How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Proper quasi-finite classical morphisms are finite
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and let be algebraically closed. A proper quasi-finite morphism of classical varieties is finite. Here proper means separated, of finite type, and universally closed; quasi-finite means of finite type with finite fibres. This assertion uses the full separated quasi-finite factorization, not merely its affine-source case. In particular a classical projective morphism with finite fibres is finite.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and the proper quasi-finite morphism of the Statement.
The separated quasi-finite classical Zariski Main theorem gives with an open immersion and finite (Classical Zariski Main from relative integral-closure neighbourhoods).
Classical varieties are separated prevarieties with finite affine atlases (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties). AC is the choice-function axiom (The Axiom of Choice).
Projection from to any classical variety is closed (Projection from projective space over a variety is closed).
Proof
Apply [F1], retaining separatedness and finite type from the properness assumption. The finite map is separated: over , write its inverse image as , where is a finite -algebra; its relative diagonal is closed because the multiplication map is surjective. Thus the graph of is closed in , as it is the inverse image of this diagonal under .
The projection is a base change of the universally closed map , so the image of the graph is closed in . This image is . It is open by [F1], hence open and closed. The open immersion identifies with this subvariety; its inclusion is also a closed immersion. On any affine open of , with finite over . The open-and-closed subset is affine: its characteristic function is locally the regular constants and , which glue to an idempotent ; the subset is and has coordinate ring . This is a quotient of a finite -module, hence finite over . Therefore is finite on every affine target open, which proves the assertion.
For the stated projective case, write the morphism as a closed subvariety of followed by projection. After any classical base change this remains a closed subvariety of , so [F3] makes its projection closed. The morphism is separated (its relative diagonal is given by the projective cross-product equations) and of finite type (its finite standard affine charts have finite-type coordinate rings). With finite fibres it therefore satisfies all the proper quasi-finite hypotheses of steps 1.1–2.1 and is finite. This proves Chevalley's projective finite-fibre case without assuming algebraic closure of the image model or an affine source.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Proposition 8.54 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 37.44.1 (standard reference, not scraped)