How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The coordinate cross V(xy) is reducible and its coordinate ring has zero divisors
Example
Let be an algebraically closed field and let By Zero loci in affine space are the closed sets of the classical Zariski topology, so is the union of the two coordinate axes. Each axis is a proper closed subset of , hence is reducible.
If a polynomial vanishes on , then vanishes at every element of the infinite field , so it is the zero polynomial and divides . Likewise, identically, so divides . Since and are coprime, divides . Thus .
Its coordinate ring is The classes and are both nonzero: for instance, does not vanish at and does not vanish at , so neither lies in the ideal . But Thus has zero divisors, exactly as the irreducible-domain criterion predicts.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Example 2.29 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Donu Arapura, Notes on Basic Algebraic Geometry, affine-variety examples (standard reference, not scraped)