How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible ones to prime ideals
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be an algebraically closed field.
-
The assignments induce mutually inverse inclusion-reversing correspondences between affine algebraic sets and radical ideals .
-
Under this correspondence, nonempty irreducible affine algebraic sets correspond exactly to prime ideals.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An algebraically closed field and the Axiom of Choice.
For every subset and ideal , so in particular and (Vanishing ideals and zero loci form a Galois connection).
For every ideal , (Strong Nullstellensatz: I(V(I)) equals the radical of I).
For ideals one has (Zero loci in affine space are the closed sets of the classical Zariski topology).
Proof
Let be affine algebraic, say for some set . Then by [L1]. The reverse inclusion holds because every element of vanishes on , so and therefore by [L1]. Hence .
Conversely, assume is nonempty and irreducible, and let . Then every point of annihilates , so by [L3]. Irreducibility gives or , and then [L1] yields or . Also because . Therefore is prime.
Let be an ideal. Then [L2] gives . Therefore is radical exactly when . Together with step 1.1, this makes and inverse correspondences between algebraic sets and radical ideals.
Let be a nonempty algebraic set. If is prime and with algebraic subsets and , then [L3] gives . Applying step 1.1 and then [L2], Hence . If neither nor were contained in , we could choose and , and then would contradict primality of . So or , which by [L1] means or . Since , one has or . Thus is irreducible.
Steps 2.2 and 1.2 identify the irreducible algebraic sets precisely with the prime ideals under the correspondence from step 2.1.
Depends on
Used by
- Module-finite affine maps have finite fibres Corollary
- The normalization of an irreducible affine variety is finite Corollary
- A normal singular surface: the quadric cone Counterexample
- The quotient of GL2 by the diagonal torus is the complement of the diagonal in P1 x P1 Example
- Every affine algebraic set has finitely many irreducible components Lemma
- Projective space over a classical base and homogeneous closed loci Lemma
- Smooth orbits are locally closed and their orbit maps are faithfully flat over every field Lemma
- A classical affine variety has a domain as its coordinate ring, and conversely Theorem
- Affine algebraic sets and reduced affine k-algebras at the object level Theorem
- Finite morphisms are closed with finite fibres Theorem
- Tits deformation for the type-A Hecke algebra Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Corollary 2.17 and Summary 2.28 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Donu Arapura, Notes on Basic Algebraic Geometry, §1.5-1.6 (standard reference, not scraped)