal open is needed.
So the inclusion of the punctured affine line over the affine line is the simplest instance of Zariski's main theorem in its open form: the quasi-finite algebra is already a principal localisation of the finite -algebra itself, and the open image is the principal open . The Axiom of Choice is recorded only because the general factorization theorem is invoked in part 2; the fibre computation and the display are explicit and choice-free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the polynomial ring , the principal localisation of at , and the Axiom of Choice.
The map is quasi-finite at when is finite over , the map is quasi-finite when it is of finite type and quasi-finite at every prime, and the fibre of over is , the local ring at the prime over being (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra).
An -algebra is of finite type over when for finitely many elements, and module-finite over when it is finitely generated as an -module (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).
For the principal localisation is with , and its elements may be written ; in particular is canonically isomorphic to (Principal localisation ).
For the localisation map induces a homeomorphism from onto the distinguished open subset (The spectrum of a principal localisation is the distinguished open D(f)).
For a unital ring map and a multiplicative subset there is a ring isomorphism , with no flatness, finite-generation or nonzero-ring hypothesis (Presentations and localization under base extension).
For multiplicative subsets , with the image of in and generated by , there is an isomorphism (Localising twice is localising once at the multiplicative set generated by both denominator sets).
For a prime ideal of there is a canonical field isomorphism , the residue field ( is the residue field at ).
Contraction along the localisation map is an inclusion-preserving bijection from onto the primes of disjoint from , with inverse (Prime ideals of a localization are exactly the primes disjoint from the denominator set).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. If is of finite type and quasi-finite at every prime of and is the integral closure of the image of in , then there are a finite -subalgebra and finitely many with the contraction map a homeomorphism onto the open set , , and for every with (A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra).
An element of a commutative ring is integral over a subring when it is a root of a monic polynomial in (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers).
For a unital ring map the relative integral closure is the subring of consisting of the elements integral over the map; it contains the image of and is the integral closure of that image in (Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map).
In the localisation two fractions are equal, , if and only if for some , and every maps to a unit (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation as equivalence classes of fractions).
If is an integral domain then so is ; in particular is a domain (A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain).
The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the statement that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Take and , the principal localisation of at as in [L3], and note since is a domain by [L13] and a localisation of a nonzero ring at a nonzerodivisor is nonzero: if then for some by [L12], whence . The localisation map is injective by the same computation, so we may view . Every element of is of the form , that is , so is generated as an -algebra by the single element ; hence is of finite type by [L2].
We compute the fibres. Let and apply [L5] with , and the multiplicative subset of , whose image in is generated by the image of : By [L7] the field is , so the image of in is zero exactly when . If , then inverting the zero element of a ring gives the zero ring, so and therefore ; if , then the image of in the field is a nonzero element, hence a unit, and then every fraction already lies in , so .
For part 2 put , viewed as a subring of by step 1.1. Then is module-finite over because it is generated as an -module by the single element , hence a finite -algebra in the sense of [L2]. Every element is integral over , being a root of the monic polynomial by [L10]; so by [L11], and is a finite -subalgebra of .
By the fibre form of [L1] the fibre of over is . Hence by step 2.1 the fibre over the prime is , in particular and no prime of lies over , while over every with the fibre is , a single point. This matches [L8], which shows that the primes of are exactly the primes of not containing .
With we have by [L3] and , since is already invertible in ; and for every by [L8]. The contraction map is a homeomorphism onto by [L4] applied to , which is the open set ; this is exactly the configuration of [L9] with , and a single principal open.
We compute the local fibres and quasi-finiteness. Let and let be its contraction; by [L8] we have . Localizing at is the same as localizing at the image of , because and therefore the multiplicative set generated by and is just , by [L6]. Every outside has , so it becomes a unit after localizing by ; conversely every element of maps outside . Thus the two localizations have the same universal property and an isomorphism of -algebras carrying the extension of to the extension of . It follows that by [L7]. This is finite over the field , of dimension one; by [L1] the map is quasi-finite at , and since was arbitrary and is of finite type by step 1.1, the map is quasi-finite.
Part 1 is proved by steps 1.1, 2.1 and 4.1: the map is finite type and quasi-finite, the fibre over is empty with , over every other prime the fibre ring is , and the local fibre at the prime above is that same field.
The Axiom of Choice was recorded in the Statement for the same reason it appears in [L9], namely the general factorization theorem invoked in step 3.2; the computations of steps 1.1, 2.1, 4.1, 2.2 and 3.2 manipulate finitely many explicit elements (, , the fractions ) and no family of nonempty sets is selected anywhere. This proves both parts. ∎
A finite algebra is its own Zariski Main factor
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a ring map such that is a finite -algebra, that is module-finite over (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras). Then:
-
The integral closure of the image of in (Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map) is all of .
-
In the local form of Zariski's main theorem (Algebraic Zariski Main localization at a quasi-finite prime) the element witnesses the conclusion at every prime: for every and
-
In the finite factorization theorem (A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra) one may take : this is a finite -subalgebra of that equals , the contraction map is the identity of , its image is open, and the cover of the theorem may be the single principal open (Distinguished-subset identities).
Thus for a module-finite algebra the local element, the finite factor and the open piece are the trivial ones: the relative integral closure is the whole algebra, nothing needs to be inverted, and the factorization is the identity. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the two general theorems cited in parts 2 and 3; the direct verification below uses the finite-module criterion for integrality and requires no choice.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A ring map such that is module-finite over , i.e. a finite -algebra, with the image of the structure map, and the Axiom of Choice.
An -algebra is module-finite over when it is finitely generated as an -module (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).
An element of a commutative ring is integral over a subring when it is a root of a monic polynomial in (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers).
The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the statement that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
Let be commutative rings with and . Then is integral over if and only if there exists a faithful -module that is finitely generated over , faithfulness meaning that implies for (Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element).
For a unital ring map the relative integral closure is the subring of of elements integral over the map; it contains the image of and is exactly the integral closure of that image in (Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map).
A proper ideal is prime when implies or (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).
For the principal localisation is with ; in particular is canonically isomorphic to (Principal localisation ).
For every ring homomorphism contraction defines a continuous map , and is a contravariant functor, so the identity ring map induces the identity on spectra (The prime-spectrum construction is a contravariant functor to topological spaces).
The subsets of contain and and define a topology on (The vanishing sets define the Zariski topology on the prime spectrum).
For one has and , and (Distinguished-subset identities).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a finite type map quasi-finite at there is with inducing an isomorphism (Algebraic Zariski Main localization at a quasi-finite prime).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a finite type map quasi-finite at every prime, with the integral closure of the image of in , there are a finite -subalgebra and finitely many with the contraction map a homeomorphism onto the open set , , and whenever (A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra).
Proof
We assume the Axiom of Choice as recorded in [L3]. By hypothesis is finitely generated as an -module by [L1], and is the image of the structure map. If then , so and every element of is trivially integral over ; assume from now on that .
Fix . Then is an -module through the subalgebra , and it is finitely generated over because it is finitely generated over and is a quotient of : the same finite generating set works. Moreover is a faithful -module, because for forces . By [L4] applied to and the element , the element is integral over in the sense of [L2]. As was arbitrary, every element of is integral over the map , and since consists exactly of those elements by [L5], we get . This is part 1.
For part 2 let . Since is a proper ideal by [L6] we have ; and by step 2.1, so by [L7]. Hence the triple satisfies the conclusion of [L11] at every prime : the localisation at the element is an isomorphism.
For part 3 put . Then is module-finite over by [L1], that is a finite -algebra, and is a finite -subalgebra of by step 2.1. The contraction map induced by the identity ring map is the identity of by [L8], its image is open in itself by [L9], and the single principal open equals by [L10]. Finally by [L7], so the data , , , satisfy all the assertions (1) and (2) of [L12].
The Axiom of Choice was used only through the two general theorems cited in steps 3.1 and 3.2, namely [L11] and [L12]; the direct verification of parts 1 to 3 above (the finite-module criterion of [L4], the element , the algebra , and the identities , ) manipulates finitely many explicit objects and selects nothing. This proves all three parts. ∎
Quasi-finite does not imply finite
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let and let be the principal localisation of at (Principal localisation ). Let be the product ring (The product ring with componentwise operations, its identity and its units ) with the diagonal -algebra structure , and put Then:
-
Finite type. , and ; hence is a ring map of finite type (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).
-
Fibres. For the fibre (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra) is over the prime , and over every prime with . In particular every fibre of is finite, of one or two points.
-
Quasi-finite. is quasi-finite at every prime of : for with contraction one has .
-
Not finite. is not module-finite over , that is, not a finite -algebra (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras). So a quasi-finite finite-type algebra need not be finite.
-
The finite factor. The relative integral closure (Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map) is , which is module-finite over , and with one has : a single element inverts the whole difference, and the contraction map is a homeomorphism onto the open set , whose two pieces are the whole first component of and inside the second one. This is the configuration of A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra and Quasi-finite algebras are source locally localizations of finite algebras with one element working at every prime of at once.
The Axiom of Choice is recorded because the two general factorization theorems cited in part 5 assume it; every computation of this item is performed on finitely many named elements and needs no choice.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the polynomial ring , the principal localisation of at , the product ring with the diagonal -algebra structure , the elements , and of , and the Axiom of Choice.
For a commutative ring the polynomial ring is the set of finitely supported coefficient functions with convolution product, the indeterminate being the coefficient function supported at with value (The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution).
If is an integral domain then is an integral domain; in particular is a domain with (A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain).
A field is a commutative unital ring with in which every nonzero element has a multiplicative inverse (Field).
The product ring carries componentwise operations and identity , and is a unit of if and only if and are units, with (The product ring with componentwise operations, its identity and its units ).
For the principal localisation is with , its elements may be written , is canonically isomorphic to , and is the zero ring (Principal localisation ).
In a localisation the classes are fractions , two fractions are equal exactly when for some , every maps to a unit with , and if the localisation is the zero ring (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation as equivalence classes of fractions).
Let be a commutative -algebra. For its image under the evaluation homomorphism is written and is the smallest subring of containing the image of and the ; is of finite type over when for finitely many elements, and module-finite over when is finitely generated as an -module (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).
For the degree is the largest with and ; the zero polynomial has no degree (Degree, leading coefficient and monic polynomial, with the zero polynomial having no degree).
For nonzero the coefficient of in is , and if then (Degree inequalities for sums and products over a commutative ring).
An element of a commutative ring is integral over a subring when it is a root of a monic polynomial in (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers).
For a unital ring map with image , the relative integral closure is the set of satisfying a monic equation , and it is a subring of containing (Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map).
A domain is integrally closed when every element of that is integral over already lies in (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).
For an integral domain the field of fractions is , with elements fractions for , (The field of fractions of an integral domain).
If is an integrally closed domain then the polynomial ring is integrally closed (Polynomial rings over normal domains are normal).
Let be commutative rings with and let . Then is integral over if and only if is finitely generated as an -module (Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element).
For a prime of there is a canonical field isomorphism ; this is the residue field ( is the residue field at ).
For commutative rings , a unital ring map and there is a unique unital ring homomorphism extending on constants and sending to , given by (Universal property of : a coefficient homomorphism and the image of determine a unique ring homomorphism).
If is monic and , there are unique with and or (Division by a monic polynomial over a commutative ring).
A ring homomorphism with kernel induces an isomorphism from onto its image (First isomorphism theorem for rings: ).
For a family of -modules and an -module there is a natural isomorphism ; in particular tensoring distributes over finite direct sums (Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums).
For every -module the multiplication map , , is an isomorphism (The regular module is a tensor unit: and ).
For a unital ring map and a multiplicative subset there is a ring isomorphism , where is the image of in (Presentations and localization under base extension).
For a finite-type map and with , the map is quasi-finite at when is finite over , and quasi-finite when it is finite type and quasi-finite at every prime; the fibre over is , the prime determines a prime of the fibre, and the local ring of the fibre at that prime is , either description being usable as the definition (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra).
For the principal distinguished subset is (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum).
For a multiplicative subset contraction along the localisation map is a homeomorphism from onto (The spectrum of a localisation is the subspace of primes disjoint from the denominator set).
Let be a commutative ring, an ideal and the quotient map. Then contraction along is a homeomorphism from onto the closed subset (The spectrum of a quotient is a closed subspace).
Contraction along a ring map is a continuous map, and (The prime-spectrum construction is a contravariant functor to topological spaces).
The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. If is finite type and quasi-finite at every prime of , with the integral closure of the image of in , then there are a finite -subalgebra that is module-finite over and finitely many with open, the contraction map a homeomorphism onto , and an isomorphism for every ; moreover for every with the inclusion induces an isomorphism (A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. If is finite type and quasi-finite at every prime of , then for every there are a finite -subalgebra of the relative integral closure, module-finite over , and an element with such that (Quasi-finite algebras are source locally localizations of finite algebras).
A proper ideal is prime when implies or ; in particular every prime ideal is proper and a unit of lies in no prime ideal (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).
A two-sided ideal of a ring is an additive subgroup of with for every and ; in a commutative ring the left, right and two-sided ideals agree (Left, right and two-sided ideals).
Proof
Take the field , the polynomial ring with indeterminate [L1], and [L5]. The ring is a domain with [L2], and is a localisation of it. Let be the product ring [L4], a commutative unital ring, and let , be the diagonal map: it is a unital ring homomorphism because the operations of are componentwise [L4], and it is injective, since forces by componentwise equality [L4]. Thus is a commutative -algebra with .
We record the prime ideals of a product ring. Let and be commutative rings and put , in ; then and , and for the componentwise operations [L4] give and . Let be a prime ideal of . Since , [L31] gives or ; not both, because then would contradict the properness of a prime ideal [L31]. Suppose and put ; this is an ideal of : if then , and if and then , because is an additive subgroup of closed under multiplication by elements of [L4, L32]. For the identity shows , hence ; conversely, if then is a sum of two elements of . Hence , and is prime: it is proper, since would give ; and if for , then , so or [L31]. Symmetrically, if then with a prime ideal of . Conversely, if is a prime ideal then is a prime ideal of : it is proper because , and forces , hence or , that is or [L4, L31]; symmetrically is prime for a prime ideal . Hence the prime ideals of a product ring are exactly the ideals with prime in and the ideals with prime in .
Put , and . Multiplying, [L4]. We claim . First, every element of is of the form with : an element of is [L5], and writing in [L1] gives , where the second sum lies in and the first is [L1]. Second, for and one has : indeed and multiplication by is componentwise [L4], while is the structure map [step 1.1]. Hence every element of is a polynomial in with coefficients in the image of , so because is itself a polynomial in ; therefore is of finite type [L7]. This proves part 1.
The element has inverse because is the inverse of [L5] and units multiply componentwise [L4]: . In particular is a unit of , so .
We compute the residue fields of . By [L16] with we have , the residue field being defined by that isomorphism. The evaluation map , , is the ring homomorphism of [L17] for and ; it is surjective, since it is the identity on constants. Its kernel is exactly the principal ideal : for the division of [L18] by the monic polynomial gives unique with and or , that is a constant, and evaluating gives ; hence if and only if , that is . So [L19] gives , and then by [L13] and [L3]: the field of fractions of a field is the field itself, because all its nonzero elements are already units. Moreover the image of in is zero, since and is the canonical composite.
The underlying additive group of is the direct sum , the -module structure being componentwise [L4]. Let and put . Tensoring the decomposition with over and applying [L20] and [L21] gives , and applying [L22] to the multiplicative subset with and gives , the principal localisation of the field at the image of [L5]. Now take : the element maps to by step 2.3, and inverting the zero element of a ring gives the zero ring [L6], so and by step 2.3.
Suppose, for contradiction, that is module-finite over , that is, finitely generated as an -module [L7]. By step 2.1 we have , so is a finitely generated -module, and the image of in is nonzero by step 1.1; applying the equivalence of [L15] with and — the module structure being the one transported along [L7] — we conclude that is integral over . By [L10] and [L11] there are and with in .
We compute the relative integral closure [L11]. First let be integral over . The second projection , , is a unital ring homomorphism — the operations are componentwise [L4] — and it carries to , so applying it to a monic equation for over produces a monic equation for over [L10, L11]; that is, is integral over . Now : every element of is a fraction with and [L5, L13]. The field is an integrally closed domain, since by [L3, L13] and every element of lies in [L12]; hence is an integrally closed domain by [L14]. So the element , being integral over , lies in . The first coordinate lies in by the definition of [L4]. Conversely, let ; then , where lies in the image of and hence in [L11], while is integral over because [L4, L10], and is a product of two elements of the subring [L11]. Hence , and .
Now let with and again put [L16]. The image of in is nonzero, because is a domain [L2] and , so its image in the field is a nonzero element, hence a unit [L3]. Therefore every fraction of already lies in [L5], so the localisation map is surjective as well as injective, that is ; with step 3.1 this gives as rings, a product of two copies of the residue field. This proves part 2.
We verify quasi-finiteness at a prime in the case . Let with . By [L23] the quotient is the local ring of the fibre at the prime determined by , and by step 3.1 the fibre ring is the field . A prime ideal of is proper, and no unit of a ring lies in a prime ideal — if were a unit then — [L31, L32], while every nonzero element of the field is a unit [L3]; hence every prime ideal of is , and since the fibre has the prime , that prime is . The local ring of the fibre there is therefore the localisation at the prime , and every class of that localisation equals , because is a unit of [L3, L6]; so the localisation map is bijective and Hence — the equality of fields being step 2.3 — a one-dimensional vector space over , hence a finite -module [L23].
We compute that equation in the two coordinates of [L4]. Since and , the second coordinate of the equation is in . Multiplying this equation by gives in . All terms of this equation lie in the subring , and is injective: if in , then in the domain for some , so , by the fraction criterion [L6, L2]. Hence the equation holds in , and , that is .
Put . As an -module, is generated by and : every is with the componentwise action [L4]. Hence is a finite -algebra [L7], in particular a finite -subalgebra of in the sense of [L29].
We verify quasi-finiteness at a prime in the case , where . By step 4.1 the fibre ring is with a field [L3], and by step 1.2, applied to the product ring , its prime ideals are exactly and . Let ; the multiplicative set of the localisation at is the complement . In the element is a unit [L6] and [L4], so ; consequently the map , , is a well-defined unital ring homomorphism [L6], injective because means for some , whence as and is a field [L3, L6], and surjective because every class in the localisation equals or for , again by the fraction criterion [L6]. Hence the local ring of the fibre at the prime over is , and symmetrically the one at the prime over is ; both are one-dimensional over . By [L23] the map is quasi-finite at every .
We show . If for some , then since in the domain [L2], and with while by [L8]. By [L9] the coefficient of in is , so and ; but has degree , a contradiction. Hence , contradicting step 4.3, and is not module-finite over . This proves part 4.
Put . For a product ring the localisation at a product element is the product of the localisations: the map , , is well defined and a unital ring homomorphism by the fraction criterion [L6] and the componentwise operations [L4], it is injective because for some means and , and it is surjective because maps to for . Applying this with , , and [L5] gives ; applying it with , and [L5] gives , since by step 2.2. Both isomorphisms are the canonical maps induced by the inclusion , so and the inclusion induces an isomorphism of principal localisations [L5].
By step 2.1 the map is of finite type and by steps 4.2 and 5.1 it is quasi-finite at every prime of ; hence it is quasi-finite [L23], and for every with contraction the quotient is isomorphic to , as computed in steps 4.2 and 5.1. This proves part 3.
By step 1.2 the primes of are exactly the ideals with and the ideals with , and the primes of are the ideals and with . For a prime of we compute , and for we get by the componentwise description of ideals of a product [L4]. Hence the image of the contraction map is the union of the set of primes , which is the entire first component of , and of the set of primes with in the image of the contraction . That contraction is the localisation map of at , so by [L25] its image is [L24, L5]. Finally, a prime contains only if , which is impossible [L4], while contains exactly when [L4]; so the image is precisely the open set [L24].
We record the topological form of step 6.2. The first projection of is a surjective unital ring homomorphism with kernel , and the second projection is surjective with kernel [L4]; by step 1.2 the primes of are exactly the primes of the two complementary closed sets and , and the analogous statements hold for the projections of , whose kernels are and . By [L26] the four contraction maps along these projections are homeomorphisms onto , , and respectively, while by functoriality [L27] the contraction map along the inclusion satisfies and , where is the second projection and is the localisation map [L4, L5]. Consequently carries the piece homeomorphically onto the piece of , and carries the piece homeomorphically onto the image of , which by [L25] is carried into the piece of . The two target pieces are disjoint by step 1.2, so is a homeomorphism onto their union, which is the open set of step 6.2. Therefore the data , and satisfy the conclusion of part 1 of [L29]; and since is a unit of by step 2.2, it lies in no prime ideal of [L31], so the same single element witnesses the conclusion of [L30] at every prime of simultaneously.
The Axiom of Choice [L28] is assumed in the Statement because the two general theorems invoked in step 7.1, namely [L29] and [L30], are stated with it; the proof above selects nothing. Every object used is named explicitly — the field , the rings , , , , the elements , , , , the primes , , and the finitely many of step 3.2 arise from fixed data, and the only localisations and tensor products are computed on finitely many explicit elements. Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are proved by steps 2.1; 3.1 with 4.1; 6.1; 5.2; and 3.3 with 4.4, 5.3, 6.2 and 7.1 respectively. ∎
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Commutative Algebra, Section 10.123, Lemma 10.123.14 and its illustration by an open immersion
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, version 4.03, Corollary 17.12
- The Stacks Project, Commutative Algebra, Section 10.123, Theorem 10.123.12 and Lemma 10.123.14 in the case of a finite algebra
- The Stacks Project, Commutative Algebra, Section 10.123, Theorem 10.123.12 and Lemma 10.123.14
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, version 4.03, Aside 17.9 and Corollary 17.12