How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Affine algebraic sets and reduced affine k-algebras at the object level
Statement
Let be an algebraically closed field.
-
If is an affine algebraic set, then its coordinate ring is a reduced affine -algebra.
-
If is a reduced affine -algebra, then there exist and an affine algebraic set such that as -algebras.
Thus affine algebraic sets correspond to reduced affine -algebras at the object level, with the morphism half deferred to the next page.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An algebraically closed field .
For an affine algebraic set , (The coordinate ring of an affine algebraic set).
A reduced affine -algebra is a reduced commutative -algebra of finite type over (A reduced affine k-algebra).
A commutative -algebra is of finite type exactly when it is isomorphic to a quotient for some and some ideal (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).
Over an algebraically closed field, algebraic sets correspond exactly to radical ideals (Affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible ones to prime ideals).
Proof
Let be an affine algebraic set. By [L1], the ring is a quotient of the polynomial ring , so [L3] shows that is of finite type over .
Let be a reduced affine -algebra. By [L2] and [L3], there exist and an ideal with . Because is reduced, if then the class of in is nilpotent, hence zero; therefore . So is a radical ideal.
To see that is reduced, let satisfy for some . Choosing a representative in the polynomial ring, this means . Since is radical by [L4], we have , so . Thus is reduced. Together with step 1.1 and [L2], this proves part (1).
By [L4], the radical ideal is the vanishing ideal of the algebraic set . Then [L1] gives , so .
Steps 2.1 and 2.2 establish the stated object-level correspondence between affine algebraic sets and reduced affine -algebras.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Proposition 3.25 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Donu Arapura, Notes on Basic Algebraic Geometry, Chapter 1 affine-variety dictionary (standard reference, not scraped)