Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalization is finite, surjective and birational

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let X be an irreducible affine variety over an algebraically closed field and ν ⁣:Xν→X its normalization. Then ν is finite, surjective, and birational: it induces an isomorphism k(X)→∼k(Xν) of function fields over k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the algebraically closed field k, the irreducible affine variety X with coordinate ring A=k[X] and function field k(X), the integral closure B of A in k(X), the normalization Xν with k[Xν]=B and the morphism ν whose pullback is the inclusion A↪B.

[F2]

Lying over: if A→B is integral and p⊆A is prime with ker⁡⊆p, there is a prime q⊆B contracting to p; moreover a prime of B is maximal exactly when its contraction to A is (Lying over for integral ring maps, Under an integral extension, a prime is maximal if and only if its contraction is maximal). AC is used here.

[F3]

Points of the affine varieties X and Xν correspond bijectively to maximal ideals of A and B, and pullback of functions is the ring map induced by ν, so the maximal ideal of ν(y) is the contraction of the maximal ideal of y (Points of an affine algebraic set correspond to maximal ideals of its coordinate ring, The normalization of an irreducible affine variety).

[F4]

Dominant morphisms pull back function fields, which is how the function-field isomorphism of [F1] is read as birationality of ν (Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially, Dominant morphisms and dominant rational maps); normality of Xν is recorded in The normalization of an irreducible affine variety and Normality is checked on affine open charts.

Proof

1.1F1F4given

By the construction of the normalization, B is a finite A-module, so ν is finite; and k[Xν]=B has fraction field k(Xν)=Frac⁡(B)=Frac⁡(A)=k(X), so the pullback ν∗ is an isomorphism of function fields. Thus ν is finite and birational [F1, F4].

1.2F1F2F3given

Surjectivity. Let x∈X with maximal ideal mx⊆A. Since B is a finite A-module the inclusion A↪B is integral, and its kernel is zero because A is a domain; lying over [F2] therefore produces a prime q⊆B with q∩A=mx, and q is maximal by the maximality transfer [F2]. By [F3] there is a point y∈Xν with q=my, and the contraction of my along ν∗ is the maximal ideal of ν(y); since that contraction is mx, the points ν(y) and x have the same maximal ideal, hence ν(y)=x. So x lies in the image of ν.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2∎

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 give all three assertions: ν is finite and birational, and every point of X lies in the image of ν, so ν is surjective. The induced map k(X)→k(Xν) is the isomorphism of [F1], which completes the proof.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources