How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Regular varieties are normal
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. At every regular point of a classical variety over an algebraically closed field the local ring is an integrally closed domain; hence every regular variety is normal. No characteristic or perfectness hypothesis is needed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the algebraically closed field , the classical variety , a regular point .
A point of a classical variety is regular exactly when its local ring is a regular local ring; on an affine chart this local ring is the localisation of the coordinate ring at the maximal ideal of (Regular points of locally Noetherian schemes, The local ring at a point of an affine variety is the localization at its maximal ideal).
Every regular local ring is an integrally closed domain (regular local rings are normal). AC is used there.
is a normal point exactly when is an integrally closed domain, and is normal exactly when all of its points are normal (Normal points and normal varieties).
Proof
Let be a regular point of . By [F1] the local ring is a regular local ring, and by [F2] it is an integrally closed domain. By [F3] the point is therefore normal.
Since was an arbitrary regular point and [F3] decides normality pointwise, every regular point of is normal; hence a variety all of whose points are regular is normal, that is, every regular variety is normal. Neither [F1] nor [F2] used any hypothesis on the characteristic of or its perfectness, so the conclusion carries no such hypothesis.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.