How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The cusp conductor and its two semigroup-ring generators
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For the cusp , the conductor is the ideal of : the least exponent such that for every is , and does not generate the conductor alone since is not a multiple of inside the semigroup ring.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two, the semigroup ring , its maximal ideal , and the conductor .
The conductor of the normalization of the cusp is , an ideal of both and , and the normalization of the cusp is with conductor (The conductor of a normalization, The conductor is an ideal of both rings, Normalizing the cuspidal plane curve).
The normalization of the cusp realizes the extension as , with a finite -module and fraction field , and its conductor is the maximal ideal (Normalizing the cuspidal plane curve).
AC is inherited through the classical localization, normalization, or finite-morphism suppliers cited above (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
: for the monomial has exponent at least , and every exponent lies in the numerical semigroup generated by and , so ; the same argument gives . Hence , and since is an ideal, .
The semigroup contains every integer and misses , so the least exponent with for all is . The element is not a multiple of inside : an equation with would force since is a domain. Hence alone does not generate the conductor, and the two monomials are both needed.
Conversely let satisfy . If , it has a nonzero constant coefficient and all remaining terms have exponent at least two. Thus has nonzero coefficient at exponent one, so , a contradiction; lies in . Hence and ; with step 1.1, .
Therefore the conductor of the cusp extension is the maximal ideal of the semigroup ring, whose generators are the first two positive elements of the semigroup: the least exponent from which all monomials lie in is , and neither generator alone suffices.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry (2025 version), Ch. 8 Example 8.6(a): the cusp semigroup and its conductor (standard reference, not scraped)