Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fibres have pure expected dimension over a dense open

Statement

For a dominant morphism f:X→Y between irreducible classical varieties, there is a nonempty open U⊆Y, contained in f(X), such that every Xy with y∈U is nonempty and has pure dimension r=dim⁡X−dim⁡Y.

Work over a fixed algebraically closed field k, with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.

[F1]

For a dominant morphism f:X→Y between irreducible classical varieties and every closed point y∈Y, each nonempty irreducible component Z of Xy satisfies dim⁡Z≥dim⁡X−dim⁡Y. No bound is asserted for an empty fibre. Work over a fixed algebraically closed field k, with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (Every fibre component has the expected lower bound).

[F2]

Let f:X→Y be dominant between irreducible affine varieties, put A=k[Y]⊆B=k[X], and let r=trdeg⁡k(Y)k(X). There are 0≠a∈A and elements t1,…,tr∈Ba, algebraically independent over Aa, such that Ba is module-finite over Aa[t1,…,tr]. Work over a fixed algebraically closed field k, with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (A dominant affine map factors finitely over relative affine space after shrinking the base).

[F3]

The image of a dominant morphism f:X→Y between irreducible affine varieties contains a nonempty principal open subset of Y. Work over a fixed algebraically closed field k, with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (Dominant affine images contain a principal open).

[F4]

Every classical variety is Noetherian and has finitely many irreducible components. Every open or closed subvariety has a finite affine cover. Work over a fixed algebraically closed field k, with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (Classical varieties have finite irreducible decompositions).

[F5]

For every open cover T=⋃i∈IUi of a Noetherian space, dim⁡T=sup⁡idim⁡Ui, with empty supremum −∞. (Dimension can be computed on an open cover).

[F6]

Let k⊆K⊆L be a tower of field extensions. Assume that trdeg⁡kK and trdeg⁡KL are finite. Then trdeg⁡kL=trdeg⁡kK+trdeg⁡KL. (Transcendence degree is additive in finite towers).

[F7]

Let k be a field, let A be a finite-type k-domain, and let K=Frac⁡(A). Then dim⁡A=trdeg⁡kK. (Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree).

[F8]

If U is a nonempty open of an irreducible classical variety X, then dim⁡U=dim⁡X. Every proper closed subvariety Z⊊X has dim⁡Z<dim⁡X. Work over a fixed algebraically closed field k, with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (Nonempty opens preserve irreducible dimension).

[F9]

If X is an irreducible classical variety, then dim⁡X=trdeg⁡kk(X)<∞. Work over a fixed algebraically closed field k, with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (Dimension equals transcendence degree).

[F10]

For irreducible classical X, the fraction fields of all nonempty affine charts identify canonically; denote the resulting field by k(X). A dominant morphism f:X→Y between irreducible classical varieties induces an injection f∗:k(Y)↪k(X). Dominant means that the image is dense. Work over a fixed algebraically closed field k, with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (Function fields and dominant pullbacks on general varieties).

Proof

1.1F4F6F9F10

Choose a nonempty affine target chart V and cover its inverse image by finitely many nonempty affine charts Wi. Every Wi→V is dominant because nonempty opens in irreducible X intersect the inverse image of every nonempty open in V. The common function fields and transcendence-degree additivity give trdeg⁡k(Y)k(X)=r.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

For each Wi→V, normalization after restriction gives a nonzero ai∈k[V] such that k[Wi]ai is finite over an injected polynomial ring k[V]ai[t1,…,tr]. Intersect these finitely many principal opens and, if needed, the principal image opens supplied by the affine image lemma. The result U is nonempty, since V is irreducible, and lies in the image of every Wi.

3.1F7step 2.1

For y∈U, each affine fibre chart has coordinate ring obtained by quotienting k[Wi]ai by the radical of my. The ring of any irreducible component is therefore a domain finite over the image of k[t1,…,tr]. Its fraction field is algebraic over the fraction field of that image, which is generated by at most r elements. Thus its transcendence degree and its dimension are at most r. This uses a quotient of the polynomial ring, not an unjustified injection after taking a fibre.

4.1F1F5step 2.1step 3.1F8∎

For any global irreducible component Z of Xy, choose a fibre chart meeting it away from the other components. Its intersection is a nonempty open of Z and an affine component, hence has the same dimension as Z and at most r by the preceding calculation. The lower-bound theorem gives dim⁡Z≥r. Hence each component has dimension exactly r; nonemptiness follows from U⊆f(Wi). The zero-relative-dimension case is included.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources