Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Zero loci in affine space are the closed sets of the classical Zariski topology

Statement

Let k be an algebraically closed field and fix n0. The subsets V(S)Akn form the closed sets of a topology on Akn. More precisely:

  1. arbitrary intersections of sets of the form V(S) are again of that form;
  2. finite unions of sets of the form V(S) are again of that form;
  3. and Akn are of that form.

For ideals I,Jk[x1,,xn] one has V(I)V(J)=V(IJ).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An algebraically closed field k and an integer n0.

[L1]

For any subsets S,Tk[x1,,xn], the zero locus V(S) is the set of points where every polynomial in S vanishes (An affine algebraic set in affine space).

[L2]

Replacing a set of equations by the ideal it generates does not change the zero locus (A zero locus depends only on the generated ideal and its radical).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If {Sα}αA is any family of subsets of k[x1,,xn], then a point lies in every V(Sα) exactly when it annihilates every polynomial in every Sα, that is, exactly when it lies in V(αASα). Hence αAV(Sα)=V ⁣(αASα).

L1given
1.2

By definition, V()=Akn and V(1)=.

L1given
1.3

Let I,Jk[x1,,xn] be ideals. If aV(I)V(J), then every product fg with fI and gJ vanishes at a, so aV(IJ). Conversely, if aV(IJ) but aV(I) and aV(J), choose fI and gJ with f(a)0 and g(a)0. Then (fg)(a)0, contradicting aV(IJ). Thus V(I)V(J)=V(IJ).

L1algebrachoose
2.1

For arbitrary subsets S,T, step 1.3 and [L2] give V(S)V(T)=V((S))V((T))=V((S)(T)), so finite unions of zero loci are zero loci. Repeating this argument proves the same for any finite union.

L2step 1.3algebra
3.1

Steps 1.1, 1.2, and 2.1 are exactly the topology axioms for the closed subsets of Akn, and step 1.3 gives the displayed formula V(I)V(J)=V(IJ).

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 1.3

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · one level

2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources