How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite morphisms are closed with finite fibres
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. A finite morphism of classical varieties over an algebraically closed field is closed, and every fibre is a finite set. The statement holds in every characteristic and needs no flatness, separability, or normality hypothesis.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the algebraically closed field , the finite morphism of classical varieties, a finite affine cover of principal opens with affine and a finite module over , a closed subset , and a point .
A morphism is finite exactly when some finite affine cover of the target by affine opens has affine finite-module preimages, and then the same holds over every affine open (Finite morphisms of classical varieties, Principal opens form a basis for the Zariski topology on an affine variety, Integral classical varieties in the compatible affine-atlas register).
Pullback of functions identifies morphisms of affine varieties with -algebra homomorphisms, and a finite algebra is integral (Affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms, Affine algebraic sets and reduced affine k-algebras at the object level).
Lying over: for an integral ring map and a prime with there is a prime with (Lying over for integral ring maps, Going up for integral ring maps). AC is used here.
If is an integral extension and is prime with contraction , then is maximal exactly when is (Under an integral extension, a prime is maximal if and only if its contraction is maximal).
For an affine algebraic set the closed subsets correspond bijectively to radical ideals of by , , and the points correspond to maximal ideals (Affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible ones to prime ideals, Points of an affine algebraic set correspond to maximal ideals of its coordinate ring). AC is inherited from the Nullstellensatz route.
A module-finite morphism of affine classical algebraic sets is quasi-finite, that is, every closed-point fibre is a finite set (Module-finite affine maps have finite fibres, Module-finite affine maps for the quasi-finite comparison, Quasi-finite classical morphisms).
Proof
First the affine case: let have coordinate ring , let have coordinate ring , let be the pullback of , and assume is a finite -module; let be closed with radical ideal . Then , which is closed. Indeed, if and , then vanishes at , so , giving . Conversely let and let be the corresponding maximal ideal, which contains . The induced map is integral, because a monic integrality equation for over reduces modulo to a monic equation for the class of ; and is maximal. By lying over [F3] there is a prime contracting to , and is maximal by [F4]; it is the image of a maximal ideal containing . By [F5] the maximal ideal is for a point , and with gives . Finally , since both ideals contain and have the same image in ; as contraction along the pullback is precomposition, . Hence , so by the bijectivity in [F5], and .
Finite fibres: let and choose an index with ; then , and the restriction is a module-finite morphism of affine classical algebraic sets, because is a finite -module by the choice of the cover [F1, F2]. By [F6] the map is quasi-finite, so its fibre is a finite set.
Now the general closedness statement. Let be closed. A subset of is closed exactly when its traces in the members of the open cover are closed, and , where is closed in the affine variety . By step 1.1 applied to the affine map , each is closed in . Hence is closed in , so is closed.
Combining the two halves: every closed subset of has closed image by step 2.1, and every fibre of is finite by step 1.2. No characteristic, flatness, separability, or normality hypothesis entered either argument, and the only choice principle used is the Axiom of Choice through [F3] and [F5].
Depends on
- Finite morphisms of classical varieties
- Going up for integral ring maps
- Lying over for integral ring maps
- Affine algebraic sets and reduced affine k-algebras at the object level
- Points of an affine algebraic set correspond to maximal ideals of its coordinate ring
- Principal opens form a basis for the Zariski topology on an affine variety
- Integral classical varieties in the compatible affine-atlas register
- Left and right Artinian rings
- An Artinian ring has only finitely many maximal ideals
- Affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms
- The Axiom of Choice
- Affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible ones to prime ideals
- Under an integral extension, a prime is maximal if and only if its contraction is maximal
- Module-finite affine maps have finite fibres
- Module-finite affine maps for the quasi-finite comparison
- Quasi-finite classical morphisms
Used by
- Finite fibres and an open immersion do not make a map finite Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry (2025 version), Ch. 8 §c: Theorem 8.24, Proposition 8.28 and Lemma 8.29 (standard reference, not scraped)