Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite morphisms of classical varieties

Definition

Let k be an algebraically closed field and let f ⁣:X→Y be a morphism of classical varieties over k in the reduced, separated, finite-type register of Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties, allowing reducible and empty varieties. Here an affine open means an open subspace isomorphic to a reduced affine algebraic set with its regular-function sheaf; it need not be irreducible or be one particular principal open. In the irreducible case this agrees with Integral classical varieties in the compatible affine-atlas register and Morphisms of classical affine varieties. The empty affine model has the zero coordinate ring and is allowed as an inverse image.

An affine open subset U⊆Y is finite for f when f−1(U) is affine and the pullback homomorphism of regular functions k[U]→k[f−1(U)] presents the coordinate ring k[f−1(U)] as a finite k[U]-module (Affine open subsets of a classical affine variety, A classical affine variety, Affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms, Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras, Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module).

The morphism f is finite when Y admits a finite cover by affine open subsets U1,…,Un that are finite for f.

Affine-locality, recorded with the definition. The condition does not depend on the chosen cover: if some finite affine cover consists of subsets finite for f, then every affine open subset U⊆Y is finite for f. On an affine target Spm⁡(A) this is the affine-communication computation of Milne's Lemma 8.19: if B is a k-algebra and the localisations Ba1,…,Ban are finite modules over Aa1,…,Aan for elements a1,…,an generating the unit ideal, then finitely many of those local generators, cleared of denominators, generate B as an A-module. The passage to an arbitrary affine open of a general Y is Milne's Proposition 8.21, whose proof embeds Γ(f−1(U),OX) into a product of finitely many affine coordinate rings and compares the canonical morphism with Spm⁡Γ(f−1(U),OX) over the members of the cover. Consequently finiteness is affine-local on the target: it may be tested on the members of any one finite affine cover of Y by affine opens.

Restriction. Finiteness is preserved by restriction to open subvarieties of the target: if f ⁣:X→Y is finite and V⊆Y is open, then the restriction f−1(V)→V is finite, because an affine open subset of V is an affine open subset of Y.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources