Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Classical Zariski Main from relative integral-closure neighbourhoods

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and let k be algebraically closed. Let f:X→Y be a separated morphism of finite type with finite fibres between classical varieties, allowing reduced reducible or empty varieties. On each affine U⊆Y, take the integral closure CU of k[U] in Γ(f−1U,OX). The finite affine spaces of these algebras glue to a finite classical morphism ν:N→Y, and their evaluation maps glue to an open immersion j:X↪N with f=ν∘j.

Thus every separated quasi-finite classical morphism factors as an open immersion followed by a finite morphism. Its finite affine atlas makes both source and target quasi-compact; separatedness gives quasi-separatedness. No quasi-projectivity, normality, separability, or smoothness assumption is added. This item proves the classical finite-type case; it makes no assertion for arbitrary non-Noetherian schemes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, k and the morphism of the Statement, with its full separated finite-type finite-fibre hypotheses.

[F1]

The relative-integral-closure charts are finite and reduced, glue canonically to N, and give the evaluation map j. Sections commute with flat base change by the finite-affine-cover equalizer proof (Finite relative integral-closure charts for classical quasi-finite morphisms).

[F2]

Elementary etale changes are open and flat, stable under base change and composition, preserve reducedness, and induce faithfully flat local ring maps at selected points (Local algebra tools for elementary etale changes of classical varieties). Their residue fields at classical points are k.

[F3]

Relative integral closure commutes with these changes (Relative integral closure under elementary etale change).

[F4]

After an elementary etale change at a chosen fibre point, the changed source decomposes into a finite clopen piece containing just that selected fibre point, and its clopen complement (Finite fibre components after an elementary etale change).

[F5]

A faithfully flat tensor functor detects zero modules, and a faithfully flat ring map is surjective on prime spectra (A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when it detects proper ideals and is surjective on spectra). Classical varieties are separated prevarieties with finite affine atlases (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties). AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4constructalgebra

Construct N and j by [F1]; their composite is f, since evaluation on the image of a base function is its pullback by f. Fix x∈X and y=f(x). By [F4], after a chosen elementary change (T,t)→(Y,y) the source decomposes as XT=V⊔W, where V→T is finite and Vt consists of the selected lift of x. Work on an affine neighbourhood of t if necessary. Flat base change of sections in [F1] and integral-closure compatibility [F3] identify the relative normalization of T in XT with NT=N×YT. The section algebra of the disjoint union is a product, and relative integral closure in a product is the product of the closures: one inclusion follows by projection of monic equations, and for the other multiply finitely many monic equations annihilating the two components. Since the algebra of V is finite, it is already integral over the base. Therefore NT=V⊔NW, with jT∣V the identity and jT(W)⊆NW. In particular jT−1(V)=V and this restriction is an isomorphism.

2.1F1F2step 1.1construct

The projection NT→N is an elementary change by [F2], hence open. Let H be the image of the open piece V⊆NT; it is an open neighbourhood of j(x). The map p:V→H is surjective and locally flat, and the square with vertical maps j and jT identifies XH×HV with V, by step 1.1. We prove below that this forces XH→H to be an isomorphism, using only affine algebra and the sheaf of regular functions. This is the nonaffine descent step; no chartwise factorization is assumed to glue by itself.

3.1F2F5step 2.1constructalgebra

Fix a classical point h∈H and a classical point v∈V above it. Put A=OH,h and B=OV,v. The local map A→B is faithfully flat by [F2]. Restricting the square of step 2.1 to these local affine models gives XA×ASpec⁡B≅Spec⁡B. Here XA is obtained by localizing the finite affine source cover at the base denominators; its charts and overlaps are ordinary localized rings. Its closed fibre has exactly one point: the local elementary-change fibre B/mAB is the selected zero-dimensional regular fibre factor, hence equals k by [F2]. Reducing the displayed isomorphism by mA therefore identifies that fibre with Spec⁡k. Choose an affine open Q⊆XA containing this point. The pullback QB is open in Spec⁡B and contains its closed point. Every open neighbourhood of the closed point of a local spectrum is the entire spectrum, so QB=Spec⁡B.

4.1F2F5step 3.1algebra

Write Q=Spec⁡D. The isomorphism of step 3.1 says D⊗AB=B by the natural algebra map. Flatness and [F5] annihilate the kernel and cokernel of A→D, so A→D is an isomorphism. The complement XA∖Q has empty pullback to B. If it contained a point with prime q in an affine source chart, faithful flatness after tensoring with the residue field at q would give a point above it; equivalently use the surjectivity on spectra in [F5] for that chart base change. Thus the complement is empty and XA≅Spec⁡A. In particular j has exactly one point over h and an isomorphism of its local rings there. This proves these assertions for every classical point of H.

5.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1construct

The map j is open onto its image. For an open O⊆X and a point x∈O, use the construction of step 1.1. The open subset OT∩V of NT projects to an open subset of N containing j(x), by [F2]. Every point of this projection is the image under j of a point of O, because jT is the identity on V and the square is Cartesian. Conversely every j(x) with x∈O belongs to one of these projections. Their union is therefore j(O), which is open. The descent argument of steps 3.1–4.1 shows that over every H of step 2.1 the map is bijective and induces isomorphisms on local rings. These H cover j(X), so j is a homeomorphism onto the open subset j(X) with an isomorphism of sheaves: a sheaf morphism whose stalk maps are isomorphisms is an isomorphism, as local inverses agree on overlaps. Thus j is an open immersion. Since ν is finite by [F1], the required factorization follows.

6.1F1F2F3F4F5step 5.1∎

If X is empty, the section algebra and its integral closure are zero on every chart, so N is empty and the factorization is immediate. Reducible cases were retained in [F1]; after elementary change they remain reduced by [F2]. The finite-type and finite-fibre hypotheses were used in [F1] and [F4], and separatedness was used to make the finite neighbourhood closed in [F4]. AC is inherited from the algebraic localization, flat prime-lifting and standard-smooth suppliers. Perfectness is not needed for this factorization; it remains necessary in the separate regular-to-smooth curve consequence. No later scheme theorem is used as a premise.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources