How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Integrality and integral closure commute with localisation
Statement
Let be a homomorphism of commutative rings, let be multiplicative, and let .
- If is integral over , then is integral over in .
- If is integral over in , then some makes integral over .
If is a domain, , is a field extension of , and is the integral closure of in , then the integral closure of in is exactly .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A ring map , a multiplicative subset , and an element .
An element is integral over a ring exactly when it satisfies a monic polynomial with coefficients in that ring (Integral ring maps and integral extensions).
The integral closure of a domain in a field is the set of elements integral over the domain (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).
Localisation uses fractions with the usual ring laws (The localisation relation is an equivalence relation and fraction arithmetic is well defined).
A fraction is zero in a localisation exactly when some denominator annihilates (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).
Proof
If satisfies with , then the same identity in reads . By [L1], this makes integral over .
Conversely, assume is integral over . Choose a monic relation with and . Let and put . Multiplying the relation by gives with each . Hence [L4] gives some with in . For and , multiplying that equation by yields , a monic equation over . So is integral over .
Now assume is a domain, , is a field extension, and is the integral closure of in . If with and , then is integral over , so step 1.1 makes integral over .
Conversely, let be integral over . Step 1.2 gives with integral over , so [L2] gives . Therefore . Combining this with step 2.1 proves that the integral closure of in is exactly .
Depends on
- Integral ring maps and integral extensions
- Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains
- Multiplicative subsets and the localisation $S^{-1}R$ as equivalence classes of fractions
- The localisation relation is an equivalence relation and fraction arithmetic is well defined
- Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map
Used by
- The element 1/p is integral over Z[1/p] but not over Z Example
- A domain is integrally closed if and only if its prime localisations are, equivalently if and only if its maximal localisations are Theorem
- Comparable primes with the same contraction are equal under an integral map Theorem
- Lying over for integral ring maps Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Exercise (10.31) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Proposition 6.14 (standard reference, not scraped)