How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Normalization is finite, surjective and birational
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be an irreducible affine variety over an algebraically closed field and its normalization. Then is finite, surjective, and birational: it induces an isomorphism of function fields over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the algebraically closed field , the irreducible affine variety with coordinate ring and function field , the integral closure of in , the normalization with and the morphism whose pullback is the inclusion .
The normalization is finite and birational: is a finite morphism, and its pullback is an isomorphism of -extensions (The normalization of an irreducible affine variety, The normalization of an irreducible affine variety is finite, Irreducible affine varieties are birational exactly when their function fields are isomorphic, Birational maps and birational equivalence of classical affine varieties).
Lying over: if is integral and is prime with , there is a prime contracting to ; moreover a prime of is maximal exactly when its contraction to is (Lying over for integral ring maps, Under an integral extension, a prime is maximal if and only if its contraction is maximal). AC is used here.
Points of the affine varieties and correspond bijectively to maximal ideals of and , and pullback of functions is the ring map induced by , so the maximal ideal of is the contraction of the maximal ideal of (Points of an affine algebraic set correspond to maximal ideals of its coordinate ring, The normalization of an irreducible affine variety).
Dominant morphisms pull back function fields, which is how the function-field isomorphism of [F1] is read as birationality of (Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially, Dominant morphisms and dominant rational maps); normality of is recorded in The normalization of an irreducible affine variety and Normality is checked on affine open charts.
Proof
By the construction of the normalization, is a finite -module, so is finite; and has fraction field , so the pullback is an isomorphism of function fields. Thus is finite and birational [F1, F4].
Surjectivity. Let with maximal ideal . Since is a finite -module the inclusion is integral, and its kernel is zero because is a domain; lying over [F2] therefore produces a prime with , and is maximal by the maximality transfer [F2]. By [F3] there is a point with , and the contraction of along is the maximal ideal of ; since that contraction is , the points and have the same maximal ideal, hence . So lies in the image of .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 give all three assertions: is finite and birational, and every point of lies in the image of , so is surjective. The induced map is the isomorphism of [F1], which completes the proof.
Depends on
- The normalization of an irreducible affine variety
- The normalization of an irreducible affine variety is finite
- Lying over for integral ring maps
- Irreducible affine varieties are birational exactly when their function fields are isomorphic
- Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially
- Dominant morphisms and dominant rational maps
- Birational maps and birational equivalence of classical affine varieties
- Normality is checked on affine open charts
- The Axiom of Choice
- Under an integral extension, a prime is maximal if and only if its contraction is maximal
- Points of an affine algebraic set correspond to maximal ideals of its coordinate ring
Used by
- Normalization of the node is two-to-one over the node Counterexample
- Unibranch points of a classical variety Definition
- Normalizing the cuspidal plane curve Example
- Normalizing the nodal plane curve Example
- The conductor is an ideal of both rings Lemma
- Normalization of a classical variety by gluing affine normalizations Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.