Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite relative integral-closure charts for classical quasi-finite morphisms

Statement

Assume AC and let k be algebraically closed. Let f:X→Y be a separated finite-type morphism of classical varieties with finite fibres, allowing reduced reducible or empty varieties. On an affine open U with coordinate ring A, set MU=Γ(f−1U,OX) and CU=Int⁡A(MU), the integral closure of the image of A in MU. Then CU is a finite reduced A-algebra and (CU)a=CD(a) for every a∈A. These finite affine spaces glue canonically to a finite classical variety N→Y, and evaluation gives a canonical map j:X→N over Y.

Moreover for a flat finite-type A-algebra E, the sections of the scheme-theoretic base change of the inverse image are E⊗AMU. This base change is formed by tensoring the affine chart rings and gluing, retaining any nilpotents; it need not be a reduced classical variety. No assertion that j is an open immersion is made here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The field, morphism and affine-chart definitions of the Statement. The original varieties have reduced classical function sheaves. Arbitrary flat base changes use the tensor-product affine sheaves, without reduction.

[F1]

Classical varieties have finite affine covers and are Noetherian with finitely many components. Principal-open sections are localizations (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties, Classical varieties have finite irreducible decompositions, Regular functions on a principal open are the principal localization).

[F2]

Localization is exact and integral closure commutes with localization (Localisation of modules is exact, Integrality and integral closure commute with localisation). Integral elements form a subring and integrality is transitive (Integral elements over a nonzero base ring form a subring, Integral extensions are transitive).

[F3]

For a dominant morphism of irreducible classical varieties, the dimension of a general nonempty fibre equals the transcendence degree of the function-field extension (Fibres have pure expected dimension over a dense open, Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree). A finitely generated algebraic field extension is finite (An extension generated by finitely many algebraic elements is finite).

[F4]

Finite-type algebras over a field are Noetherian (Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring). Noether normalization makes a finite-type domain finite over a polynomial subring. The integral closure of a polynomial ring over a field in any finite extension of its fraction field is finite. Submodules of finite modules over Noetherian rings are finite (Noether normalisation yields module finiteness over a polynomial subring, Polynomial algebras over fields have finite integral closures, Finitely generated modules over a left Noetherian ring are Noetherian). AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

1.1F1F2constructalgebra

Cover f−1U by finitely many affine opens Wi. Cover their pairwise intersections by finitely many affine opens, using [F1]. The sheaf axiom realizes MU as the kernel of the difference map from the finite product of the coordinate rings of Wi to the finite product of the overlap-chart rings. After tensoring by any flat A-algebra E, exactness and commutation with finite products identify that kernel with the sections on the base-changed affine cover. This proves the flat-base-change assertion. In particular MD(a)=(MU)a. By [F2], CD(a)=(CU)a. The identifications are canonical restrictions and preserve multiplication.

1.2F2F3F4algebraconstruct

Let Si be the coordinate ring of Wi and q a minimal prime of Si; set D=Si/q and A0=A/ker⁡(A→D). The corresponding irreducible component maps dominantly onto its image closure, with finite fibres because it is a closed subvariety of Wi. By [F3] its function field L=Frac⁡D is a finite extension of Frac⁡A0: the general fibre is zero-dimensional, so the relative transcendence degree is zero, and both fields are finitely generated. Choose a polynomial subring R⊆A0 for which A0 is module-finite by [F4]. Then L/Frac⁡R is finite. The integral closure B of R in L is finite over R. Every element integral over A0 is integral over R by [F2]; hence the integral closure of A0 in D embeds as an R-submodule of B, and is finite over R by [F4]. Its R-generators are also A0-generators, since it is an A0-module. It is therefore finite over A.

2.1F1F4step 1.1step 1.2algebra

The reduced ring Si injects into the finite product of its minimal-prime domains D. Restricting an element integral over A into each of these domains gives an element of the finite module found in step 1.2. Thus Int⁡A(Si) is a submodule of a finite A-module and is finite by [F4]. The restriction map MU↪∏iSi is injective by the sheaf axiom. Consequently CU is a submodule of the finite product ∏iInt⁡A(Si) and is finite. It is reduced because it is a subring of the ring of actual functions on f−1U. If the inverse image is empty, MU=CU=0 and all assertions hold.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1construct∎

On every principal open of an affine target chart, step 1.1 identifies the finite algebra restrictions. On an overlap of target charts use a finite principal-open refinement; the identifications agree because each comes from restriction of actual functions. They satisfy the cocycle condition and glue their finite affine spaces and sheaves to N. Finiteness is affine local by its defining finite-module charts, so N→Y is finite. On f−1U, every element of CU is a global regular function and evaluation is a regular map to the affine space of that algebra: choose finitely many algebra generators, evaluate them, and note that their defining relations vanish. The maps agree on the same refinements and give j:X→N. Thus neither the charts nor this map depend on the covers chosen in the proof.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

109 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources