Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalizing the cuspidal plane curve

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let X=V(y2−x3)⊆A2 over an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two. The normalization of X is A1→X, t↦(t2,t3), with coordinate ring inclusion k[x,y]/(y2−x3)≅k[t2,t3]↪k[t]. The map is finite, birational and bijective, the cusp is the unique non-normal point, its fibre is a single point, and the conductor of the extension is the maximal ideal (t2,t3) of k[t2,t3].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an algebraically closed field k with char⁡k≠2, the polynomial P=y2−x3, the cusp X=V(P)⊆A2 with coordinate ring A=k[x,y]/(P), the substitution σ(x)=t2, σ(y)=t3, and the induced map φ ⁣:A→k[t].

[F1]

A ring homomorphism whose kernel contains an ideal factors uniquely through the quotient, so σ induces a unique k-algebra homomorphism φ ⁣:A→k[t] once it kills P (A ring homomorphism whose kernel contains a two-sided ideal factors uniquely through the quotient ring, The quotient ring R/I with (r+I)(s+I)=rs+I, Evaluation and roots of a polynomial in a commutative target ring).

[F2]

Division by the monic polynomial y2−x3∈(k[x])[y] gives every class in A a unique representative a(x)+b(x)y; over a field the polynomial ring is a domain, and a product of nonzero polynomials has the product of leading coefficients as leading coefficient (Division by a monic polynomial over a commutative ring, Degree, leading coefficient and monic polynomial, with the zero polynomial having no degree, A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain, Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with 1≠0 and no zero divisors).

[F4]

The normalization of the affine curve is the affine variety with coordinate ring the integral closure of A in its fraction field, with structure morphism induced by the inclusion; it is finite, surjective and birational, and the affine line is normal (The normalization of an irreducible affine variety, Normalization is finite, surjective and birational, A finite-type domain over a field has finite normalization, Affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms, Normalization of a classical variety by gluing affine normalizations, Affine space is normal).

[F5]

The conductor over the chart is c=Ann⁡A(k[t]/A)={a∈A:a k[t]⊆A}; it is an ideal of both A and k[t], and the support of A/c is the non-normal locus, i.e. the set of points at which the normalization is not an isomorphism (The conductor of a normalization, The conductor is an ideal of both rings).

[F6]

A point is unibranch when its normalization fibre is a single point, and every normal point is unibranch (Unibranch points of a classical variety).

[F7]

AC is inherited through the classical localization, normalization, or finite-morphism suppliers cited above (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

1.1F1givenF7

The substitution kills P: σ(y)2−σ(x)3=t6−t6=0, so by [F1] there is a unique k-algebra homomorphism φ ⁣:A→k[t] with φ(xˉ)=t2 and φ(yˉ)=t3.

2.1F2step 1.1

The map φ is injective. By [F2] every element of A is uniquely a(x)+b(x)y with a,b∈k[x], and φ(a+by)=a(t2)+t3b(t2) separates into an even part a(t2) and an odd part t3b(t2), so φ(a+by)=0 forces both to vanish. If c∈k[x] is nonzero then c(t2)≠0, because the term of highest degree 2deg⁡c has coefficient equal to the leading coefficient of c; hence a=0, and then t3b(t2)=0 with k[t] a domain gives b(t2)=0, hence b=0. So A is a domain isomorphic to k[t2,t3]. If a polynomial Q(x,y) vanishes on X, its substitution vanishes at every t∈k under the displayed parametrization. The field k is infinite, so this substituted polynomial is zero. The kernel just computed is (P), hence I(X)=(P), justifying the coordinate-ring identification in the Given.

3.1F2F3step 2.1

In Frac⁡(A) one has yˉ/xˉ=t3/t2=t, so k(t)⊆Frac⁡(A) and, since A⊆k[t], equality Frac⁡(A)=k(t) holds. Moreover t2=xˉ∈A, so t is integral over A, and every even power of t belongs to A as a power of t2, and every odd power belongs to At; hence k[t]=A+At is a finite A-module.

4.1F3F4step 3.1

If z∈k(t)=Frac⁡(A) is integral over A, then a monic equation for z over A has coefficients in k[t], so z is integral over k[t] and therefore lies in k[t] because k[t] is integrally closed [F3]; conversely every element of k[t]=A+At is integral over A. Hence the integral closure of A in its fraction field is exactly k[t]. By [F4] the normalization of the cusp is ν ⁣:A1→X induced by A↪k[t], namely ν(t)=(t2,t3), a finite birational map.

5.1F2step 4.1

The map ν is bijective. If u=0 for a point (u,v) of the cusp, then v2=u3=0, so v=0 and the unique parameter is t=0; if u≠0, then t=v/u satisfies t2=v2/u2=u3/u2=u and t3=v⋅v2/u3=v, so (u,v) is the image of the unique parameter v/u. Hence every point of X has exactly one preimage.

6.1F4F6step 5.1

The pullback φ ⁣:k[t2,t3]↪k[t] is not surjective: its image consists of sums of monomials tn with n∈⟨2,3⟩={0,2,3,4,… }, and t has exponent 1, so t is not in the image. By the anti-equivalence [F4] the map ν is not an isomorphism, although it is bijective. Its fibre over the cusp is the singleton {0}, because t2=0 forces t=0 in the field k; hence the cusp is unibranch [F6].

7.1F5step 6.1

The conductor is the maximal ideal m=(t2,t3) of A: indeed t2 k[t]⊆A and t3 k[t]⊆A because every exponent ≥2 lies in ⟨2,3⟩, so m⊆c; conversely an a∈A outside m has nonzero constant coefficient c. All its other monomials have exponent at least two, so at has a nonzero coefficient c at exponent one and cannot belong to A, so c⊆m. By [F5] V(c) is the non-normal locus, and V(t2,t3) is the single point (0,0); hence the cusp is the unique non-normal point of X.

8.1F4F5F6step 7.1∎

Summing up: the normalization of the cusp is ν ⁣:A1→X, t↦(t2,t3), a finite birational bijection which is not an isomorphism; the cusp is its unique non-normal point, with singleton fibre {0}, so it is unibranch but not normal; and the conductor of the extension is the maximal ideal (t2,t3) of k[t2,t3].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

107 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources