Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Algebraic Zariski Main for Quasi-Finite Morphisms: Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These three items show the range of the companion page's two main theorems on explicit coordinate rings, and where quasi-finiteness stops.

The first is the open immersion R=k[t]→k[t,t−1]=Rt: its fibre over the prime (t) is empty, in the sharp form S⊗Rκ((t))=0, while over every prime avoiding t the fibre ring is the residue field itself, and the single element g=t of the finite algebra T=R already produces the theorem's configuration with Tt=S=St. The second takes a module-finite algebra: the relative integral closure of the image of R is all of S, the local form of Zariski's main theorem holds with the element g=1 at every prime, and the finite factorization is the identity with T=S and the single principal open DT(1)=Spec⁡(T) — the extremal case in which nothing has to be inverted.

The third item is a counterexample, and is the reason the theorems are stated with an open piece rather than with finiteness: for R=k[t] and S=R×R[t−1] with the diagonal structure, the map is finite type and quasi-finite, with fibres k over (t) and κ(p)×κ(p) over every other prime, yet S is not a finite R-module — otherwise u=(0,t−1)∈S=R[u] would be integral over R, and multiplying its monic equation by a power of t would give 1∈(t). Here the relative integral closure is the finite algebra R×R, contained properly in S, and the single element g=(1,t) of it satisfies (R×R)g=Sg=S with open image D(g)=Spec⁡(R)⊔D(t) in Spec⁡(R×R). All three computations are explicit and choice-free; the Axiom of Choice is recorded in each statement only because the general theorems they illustrate assume it.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-27Open item page →

The punctured affine line as an open finite factorization

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field, put R=k[t] and let S=k[t,t−1]=Rt be the principal localisation of R at t (Principal localisation Rf={1,f,f2,…}−1R). Then:

  1. The inclusion R→S is of finite type and quasi-finite (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra). Its fibres are as follows: over the prime (t) of R the fibre is empty, and indeed S⊗Rκ((t))=0; over every prime p of R with t∉p the fibre ring is the residue field, S⊗Rκ(p)≅κ(p), and the local fibre at the uniquely determined prime above p is that same field κ(p).

  2. The finite R-algebra T:=R realizes the factorization of A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra with the single element g:=t: the element t lies in T and avoids every prime of S, Tt=Rt=S=St, and the contraction map Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(T)=Spec⁡(R) is a homeomorphism onto DR(t) (The spectrum of a principal localisation is the distinguished open D(f)). No cover by more than one principal open is needed.

So the inclusion of the punctured affine line over the affine line is the simplest instance of Zariski's main theorem in its open form: the quasi-finite algebra is already a principal localisation of the finite R-algebra R itself, and the open image is the principal open D(t). The Axiom of Choice is recorded only because the general factorization theorem is invoked in part 2; the fibre computation and the display Tt=S are explicit and choice-free.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the polynomial ring R=k[t], the principal localisation S=Rt=k[t,t−1] of R at t, and the Axiom of Choice.

[L1]

The map R→S is quasi-finite at q when Sq/pSq is finite over κ(p), the map is quasi-finite when it is of finite type and quasi-finite at every prime, and the fibre of Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(R) over p is Spec⁡(S⊗Rκ(p)), the local ring at the prime over p being Sq/pSq (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra).

[L2]

An R-algebra A is of finite type over R when A=R[a1,…,an] for finitely many elements, and module-finite over R when it is finitely generated as an R-module (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).

[L3]

For f∈R the principal localisation is Rf=Sf−1R with Sf={1,f,f2,…}, and its elements may be written r/fn; in particular R1 is canonically isomorphic to R (Principal localisation Rf={1,f,f2,…}−1R).

[L4]

For f∈R the localisation map R→Rf induces a homeomorphism from Spec⁡(Rf) onto the distinguished open subset D(f) (The spectrum of a principal localisation is the distinguished open D(f)).

[L5]

For a unital ring map A→C and a multiplicative subset M⊆A there is a ring isomorphism (M−1A)⊗AC≅M‾−1C, with no flatness, finite-generation or nonzero-ring hypothesis (Presentations and localization under base extension).

[L6]

For multiplicative subsets S,T⊆R, with Tˉ the image of T in S−1R and U generated by S∪T, there is an isomorphism Tˉ−1(S−1R)≅U−1R (Localising twice is localising once at the multiplicative set generated by both denominator sets).

[L7]

For a prime ideal p of R there is a canonical field isomorphism Rp/pRp≅Frac⁡(R/p), the residue field κ(p) (Rp/pRp≅Frac⁡(R/p) is the residue field at p).

[L8]

Contraction along the localisation map R→S−1R is an inclusion-preserving bijection from Spec⁡(S−1R) onto the primes of R disjoint from S, with inverse p↦S−1p (Prime ideals of a localization are exactly the primes disjoint from the denominator set).

[L9]

Assume the Axiom of Choice. If R→S is of finite type and quasi-finite at every prime of S and S′ is the integral closure of the image of R in S, then there are a finite R-subalgebra T⊆S′ and finitely many g1,…,gn∈T with the contraction map Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(T) a homeomorphism onto the open set U=DT(g1)∪⋯∪DT(gn), Tgi≅Sgi, and Tg≅Sg for every g∈T with DT(g)⊆U (A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra).

[L10]

An element b of a commutative ring B is integral over a subring A⊆B when it is a root of a monic polynomial in A[X] (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers).

[L11]

For a unital ring map R→S the relative integral closure Int⁡R(S) is the subring of S consisting of the elements integral over the map; it contains the image of R and is the integral closure of that image in S (Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map).

[L12]

In the localisation S−1R two fractions are equal, r/s=r′/s′, if and only if v(rs′−r′s)=0 for some v∈S, and every s∈S maps to a unit (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S−1R as equivalence classes of fractions).

[L13]

If R is an integral domain then so is R[x]; in particular k[t] is a domain (A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain).

[L14]

The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the statement that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Take R=k[t] and S=Rt=k[t,t−1], the principal localisation of R at t as in [L3], and note S≠0 since R is a domain by [L13] and a localisation of a nonzero ring at a nonzerodivisor is nonzero: if r/tn=0 then tmr=0 for some m≥0 by [L12], whence r=0. The localisation map R→S is injective by the same computation, so we may view R⊆S. Every element of S is of the form r/tn, that is r⋅(1/t)n, so S=R[1/t] is generated as an R-algebra by the single element 1/t; hence R→S is of finite type by [L2].

givenL2L3L12L13
2.1

We compute the fibres. Let p∈Spec⁡(R) and apply [L5] with A=R, C=κ(p) and the multiplicative subset M={1,t,t2,…} of R, whose image in κ(p) is generated by the image of t: S⊗Rκ(p)=(M−1R)⊗Rκ(p)≅M‾−1κ(p)=κ(p)t. By [L7] the field κ(p) is Frac⁡(R/p), so the image of t in κ(p) is zero exactly when t∈p. If t∈p, then inverting the zero element of a ring gives the zero ring, so κ(p)t=0 and therefore S⊗Rκ(p)=0; if t∉p, then the image of t in the field κ(p) is a nonzero element, hence a unit, and then every fraction r/tn=r(t−1)n already lies in κ(p), so κ(p)t=κ(p).

givenstep 1.1L5L7
2.2

For part 2 put T:=R, viewed as a subring of S by step 1.1. Then T is module-finite over R because it is generated as an R-module by the single element 1, hence a finite R-algebra in the sense of [L2]. Every element r∈R is integral over R, being a root of the monic polynomial X−r∈R[X] by [L10]; so R⊆Int⁡R(S)=S′ by [L11], and T=R is a finite R-subalgebra of S′.

givenstep 1.1L2L10L11
3.1

By the fibre form of [L1] the fibre of Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(R) over p is Spec⁡(S⊗Rκ(p)). Hence by step 2.1 the fibre over the prime (t) is Spec⁡(0)=∅, in particular S⊗Rκ((t))=0 and no prime of S lies over (t), while over every p with t∉p the fibre is Spec⁡(κ(p)), a single point. This matches [L8], which shows that the primes of S=Rt are exactly the primes of R not containing t.

givenstep 2.1L1L8
3.2

With g:=t∈T we have Tt=Rt=S by [L3] and St=S, since t is already invertible in S=Rt; and g∉q for every q∈Spec⁡(S) by [L8]. The contraction map Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(T)=Spec⁡(R) is a homeomorphism onto DR(t) by [L4] applied to f=t, which is the open set U=DT(t); this is exactly the configuration of [L9] with n=1, g1=t and a single principal open.

givenstep 2.2L3L4L8L9
4.1

We compute the local fibres and quasi-finiteness. Let q∈Spec⁡(S) and let p=q∩R be its contraction; by [L8] we have t∉p. Localizing S=Rt at q is the same as localizing R at the image of R∖p, because t∈R∖p and therefore the multiplicative set generated by t and R∖p is just R∖p, by [L6]. Every s=r/tn∈S outside q has r∉p, so it becomes a unit after localizing by R∖p; conversely every element of R∖p maps outside q. Thus the two localizations have the same universal property and Sq=(Rt)q≅Rp, an isomorphism of R-algebras carrying the extension of p to the extension of p. It follows that Sq/pSq≅Rp/pRp≅κ(p) by [L7]. This is finite over the field κ(p), of dimension one; by [L1] the map R→S is quasi-finite at q, and since q was arbitrary and R→S is of finite type by step 1.1, the map is quasi-finite.

givenstep 1.1step 3.1L1L6L7L8
5.1

Part 1 is proved by steps 1.1, 2.1 and 4.1: the map is finite type and quasi-finite, the fibre over (t) is empty with S⊗Rκ((t))=0, over every other prime the fibre ring is κ(p), and the local fibre at the prime above p is that same field.

step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1
6.1

The Axiom of Choice was recorded in the Statement for the same reason it appears in [L9], namely the general factorization theorem invoked in step 3.2; the computations of steps 1.1, 2.1, 4.1, 2.2 and 3.2 manipulate finitely many explicit elements (t, 1/t, the fractions r/tn) and no family of nonempty sets is selected anywhere. This proves both parts. ∎

givenstep 3.2L9L14
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-27Open item page →

A finite algebra is its own Zariski Main factor

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let R→S be a ring map such that S is a finite R-algebra, that is module-finite over R (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras). Then:

  1. The integral closure S′=Int⁡R(S) of the image of R in S (Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map) is all of S.

  2. In the local form of Zariski's main theorem (Algebraic Zariski Main localization at a quasi-finite prime) the element g:=1 witnesses the conclusion at every prime: 1∉q for every q∈Spec⁡(S) and S1′=S1=S=S1.

  3. In the finite factorization theorem (A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra) one may take T:=S: this is a finite R-subalgebra of S′ that equals S′, the contraction map Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(T) is the identity of Spec⁡(S), its image Spec⁡(S) is open, and the cover of the theorem may be the single principal open DT(1)=Spec⁡(T) (Distinguished-subset identities).

Thus for a module-finite algebra the local element, the finite factor and the open piece are the trivial ones: the relative integral closure is the whole algebra, nothing needs to be inverted, and the factorization is the identity. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the two general theorems cited in parts 2 and 3; the direct verification below uses the finite-module criterion for integrality and requires no choice.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A ring map R→S such that S is module-finite over R, i.e. a finite R-algebra, with A=Im⁡(R)⊆S the image of the structure map, and the Axiom of Choice.

[L1]

An R-algebra A is module-finite over R when it is finitely generated as an R-module (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).

[L2]

An element b of a commutative ring B is integral over a subring A⊆B when it is a root of a monic polynomial in A[X] (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers).

[L3]

The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the statement that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[L4]

Let A⊆B be commutative rings with A≠0 and b∈B. Then b is integral over A if and only if there exists a faithful A[b]-module that is finitely generated over A, faithfulness meaning that rM=0 implies r=0 for r∈A[b] (Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element).

[L5]

For a unital ring map R→S the relative integral closure Int⁡R(S) is the subring of S of elements integral over the map; it contains the image of R and is exactly the integral closure of that image in S (Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map).

[L6]

A proper ideal P⊊R is prime when ab∈P implies a∈P or b∈P (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).

[L7]

For f∈R the principal localisation is Rf=Sf−1R with Sf={1,f,f2,…}; in particular R1 is canonically isomorphic to R (Principal localisation Rf={1,f,f2,…}−1R).

[L8]

For every ring homomorphism φ:R→A contraction defines a continuous map Spec⁡(A)→Spec⁡(R), and Spec⁡ is a contravariant functor, so the identity ring map induces the identity on spectra (The prime-spectrum construction is a contravariant functor to topological spaces).

[L9]

The subsets V(I) of Spec⁡(R) contain Spec⁡(R) and ∅ and define a topology on Spec⁡(R) (The vanishing sets define the Zariski topology on the prime spectrum).

[L10]

For f∈R one has D(0)=∅ and D(1)=Spec⁡(R), and D(fg)=D(f)∩D(g) (Distinguished-subset identities).

[L11]

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a finite type map R→S quasi-finite at q∈Spec⁡(S) there is g∈S′∖q with S′→S inducing an isomorphism Sg′≅Sg (Algebraic Zariski Main localization at a quasi-finite prime).

[L12]

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a finite type map R→S quasi-finite at every prime, with S′ the integral closure of the image of R in S, there are a finite R-subalgebra T⊆S′ and finitely many g1,…,gn∈T with the contraction map Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(T) a homeomorphism onto the open set U=DT(g1)∪⋯∪DT(gn), Tgi≅Sgi, and Tg≅Sg whenever DT(g)⊆U (A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

We assume the Axiom of Choice as recorded in [L3]. By hypothesis S is finitely generated as an R-module by [L1], and A=Im⁡(R)⊆S is the image of the structure map. If A=0 then 1S=φ(1R)=0, so S=0 and every element of S is trivially integral over R; assume from now on that A≠0.

givenL1L3
2.1

Fix b∈S. Then S is an A[b]-module through the subalgebra A[b]⊆S, and it is finitely generated over A because it is finitely generated over R and A is a quotient of R: the same finite generating set works. Moreover S is a faithful A[b]-module, because rS=0 for r∈A[b] forces r=r⋅1S=0. By [L4] applied to A⊆S and the element b, the element b is integral over A in the sense of [L2]. As b∈S was arbitrary, every element of S is integral over the map R→S, and since S′=Int⁡R(S) consists exactly of those elements by [L5], we get S′=S. This is part 1.

givenstep 1.1L1L2L4L5
3.1

For part 2 let q∈Spec⁡(S). Since q is a proper ideal by [L6] we have 1∉q; and S′=S by step 2.1, so S1′=S1=S=S1 by [L7]. Hence the triple (S′,g)=(S,1) satisfies the conclusion of [L11] at every prime q: the localisation S′→S at the element 1 is an isomorphism.

givenstep 2.1L6L7L11
3.2

For part 3 put T:=S. Then T is module-finite over R by [L1], that is a finite R-algebra, and T=S=S′ is a finite R-subalgebra of S′ by step 2.1. The contraction map Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(T) induced by the identity ring map S→T=S is the identity of Spec⁡(S) by [L8], its image Spec⁡(S) is open in itself by [L9], and the single principal open DT(1) equals Spec⁡(T) by [L10]. Finally T1=T=S=S1 by [L7], so the data T=S, n=1, g1=1, U=Spec⁡(T) satisfy all the assertions (1) and (2) of [L12].

givenstep 2.1L1L7L8L9L10L12
4.1

The Axiom of Choice was used only through the two general theorems cited in steps 3.1 and 3.2, namely [L11] and [L12]; the direct verification of parts 1 to 3 above (the finite-module criterion of [L4], the element 1, the algebra T=S, and the identities S1′=S1=S, DT(1)=Spec⁡(T)) manipulates finitely many explicit objects and selects nothing. This proves all three parts. ∎

givenstep 2.1step 3.1step 3.2L3L11L12
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-27Open item page →

Quasi-finite does not imply finite

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field, let R=k[t] and let B=k[t,t−1]=Rt be the principal localisation of R at t (Principal localisation Rf={1,f,f2,…}−1R). Let S=R×B be the product ring (The product ring R×S with componentwise operations, its identity (1R,1S) and its units R××S×) with the diagonal R-algebra structure r↦(r,r), and put u:=(0,t−1)∈S,e:=(1,0)∈S,tˉ:=(t,t)∈S. Then:

  1. Finite type. tˉ u=1S−e, and S=R[u]=R[e,u]; hence R→S is a ring map of finite type (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).

  2. Fibres. For p∈Spec⁡(R) the fibre (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra) is S⊗Rκ((t))≅k over the prime (t), and S⊗Rκ(p)≅κ(p)×κ(p) over every prime p with t∉p. In particular every fibre of Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(R) is finite, of one or two points.

  3. Quasi-finite. R→S is quasi-finite at every prime of S: for q∈Spec⁡(S) with contraction p=q∩R one has Sq/pSq≅κ(p).

  4. Not finite. S is not module-finite over R, that is, not a finite R-algebra (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras). So a quasi-finite finite-type algebra need not be finite.

  5. The finite factor. The relative integral closure (Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map) is S′=Int⁡R(S)=R×R, which is module-finite over R, and with g:=(1,t)∈S′ one has Sg′=Sg=S: a single element inverts the whole difference, and the contraction map Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(S′) is a homeomorphism onto the open set DS′(g), whose two pieces are the whole first component of Spec⁡(R×R) and D(t) inside the second one. This is the configuration of A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra and Quasi-finite algebras are source locally localizations of finite algebras with one element working at every prime of S at once.

The Axiom of Choice is recorded because the two general factorization theorems cited in part 5 assume it; every computation of this item is performed on finitely many named elements and needs no choice.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the polynomial ring R=k[t], the principal localisation B=k[t,t−1]=Rt of R at t, the product ring S=R×B with the diagonal R-algebra structure r↦(r,r), the elements u=(0,t−1), e=(1,0) and tˉ=(t,t) of S, and the Axiom of Choice.

[L1]

For a commutative ring R the polynomial ring R[x] is the set of finitely supported coefficient functions with convolution product, the indeterminate x being the coefficient function supported at 1 with value 1R (The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution).

[L2]

If R is an integral domain then R[x] is an integral domain; in particular k[t] is a domain with 0≠1 (A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain).

[L3]

A field is a commutative unital ring with 0≠1 in which every nonzero element has a multiplicative inverse (Field).

[L4]

The product ring R×B carries componentwise operations and identity (1R,1B), and (u,v) is a unit of R×B if and only if u and v are units, with (u,v)−1=(u−1,v−1) (The product ring R×S with componentwise operations, its identity (1R,1S) and its units R××S×).

[L5]

For f∈R the principal localisation is Rf=Sf−1R with Sf={1,f,f2,…}, its elements may be written r/fn, R1 is canonically isomorphic to R, and R0 is the zero ring (Principal localisation Rf={1,f,f2,…}−1R).

[L6]

In a localisation S−1R the classes are fractions r/s, two fractions are equal exactly when u(rs′−r′s)=0 for some u∈S, every s∈S maps to a unit with (s/1)−1=1/s, and if 0∈S the localisation is the zero ring (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S−1R as equivalence classes of fractions).

[L7]

Let A be a commutative R-algebra. For a1,…,an∈A its image under the evaluation homomorphism is written R[a1,…,an] and is the smallest subring of A containing the image of R and the ai; A is of finite type over R when A=R[a1,…,an] for finitely many elements, and module-finite over R when A is finitely generated as an R-module (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).

[L8]

For 0≠f∈R[x] the degree deg⁡f is the largest n with an≠0 and lc⁡(f)=adeg⁡f; the zero polynomial has no degree (Degree, leading coefficient and monic polynomial, with the zero polynomial having no degree).

[L9]

For nonzero f,g∈R[x] the coefficient of xdeg⁡f+deg⁡g in fg is lc⁡(f)lc⁡(g), and if fg≠0 then deg⁡(fg)≤deg⁡f+deg⁡g (Degree inequalities for sums and products over a commutative ring).

[L10]

An element b of a commutative ring B is integral over a subring A⊆B when it is a root of a monic polynomial in A[X] (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers).

[L11]

For a unital ring map R→S with image φ(R), the relative integral closure Int⁡R(S) is the set of s∈S satisfying a monic equation sd+φ(ad−1)sd−1+⋯+φ(a0)=0, and it is a subring of S containing φ(R) (Integral elements subalgebra of an arbitrary ring map).

[L12]

A domain A is integrally closed when every element of Frac⁡(A) that is integral over A already lies in A (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).

[L13]

For an integral domain D the field of fractions is Frac⁡(D)=(D∖{0})−1D, with elements fractions a/b for a,b∈D, b≠0 (The field of fractions Frac⁡(D)=(D∖{0})−1D of an integral domain).

[L14]

If R is an integrally closed domain then the polynomial ring R[x] is integrally closed (Polynomial rings over normal domains are normal).

[L15]

Let A⊆B be commutative rings with A≠0 and let b∈B. Then b is integral over A if and only if A[b] is finitely generated as an A-module (Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element).

[L16]

For a prime p of R there is a canonical field isomorphism Rp/pRp≅Frac⁡(R/p); this is the residue field κ(p) (Rp/pRp≅Frac⁡(R/p) is the residue field at p).

[L17]

For commutative rings R,S, a unital ring map φ:R→S and s∈S there is a unique unital ring homomorphism ev⁡φ,s:R[x]→S extending φ on constants and sending x to s, given by ev⁡φ,s(∑iaixi)=∑iφ(ai)si (Universal property of R[x]: a coefficient homomorphism and the image of x determine a unique ring homomorphism).

[L18]

If g∈R[x] is monic and f∈R[x], there are unique q,r∈R[x] with f=qg+r and r=0 or deg⁡r<deg⁡g (Division by a monic polynomial over a commutative ring).

[L19]

A ring homomorphism with kernel I induces an isomorphism from R/I onto its image (First isomorphism theorem for rings: R/ker⁡f≅im⁡f).

[L20]

For a family of R-modules (Mi) and an R-module N there is a natural isomorphism ⨁i(Mi⊗RN)≅(⨁iMi)⊗RN; in particular tensoring distributes over finite direct sums (Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums).

[L21]

For every R-module N the multiplication map R⊗RN→N, r⊗n↦rn, is an isomorphism (The regular module is a tensor unit: R⊗RN≅N and M⊗RR≅M).

[L22]

For a unital ring map A→C and a multiplicative subset M⊆A there is a ring isomorphism (M−1A)⊗AC≅M‾−1C, where M‾ is the image of M in C (Presentations and localization under base extension).

[L23]

For a finite-type map R→S and q∈Spec⁡(S) with p=q∩R, the map is quasi-finite at q when Sq/pSq is finite over κ(p), and quasi-finite when it is finite type and quasi-finite at every prime; the fibre over p is Spec⁡(S⊗Rκ(p)), the prime q determines a prime q‾ of the fibre, and the local ring of the fibre at that prime is Sq/pSq, either description being usable as the definition (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra).

[L24]

For f∈R the principal distinguished subset is D(f)={p∈Spec⁡(R):f∉p} (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum).

[L25]

For a multiplicative subset S⊆R contraction along the localisation map R→S−1R is a homeomorphism from Spec⁡(S−1R) onto {p∈Spec⁡(R):p∩S=∅} (The spectrum of a localisation is the subspace of primes disjoint from the denominator set).

[L26]

Let R be a commutative ring, I⊴R an ideal and π:R→R/I the quotient map. Then contraction along π is a homeomorphism from Spec⁡(R/I) onto the closed subset V(I)⊆Spec⁡(R) (The spectrum of a quotient is a closed subspace).

[L27]

Contraction along a ring map is a continuous map, Spec⁡(id⁡R)=id⁡Spec⁡(R) and Spec⁡(ψ∘φ)=Spec⁡(φ)∘Spec⁡(ψ) (The prime-spectrum construction is a contravariant functor to topological spaces).

[L28]

The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[L29]

Assume the Axiom of Choice. If R→S is finite type and quasi-finite at every prime of S, with S′ the integral closure of the image of R in S, then there are a finite R-subalgebra T⊆S′ that is module-finite over R and finitely many g1,…,gn∈T with U=DT(g1)∪⋯∪DT(gn) open, the contraction map Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(T) a homeomorphism onto U, and Tgi→Sgi an isomorphism for every i; moreover for every g∈T with DT(g)⊆U the inclusion induces an isomorphism Tg→Sg (A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra).

[L30]

Assume the Axiom of Choice. If R→S is finite type and quasi-finite at every prime of S, then for every q∈Spec⁡(S) there are a finite R-subalgebra T⊆S′ of the relative integral closure, module-finite over R, and an element g∈T with g∉q such that Tg≅Sg (Quasi-finite algebras are source locally localizations of finite algebras).

[L31]

A proper ideal P⊊R is prime when ab∈P implies a∈P or b∈P; in particular every prime ideal is proper and a unit of R lies in no prime ideal (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).

[L32]

A two-sided ideal I⊴R of a ring R is an additive subgroup of (R,+) with ri∈I for every r∈R and i∈I; in a commutative ring the left, right and two-sided ideals agree (Left, right and two-sided ideals).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Take the field k, the polynomial ring R=k[t] with indeterminate t [L1], and B=Rt={1,t,t2,…}−1R=k[t,t−1] [L5]. The ring R is a domain with 0≠1 [L2], and B is a localisation of it. Let S=R×B be the product ring [L4], a commutative unital ring, and let φ:R→S, r↦(r,r) be the diagonal map: it is a unital ring homomorphism because the operations of S are componentwise [L4], and it is injective, since (r,r)=0 forces r=0 by componentwise equality [L4]. Thus S is a commutative R-algebra with S≠0.

givenL1L2L4L5
1.2

We record the prime ideals of a product ring. Let A and C be commutative rings and put e=(1,0), f=(0,1) in A×C; then e+f=1 and ef=0, and for (a,b)∈A×C the componentwise operations [L4] give e(a,b)=(a,0) and f(a,b)=(0,b). Let P be a prime ideal of A×C. Since ef=0∈P, [L31] gives e∈P or f∈P; not both, because then 1=e+f∈P would contradict the properness of a prime ideal [L31]. Suppose f∈P and put I={a∈A:(a,0)∈P}; this is an ideal of A: if (a,0),(a′,0)∈P then (a+a′,0)=(a,0)+(a′,0)∈P, and if r∈A and (a,0)∈P then (ra,0)=r(a,0)∈P, because P is an additive subgroup of A×C closed under multiplication by elements of A×C [L4, L32]. For (a,b)∈P the identity (0,b)=f(a,b) shows (0,b)∈P, hence (a,0)=(a,b)−(0,b)∈P; conversely, if (a,0)∈P then (a,b)=(a,0)+f(0,b) is a sum of two elements of P. Hence P=I×C, and I is prime: it is proper, since (1,0)∈P would give 1=(1,0)+(0,1)∈P; and if rs∈I for r,s∈A, then (r,0)(s,0)=(rs,0)∈P, so r∈I or s∈I [L31]. Symmetrically, if e∈P then P=A×J with J={b∈C:(0,b)∈P} a prime ideal of C. Conversely, if I⊆A is a prime ideal then I×C is a prime ideal of A×C: it is proper because 1∉I, and (a,b)(a′,b′)=(aa′,bb′)∈I×C forces aa′∈I, hence a∈I or a′∈I, that is (a,b)∈I×C or (a′,b′)∈I×C [L4, L31]; symmetrically A×J is prime for a prime ideal J⊆C. Hence the prime ideals of a product ring A×C are exactly the ideals I×C with I prime in A and the ideals A×J with J prime in C.

givenL4L31L32
2.1

Put u:=(0,t−1)∈S, e:=(1,0)∈S and tˉ:=φ(t)=(t,t). Multiplying, tˉ u=(t,t)(0,t−1)=(0,1)=1S−e [L4]. We claim S=R[u]. First, every element of B=Rt is of the form ∑i=0nait−i with ai∈R: an element of Rt is r/tn [L5], and writing r=∑j=0dcjtj in R=k[t] [L1] gives r/tn=∑j<ncjtj−n+∑j≥ncjtj−n, where the second sum lies in R and the first is ∑i=1ncn−it−i [L1]. Second, for g=a0+∑i=1nait−i∈B and f∈R one has (f,g)=(f−a0)e+φ(a0)+∑i=1nφ(ai)ui: indeed ui=(0,t−i) and multiplication by φ(ai)=(ai,ai) is componentwise [L4], while φ is the structure map [step 1.1]. Hence every element of S is a polynomial in u with coefficients in the image of R, so S=R[u]=R[e,u] because e=1S−tˉ u is itself a polynomial in u; therefore R→S is of finite type [L7]. This proves part 1.

givenstep 1.1L1L4L5L7
2.2

The element (1,t)∈S has inverse (1,t−1) because t−1∈B is the inverse of t∈B [L5] and units multiply componentwise [L4]: (1,t)(1,t−1)=(1,1)=1S. In particular t is a unit of B, so Bt=B.

givenstep 1.1L4L5
2.3

We compute the residue fields of R=k[t]. By [L16] with p=(t) we have κ((t))≅Frac⁡(R/(t)), the residue field being defined by that isomorphism. The evaluation map ev⁡k,0:R=k[t]→k, ∑iaiti↦a0, is the ring homomorphism of [L17] for φ=id⁡k and s=0; it is surjective, since it is the identity on constants. Its kernel is exactly the principal ideal (t): for f=∑iaiti the division of [L18] by the monic polynomial g=t=x gives unique q,r with f=qt+r and r=0 or deg⁡r<1, that is r=c a constant, and evaluating gives c=f(0); hence f(0)=0 if and only if r=0, that is t∣f. So [L19] gives R/(t)≅k, and then κ((t))≅Frac⁡(k)=k by [L13] and [L3]: the field of fractions of a field is the field itself, because all its nonzero elements are already units. Moreover the image of t in κ((t)) is zero, since t∈(t) and R→R/(t)→Frac⁡(R/(t)) is the canonical composite.

givenstep 1.1L3L13L16L17L18L19
3.1

The underlying additive group of S=R×B is the direct sum R⊕B, the R-module structure being componentwise [L4]. Let p∈Spec⁡(R) and put κ:=κ(p). Tensoring the decomposition with κ over R and applying [L20] and [L21] gives S⊗Rκ≅(R⊗Rκ)⊕(B⊗Rκ)≅κ⊕(B⊗Rκ), and applying [L22] to the multiplicative subset M={1,t,t2,…}⊆R with A=R and C=κ gives B⊗Rκ=Rt⊗Rκ≅κt, the principal localisation of the field κ at the image of t [L5]. Now take p=(t): the element t maps to 0∈κ((t)) by step 2.3, and inverting the zero element of a ring gives the zero ring [L6], so κ((t))t=0 and S⊗Rκ((t))≅κ((t))⊕0≅k by step 2.3.

givenstep 1.1step 2.3L4L5L6L20L21L22
3.2

Suppose, for contradiction, that S is module-finite over R, that is, finitely generated as an R-module [L7]. By step 2.1 we have S=R[u], so R[u] is a finitely generated R-module, and the image φ(R) of R in S is nonzero by step 1.1; applying the equivalence of [L15] with A=φ(R)≅R and b=u — the module structure being the one transported along φ [L7] — we conclude that u is integral over φ(R). By [L10] and [L11] there are n≥1 and a0,…,an−1∈R with un+φ(an−1)un−1+⋯+φ(a0)=0 in S.

givenstep 1.1step 2.1L7L10L11L15
3.3

We compute the relative integral closure S′=Int⁡R(S) [L11]. First let (f,g)∈S be integral over φ(R). The second projection π2:S=R×B→B, (a,b)↦b, is a unital ring homomorphism — the operations are componentwise [L4] — and it carries φ(a)=(a,a) to a, so applying it to a monic equation for (f,g) over φ(R) produces a monic equation for g over R [L10, L11]; that is, g is integral over R. Now B=Rt⊆Frac⁡(R): every element of B is a fraction r/tn with r∈R and tn≠0 [L5, L13]. The field k is an integrally closed domain, since Frac⁡(k)=k by [L3, L13] and every element of k lies in k [L12]; hence R=k[t] is an integrally closed domain by [L14]. So the element g∈Frac⁡(R), being integral over R, lies in R. The first coordinate f lies in R by the definition of S [L4]. Conversely, let f,g∈R; then (f,g)=φ(g)+(f−g)e, where φ(g)=(g,g) lies in the image of R and hence in S′ [L11], while e=(1,0) is integral over φ(R) because e2−e=0 [L4, L10], and (f−g)e is a product of two elements of the subring S′ [L11]. Hence (f,g)∈S′, and S′=R×R={φ(g)+(h,0):g,h∈R}.

givenstep 1.1step 2.1L3L4L5L10L11L12L13L14
4.1

Now let p∈Spec⁡(R) with t∉p and again put κ=κ(p)≅Frac⁡(R/p) [L16]. The image of t in R/p is nonzero, because R/p is a domain [L2] and t∉p, so its image in the field κ is a nonzero element, hence a unit [L3]. Therefore every fraction r/tn of κt already lies in κ [L5], so the localisation map κ→κt is surjective as well as injective, that is κt=κ; with step 3.1 this gives S⊗Rκ≅κ⊕κ≅κ×κ as rings, a product of two copies of the residue field. This proves part 2.

givenstep 3.1L2L3L5L16
4.2

We verify quasi-finiteness at a prime in the case p=(t). Let q∈Spec⁡(S) with q∩R=(t). By [L23] the quotient Sq/pSq is the local ring of the fibre Spec⁡(S⊗Rκ(p)) at the prime q‾ determined by q, and by step 3.1 the fibre ring is the field k. A prime ideal of k is proper, and no unit of a ring lies in a prime ideal — if u∈P were a unit then 1=u u−1∈P — [L31, L32], while every nonzero element of the field k is a unit [L3]; hence every prime ideal of k is (0), and since the fibre has the prime q‾, that prime is (0). The local ring of the fibre there is therefore the localisation k(0)=(k∖{0})−1k at the prime (0), and every class a/s of that localisation equals a⋅s−1/1, because s≠0 is a unit of k [L3, L6]; so the localisation map k→k(0) is bijective and Hence Sq/pSq≅k=κ((t)) — the equality of fields being step 2.3 — a one-dimensional vector space over κ(p), hence a finite κ(p)-module [L23].

givenstep 2.3step 3.1L3L6L23L31L32
4.3

We compute that equation in the two coordinates of S=R×B [L4]. Since ui=(0,t−i) and φ(ai)=(ai,ai), the second coordinate of the equation is t−n+an−1t−(n−1)+⋯+a1t−1+a0=0 in B. Multiplying this equation by tn∈B gives 1+an−1t+⋯+a1tn−1+a0tn=0 in B. All terms of this equation lie in the subring R⊆B, and R→B=Rt is injective: if r/1=0 in B, then tmr=0 in the domain R for some m, so r=0, by the fraction criterion [L6, L2]. Hence the equation holds in R, and 1=−t (an−1+an−2t+⋯+a1tn−2+a0tn−1), that is 1∈tR.

givenstep 3.2L2L4L5L6
4.4

Put T:=S′=R×R. As an R-module, T is generated by (1,0) and (0,1): every (g,h)∈R×R is (g,h)=g⋅(1,0)+h⋅(0,1) with the componentwise action [L4]. Hence T is a finite R-algebra [L7], in particular a finite R-subalgebra of S′ in the sense of [L29].

step 3.3L4L7
5.1

We verify quasi-finiteness at a prime in the case t∉p, where p=q∩R. By step 4.1 the fibre ring is K×K with K:=κ(p) a field [L3], and by step 1.2, applied to the product ring K×K, its prime ideals are exactly K×0 and 0×K. Let P:=K×0; the multiplicative set of the localisation at P is the complement M={(a,b):b≠0}. In M−1(K×K) the element (0,1)∈M is a unit [L6] and (0,1)(1,0)=0 [L4], so (1,0)/1=0; consequently the map ψ:K→M−1(K×K), a↦(0,a)/1, is a well-defined unital ring homomorphism [L6], injective because (0,a)/1=0 means (c,d)(0,a)=(0,da)=0 for some (c,d)∈M, whence a=0 as d≠0 and K is a field [L3, L6], and surjective because every class in the localisation equals 0/1 or (0,b)/(c,d)=(0,b/d)/1 for d≠0, again by the fraction criterion [L6]. Hence the local ring of the fibre at the prime over P is K, and symmetrically the one at the prime over 0×K is K; both are one-dimensional over κ(p). By [L23] the map R→S is quasi-finite at every q∈Spec⁡(S).

givenstep 1.2step 4.1L3L4L6L23
5.2

We show 1∉tR. If 1=th for some h∈R, then h≠0 since 1≠0 in the domain R [L2], and deg⁡(t)=1 with lc⁡(t)=1 while deg⁡(1)=0 by [L8]. By [L9] the coefficient of x1+deg⁡h in th is lc⁡(t)lc⁡(h)=lc⁡(h)≠0, so deg⁡(th)≥1+deg⁡h≥1 and th≠0; but th=1 has degree 0, a contradiction. Hence 1∉tR, contradicting step 4.3, and S is not module-finite over R. This proves part 4.

step 4.3L2L8L9
5.3

Put g:=(1,t)∈T. For a product ring the localisation at a product element is the product of the localisations: the map θ:(A×A′)(f,f′)→Af×Af′′, (a,a′)/(f,f′)n↦(a/fn,a′/f′n), is well defined and a unital ring homomorphism by the fraction criterion [L6] and the componentwise operations [L4], it is injective because (f,f′)k(a,a′)=0 for some k means fka=0 and f′ka′=0, and it is surjective because (xfN−m,x′f′N−n)/(f,f′)N maps to (x/fm,x′/f′n) for N=max⁡{m,n}. Applying this with A=A′=R, f=1, f′=t and [L5] gives Tg=(R×R)(1,t)≅R1×Rt=R×B=S; applying it with A=R, A′=B and [L5] gives Sg=(R×B)(1,t)≅R1×Bt=R×B=S, since Bt=B by step 2.2. Both isomorphisms are the canonical maps induced by the inclusion T⊆S, so Tg=Sg=S and the inclusion T→S induces an isomorphism of principal localisations [L5].

givenstep 2.2step 3.3step 4.4L4L5L6
6.1

By step 2.1 the map R→S is of finite type and by steps 4.2 and 5.1 it is quasi-finite at every prime of S; hence it is quasi-finite [L23], and for every q with contraction p the quotient Sq/pSq is isomorphic to κ(p), as computed in steps 4.2 and 5.1. This proves part 3.

step 2.1step 4.2step 5.1L23
6.2

By step 1.2 the primes of S=R×B are exactly the ideals p×B with p∈Spec⁡(R) and the ideals R×q with q∈Spec⁡(B), and the primes of T=R×R are the ideals p×R and R×p′ with p,p′∈Spec⁡(R). For a prime q=p×B of S we compute q∩T=(p×B)∩(R×R)=p×R, and for q=R×q′ we get q∩T=R×(q′∩R) by the componentwise description of ideals of a product [L4]. Hence the image of the contraction map Spec⁡(S)→Spec⁡(T) is the union of the set of primes p×R, which is the entire first component of Spec⁡(T), and of the set of primes R×p′ with p′ in the image of the contraction Spec⁡(B)→Spec⁡(R). That contraction is the localisation map of R at M={1,t,t2,…}, so by [L25] its image is {p∈Spec⁡(R):p∩M=∅}=D(t) [L24, L5]. Finally, a prime p×R contains g=(1,t) only if 1∈p, which is impossible [L4], while R×p′ contains (1,t) exactly when t∈p′ [L4]; so the image is precisely the open set DT(g)={P∈Spec⁡(T):g∉P} [L24].

givenstep 1.2step 2.2step 5.3L4L5L24L25
7.1

We record the topological form of step 6.2. The first projection π1S:S→R of S=R×B is a surjective unital ring homomorphism with kernel 0×B, and the second projection π2S:S→B is surjective with kernel R×0 [L4]; by step 1.2 the primes of S are exactly the primes of the two complementary closed sets V(0×B)={p×B:p∈Spec⁡(R)} and V(R×0)={R×q:q∈Spec⁡(B)}, and the analogous statements hold for the projections π1T,π2T of T=R×R, whose kernels are 0×R and R×0. By [L26] the four contraction maps along these projections are homeomorphisms onto V(0×B), V(R×0), V(0×R) and V(R×0) respectively, while by functoriality [L27] the contraction map φ=Spec⁡(ι) along the inclusion ι:T→S satisfies φ∘Spec⁡(π1S)=Spec⁡(π1T) and φ∘Spec⁡(π2S)=Spec⁡(ιB∘π2T), where π2T:T→R is the second projection and ιB:R→B=Rt is the localisation map [L4, L5]. Consequently φ carries the piece V(0×B) homeomorphically onto the piece V(0×R)={p×R} of Spec⁡(T), and carries the piece V(R×0) homeomorphically onto the image of Spec⁡(ιB), which by [L25] is D(t)⊆Spec⁡(R) carried into the piece V(R×0)={R×p′} of Spec⁡(T). The two target pieces are disjoint by step 1.2, so φ is a homeomorphism onto their union, which is the open set DT(g) of step 6.2. Therefore the data T=S′=R×R, n=1 and g1=g=(1,t) satisfy the conclusion of part 1 of [L29]; and since g is a unit of S by step 2.2, it lies in no prime ideal of S [L31], so the same single element g witnesses the conclusion of [L30] at every prime of S simultaneously.

givenstep 1.2step 2.2step 5.3step 6.2L4L5L24L25L26L27L29L30L31
8.1

The Axiom of Choice [L28] is assumed in the Statement because the two general theorems invoked in step 7.1, namely [L29] and [L30], are stated with it; the proof above selects nothing. Every object used is named explicitly — the field k, the rings R, B, S, T, the elements u, e, tˉ, g, the primes p, q, P and the finitely many a0,…,an−1 of step 3.2 arise from fixed data, and the only localisations and tensor products are computed on finitely many explicit elements. Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are proved by steps 2.1; 3.1 with 4.1; 6.1; 5.2; and 3.3 with 4.4, 5.3, 6.2 and 7.1 respectively. ∎

givenstep 1.1step 3.2step 7.1L28L29L30

Sources