How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A zero locus depends only on the generated ideal and its radical
Statement
Let be an algebraically closed field and let . If denotes the ideal generated by , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An algebraically closed field , a natural number , and a set .
For any subset , (An affine algebraic set in affine space).
Proof
Because , every point annihilating certainly annihilates , so . Conversely, if and with , then . Hence . Therefore .
Since , we have . Conversely, if and , choose with . Then , and a field has no nonzero nilpotent elements, so . Thus , proving .
Combining steps 1.1 and 2.1 gives .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · one level
1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Chapter 2c (standard reference, not scraped)
- Donu Arapura, Notes on Basic Algebraic Geometry, Corollary 1.3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)