Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Zariski's Main Theorem: open immersion followed by a finite morphism

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let f ⁣:X→Y be a separated morphism of finite type with finite fibres (quasi-finite in the classical sense) between classical varieties over an algebraically closed field. Then f factors as f=ν∘j with j ⁣:X↪N an open immersion and ν ⁣:N→Y finite. This is the exact classical form of Zariski's Main Theorem used by the later items of this page.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the algebraically closed field k, and the separated finite-type quasi-finite morphism f ⁣:X→Y of classical varieties.

[F1]

In the classical register, a morphism has finite fibres exactly when it is quasi-finite: every closed-point fibre Xy is a finite set, empty fibres allowed (Quasi-finite classical morphisms, Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties).

[F2]

The local classical Zariski Main bridge: for a separated finite-type morphism with finite fibres between classical varieties, allowing reduced reducible or empty varieties, the relative integral closures of the affine charts glue to a finite classical morphism ν ⁣:N→Y, and the evaluation maps glue to an open immersion j ⁣:X↪N with f=ν∘j (Classical Zariski Main from relative integral-closure neighbourhoods). AC is consumed there through the algebraic Zariski Main localisation and the standard-smooth suppliers.

[F3]

The conclusion ν is finite in the sense of the page's affine-local finite-morphism definition (Finite morphisms of classical varieties).

Proof

1.1F1F2given

The morphism f of the statement is separated of finite type with finite fibres, so it is quasi-finite in the sense of [F1]; its source and target are classical varieties in the register of [F1] and [F2], with a finite affine atlas making them quasi-compact, and separatedness giving quasi-separatedness. These are exactly the hypotheses of the bridge [F2], which allows reduced reducible or empty varieties and assumes no quasi-projectivity, normality, separability, or smoothness.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1∎

Applying [F2], the relative integral closures CU of the affine coordinate rings glue to a finite classical morphism ν ⁣:N→Y, and the evaluation maps glue to an open immersion j ⁣:X↪N satisfying f=ν∘j. By [F3] the map ν is finite in the page's sense, and j is an open immersion, so f=ν∘j is the asserted factorization. This is the exact classical form of Zariski's Main Theorem used below: an open immersion followed by a finite morphism.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources