How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Polynomial rings over normal domains are normal
Statement
Let be an integrally closed domain (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains) with fraction field (The field of fractions of an integral domain). Then the polynomial ring (The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution) is integrally closed: every element of that is integral over (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers) already lies in .
No Noetherian hypothesis is imposed on : the proof reduces an arbitrary monic equation to a finitely generated -subalgebra of and proves that this subalgebra is Noetherian by a direct finite-generator argument. The argument is choice-free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integrally closed domain with fraction field , and an element integral over .
A domain is integrally closed when every element of integral over already lies in (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).
If is an integral domain then , and its elements are fractions with and (The field of fractions of an integral domain).
If is a unital homomorphism of commutative rings and is a unit of for every , then there is a unique unital ring homomorphism with , namely (Universal property of localisation: maps that invert factor uniquely through ).
If is an integral domain then is an integral domain (A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain).
For the degree is the largest with and the leading coefficient is ; the zero polynomial has no degree and no leading coefficient (Degree, leading coefficient and monic polynomial, with the zero polynomial having no degree).
Let be a commutative ring and nonzero. If then ; the coefficient of in is (Degree inequalities for sums and products over a commutative ring).
A domain has no zero divisors, so a product of nonzero elements is nonzero and cancellation of a nonzero factor is legitimate (Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with and no zero divisors).
Let be a field and not both zero. There are with , where is the monic greatest common divisor of , and divides both and (Bézout identity and the Euclidean algorithm for polynomials over a field).
Let be commutative rings with and . Then is integral over if and only if is finitely generated as an -module (Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element).
A commutative ring is Noetherian exactly when every ideal of it is finitely generated (Left and right Noetherian rings, Noetherian modules: every submodule is finitely generated).
In a commutative ring, consists of the finite sums with and , and the principal ideal equals ; the empty sum is included and equals (In a commutative ring, consists of finite sums , and ).
Every subgroup of equals for exactly one natural number (Every subgroup of is for exactly one natural number ).
For an ideal the canonical projection , , is a surjective ring homomorphism with kernel (The canonical projection is a surjective ring homomorphism with kernel ).
For , the maps and are inverse inclusion-preserving bijections between the ideals of containing and the ideals of (Correspondence theorem: ideals of correspond to ideals of containing ).
A subring contains and is closed under addition, negation and multiplication (Subring: a subset containing and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication).
Proof
We first prove the field case. Let be a field and let be integral over ; here is a domain by [L4], so [L2] lets us write with and . If then . Otherwise are not both zero, so [L8] provides and the monic greatest common divisor with , and . Write and with . The polynomial is monic, hence nonzero, so cancellation in the domain of [L4] gives from , and the same cancellation in gives .
Let be a domain with fraction field . Call an element almost integral over when there is a nonzero with for every integer . Every element of is almost integral over with multiplier , the fraction field of being that of [L2] and being a domain in the sense of [L7]. This is a convention internal to the proof; the following steps establish the three properties of it that the argument uses.
Every ideal of is an additive subgroup of , hence equals for some natural number by [L12] and [L11]. So every ideal of is finitely generated and is Noetherian by [L10].
Now let be a commutative ring in which every ideal is finitely generated, and let be an ideal. For let be the set consisting of and of the leading coefficients of all elements of of degree [L5], and put [L11]; then , since , and is an ideal of . By hypothesis for finitely many [L11], and each for some because is the union of the ; with this gives . For each the ideal is finitely generated and is generated by , so finitely many elements of , say the leading coefficients of polynomials of degree , generate [L11]. Let be the finite set of all these polynomials for .
Let be a commutative ring in which every ideal is finitely generated, let be an ideal and let be an ideal. By [L14] the preimage is an ideal of containing and , and is finitely generated, say ; by [L13] the projection is surjective, so is generated by the images [L11]. Hence every ideal of is finitely generated.
Let with and be a monic equation for over , which exists because is integral over . Substituting and multiplying by gives , so by [L11]. Raising to the -th power and expanding by the binomial theorem, every term of the expansion contains a factor or a factor , so for suitable ; by [L11] both summands lie in the ideal , so , say with . Then . Hence every element of integral over lies in : for every field the ring is integrally closed in its fraction field.
Let be almost integral over with multipliers . Then by [L7], and for every one has and , each summand being a product of two elements of . So the almost integral elements of form a subring of containing .
Let be integral over . By [L9] the ring is a finitely generated -module; choose generators and write with and by [L2]. Then by [L7] and for every , so ; in particular for all . Hence every element of integral over is almost integral over .
Suppose every ideal of is finitely generated and is almost integral over with multiplier . Then , since for every and is a -submodule of . Multiplication by is an injective -module map , because is a field and , and its image is an ideal of ; by hypothesis for some [L11]. Then inside : each lies in because for some and cancellation in gives , while for the identity with gives . So is a finitely generated -module and [L9] makes integral over . Consequently, over a domain in which every ideal is finitely generated, almost integral and integral elements of the fraction field coincide.
We show that the finite set generates . Let be nonzero of degree and leading coefficient [L5], and put . The leading coefficient lies in , and : for this is , and for it holds because . So with [L11]. Every has degree , and the polynomial lies in , is congruent to modulo , and has degree by [L6]. Induction on therefore exhibits every element of as an element of ; hence is finitely generated, and every ideal of is finitely generated.
Let be a commutative ring in which every ideal is finitely generated, let be a commutative -algebra and let . The -subalgebra of generated by is the image of the evaluation homomorphism with , hence is a quotient of ; iterating step 1.4 and applying step 1.5, every ideal of it is finitely generated. In particular, taking and using step 1.3, every -subalgebra of a commutative ring that is generated by finitely many elements is Noetherian by [L10].
Let be a domain with fraction field and let with be almost integral over , with multiplier and . For every the coefficient of in the product is by [L6], and , so ; thus is almost integral over with multiplier . Then is almost integral over with the same multiplier, because , and by step 2.2 the difference , which has degree , is almost integral over as well. Induction on and on the degree of therefore shows that every coefficient of is almost integral over .
Now return to the given data: is an integrally closed domain with fraction field [L1], and is integral over . The rings are domains by [L4], is a field, and the inclusion carries every nonzero element of to a unit, so by [L3] it extends uniquely to a unital ring homomorphism , ; this map is injective because its restriction to the domain is injective. We therefore regard as an element of . The monic equation for over is in particular a monic equation over , so is integral over , and step 2.1 applied to the field gives . Write with .
Choose a monic equation with all , and write each with and by [L2]. Let be the -subalgebra generated by the finitely many coefficients of the polynomials together with all the elements . Then is a subring of containing , hence a domain by [L15] and [L7], and every ideal of is finitely generated by step 2.6 applied with and step 1.3. Moreover with and , so [L2], and ; since all coefficients of the lie in , the displayed monic equation has coefficients in . Thus is integral over .
Let be a domain in which every ideal is finitely generated, put , and let be integral over . Then every coefficient of is integral over : the ring is a domain by [L4] and lies in its fraction field , so step 2.3 makes almost integral over ; step 3.1 makes each coefficient of almost integral over ; and step 2.4 turns almost integrality over into integrality over .
By step 4.1 applied to the domain , in which every ideal is finitely generated, each coefficient of is integral over . The monic polynomial over witnessing this has coefficients in , so each is integral over ; since is integrally closed in [L1], each lies in .
Consequently . Since the homomorphism of step 3.2 is injective and restricts to the identity on , every element of integral over is already an element of : the polynomial ring is an integrally closed domain by [L1] and [L4], for every integrally closed domain and with no Noetherian hypothesis on . ∎
Depends on
- Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains
- Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers
- The field of fractions $\operatorname{Frac}(D)=(D\setminus\{0\})^{-1}D$ of an integral domain
- Universal property of localisation: maps that invert $S$ factor uniquely through $S^{-1}R$
- The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution
- A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain
- Degree, leading coefficient and monic polynomial, with the zero polynomial having no degree
- Degree inequalities for sums and products over a commutative ring
- Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with $1 \ne 0$ and no zero divisors
- Subring: a subset containing $1_R$ and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication
- Bézout identity and the Euclidean algorithm for polynomials over a field
- For every field $F$, $F[x]$ is a Euclidean domain with degree as Euclidean function
- Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element
- Left and right Noetherian rings
- Noetherian modules: every submodule is finitely generated
- In a commutative ring, $(S)$ consists of finite sums $\sum r_i s_i$, and $(a)=Ra$
- Every subgroup of $(\mathbb{Z}, +)$ is $\langle n \rangle = n\mathbb{Z}$ for exactly one natural number $n$
- The canonical projection $R\to R/I$ is a surjective ring homomorphism with kernel $I$
- Correspondence theorem: ideals of $R/I$ correspond to ideals of $R$ containing $I$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
69 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Commutative Algebra, Section 10.37, Lemmas 10.37.4, 10.37.6, 10.37.7 and 10.37.8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, version 4.03, Section 6 (standard reference, not scraped)