How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dominant affine images contain a principal open
Statement
The image of a dominant morphism between irreducible affine varieties contains a nonempty principal open subset of .
Work over a fixed algebraically closed field , with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
Let be dominant between irreducible affine varieties, put , and let . There are and elements , algebraically independent over , such that is module-finite over . Work over a fixed algebraically closed field , with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (A dominant affine map factors finitely over relative affine space after shrinking the base).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be an integral ring map, and let with . Then there exists a prime ideal such that . (Lying over for integral ring maps).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be an algebraically closed field. 1. The assignments induce mutually inverse inclusion-reversing correspondences between affine algebraic sets and radical ideals . 2. Under this correspondence, nonempty irreducible affine algebraic sets correspond exactly to prime ideals. (Affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible ones to prime ideals).
Proof
Use normalization over an open to obtain with finite over the injected polynomial algebra . The open is nonempty: if vanished at every point it would be zero in the reduced coordinate ring by the Nullstellensatz.
Fix and the maximal ideal , whose quotient is . Lying over gives a prime contracting to . The domain is finite over . Every nonzero element acts injectively on this finite-dimensional vector space, hence surjectively, so the domain is a field. Algebraic closedness forces it to be . Images of the affine coordinates therefore give a classical point of lying over , with nonzero. Thus every such lies in the image, including when .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Milne Theorem 9.1, p.198 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vakil Theorem 12.4.1 proof, pp.354–356 (standard reference, not scraped)