How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The normalization of an irreducible affine variety
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be an algebraically closed field and let be an irreducible affine variety over with coordinate ring and function field (A classical affine variety, The function field of an irreducible classical affine variety).
Let be the integral closure of in (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains). Then is a finite -module by A finite-type domain over a field has finite normalization and is an integrally closed domain by The integral closure of a domain in a field extension is integrally closed.
Concretely, is a reduced affine -algebra: it is a domain, it is finitely generated as a -algebra because it is a finite module over the finitely generated -algebra , and it is reduced because it is a domain. By the object-level duality of Affine algebraic sets and reduced affine k-algebras at the object level there is an affine algebraic set with ; since is a domain, is irreducible, hence a classical affine variety (A classical affine variety).
The normalization of is the pair , where is the morphism corresponding under the coordinate-ring anti-equivalence (Affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms, Morphisms of classical affine varieties) to the inclusion of -algebras ; the inclusion presents as a finite -module, so is a finite morphism (Finite morphisms of classical varieties). All points of are normal: for the local ring is a localisation of at a maximal ideal, and is an integrally closed domain, so every such localisation is an integrally closed domain as well; hence is a normal variety (Normal points and normal varieties).
Recorded property. The universal property of the normalization, and with it the fact that the pair is unique up to a unique isomorphism over , is proved later on this page. The construction above is the affine case of the normalization of a variety in a finite extension of its function field; finiteness and birationality of are properties of this construction, not additional data.
Depends on
- Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains
- A finite-type domain over a field has finite normalization
- The integral closure of a domain in a field extension is integrally closed
- Affine algebraic sets and reduced affine k-algebras at the object level
- A classical affine variety
- Affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms
- Morphisms of classical affine varieties
- The function field of an irreducible classical affine variety
- Normal points and normal varieties
- The Axiom of Choice
- Finite morphisms of classical varieties
Used by
- The normalization is unique up to unique isomorphism Corollary
- Normalization of the node is two-to-one over the node Counterexample
- The conductor of a normalization Definition
- Unibranch points of a classical variety Definition
- Normalizing the cuspidal plane curve Example
- Normalizing the nodal plane curve Example
- Normalization commutes with restriction to an open subvariety Lemma
- The conductor is an ideal of both rings Lemma
- The normalization is an isomorphism over the normal locus Lemma
- Normalization need not resolve singularities in dimension at least two Remark
- Normalization is finite, surjective and birational Theorem
- Normalization of a classical variety by gluing affine normalizations Theorem
- Universal property of the normalization Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry (2025 version), Ch. 8 §a-b: Definitions 8.1, 8.5 and Proposition 8.3, Example 8.18 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 29.55 Normalization: Definition 29.55.1 and Lemmas 29.55.2-29.55.3 (standard reference, not scraped)