Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite morphisms are closed with finite fibres

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. A finite morphism f:X→Y of classical varieties over an algebraically closed field is closed, and every fibre f−1(y) is a finite set. The statement holds in every characteristic and needs no flatness, separability, or normality hypothesis.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the algebraically closed field k, the finite morphism f ⁣:X→Y of classical varieties, a finite affine cover Y=U1∪⋯∪Un of principal opens with f−1(Ui) affine and Bi=k[f−1(Ui)] a finite module over Ai=k[Ui], a closed subset Z⊆X, and a point y∈Y.

[F1]

A morphism is finite exactly when some finite affine cover of the target by affine opens has affine finite-module preimages, and then the same holds over every affine open (Finite morphisms of classical varieties, Principal opens form a basis for the Zariski topology on an affine variety, Integral classical varieties in the compatible affine-atlas register).

[F2]

Pullback of functions identifies morphisms of affine varieties with k-algebra homomorphisms, and a finite algebra is integral (Affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms, Affine algebraic sets and reduced affine k-algebras at the object level).

[F3]

Lying over: for an integral ring map A→B and a prime p with ker⁡⊆p there is a prime q⊆B with q∩A=p (Lying over for integral ring maps, Going up for integral ring maps). AC is used here.

[F4]

If A⊆B is an integral extension and q⊆B is prime with contraction q∩A, then q is maximal exactly when q∩A is (Under an integral extension, a prime is maximal if and only if its contraction is maximal).

[F5]

For an affine algebraic set X the closed subsets correspond bijectively to radical ideals of k[X] by Z↦I(Z), J↦V(J), and the points correspond to maximal ideals (Affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible ones to prime ideals, Points of an affine algebraic set correspond to maximal ideals of its coordinate ring). AC is inherited from the Nullstellensatz route.

[F6]

A module-finite morphism of affine classical algebraic sets is quasi-finite, that is, every closed-point fibre is a finite set (Module-finite affine maps have finite fibres, Module-finite affine maps for the quasi-finite comparison, Quasi-finite classical morphisms).

Proof

1.1F3F4F5algebragiven

First the affine case: let Y have coordinate ring A=k[Y], let X have coordinate ring B=k[X], let A→B be the pullback of f, and assume B is a finite A-module; let Z⊆X be closed with radical ideal J=I(Z)⊆B. Then f(Z)=V(J∩A), which is closed. Indeed, if z∈Z and g∈J∩A, then f∗(g)=g∘f∈J vanishes at z, so g(f(z))=0, giving f(Z)⊆V(J∩A). Conversely let y∈V(J∩A) and let m=my⊆A be the corresponding maximal ideal, which contains J∩A. The induced map A/(J∩A)→B/J is integral, because a monic integrality equation for b∈B over A reduces modulo J∩A to a monic equation for the class of b; and mˉ=m/(J∩A) is maximal. By lying over [F3] there is a prime qˉ⊆B/J contracting to mˉ, and qˉ is maximal by [F4]; it is the image of a maximal ideal q⊆B containing J. By [F5] the maximal ideal q is mz for a point z∈X, and J⊆q with Z=V(J) gives z∈Z. Finally q∩A=m, since both ideals contain J∩A and have the same image in A/(J∩A); as contraction along the pullback is precomposition, q∩A={g∈A:g∘f∈mz}={g∈A:g(f(z))=0}=mf(z). Hence mf(z)=my, so f(z)=y by the bijectivity in [F5], and y∈f(Z).

1.2F1F2F6given

Finite fibres: let y∈Y and choose an index i with y∈Ui; then f−1(y)⊆f−1(Ui), and the restriction fi ⁣:f−1(Ui)→Ui is a module-finite morphism of affine classical algebraic sets, because Bi is a finite Ai-module by the choice of the cover [F1, F2]. By [F6] the map fi is quasi-finite, so its fibre fi−1(y)=f−1(y) is a finite set.

2.1F1step 1.1given

Now the general closedness statement. Let Z⊆X be closed. A subset of Y is closed exactly when its traces in the members of the open cover U1,…,Un are closed, and f(Z)∩Ui=fi(Z∩f−1(Ui)), where Z∩f−1(Ui) is closed in the affine variety f−1(Ui). By step 1.1 applied to the affine map fi, each f(Z)∩Ui is closed in Ui. Hence f(Z) is closed in Y, so f is closed.

3.1F1step 1.2step 2.1∎

Combining the two halves: every closed subset of X has closed image by step 2.1, and every fibre of f is finite by step 1.2. No characteristic, flatness, separability, or normality hypothesis entered either argument, and the only choice principle used is the Axiom of Choice through [F3] and [F5].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources