Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The cusp conductor and its two semigroup-ring generators

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For the cusp k[t2,t3]⊆k[t], the conductor is the ideal (t2,t3) of k[t2,t3]: the least exponent m such that tn∈k[t2,t3] for every n≥m is m=2, and t2 does not generate the conductor alone since t3 is not a multiple of t2 inside the semigroup ring.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an algebraically closed field k of characteristic not two, the semigroup ring A=k[t2,t3]⊆k[t], its maximal ideal m=(t2,t3), and the conductor c=Ann⁡A(k[t]/A)={a∈A:a k[t]⊆A}.

[F1]

The conductor of the normalization of the cusp is c, an ideal of both A and k[t], and the normalization of the cusp is k[t2,t3]↪k[t] with conductor (t2,t3) (The conductor of a normalization, The conductor is an ideal of both rings, Normalizing the cuspidal plane curve).

[F2]

The normalization of the cusp realizes the extension as A=k[t2,t3]⊆k[t], with k[t]=A+At a finite A-module and fraction field k(t), and its conductor is the maximal ideal (t2,t3) (Normalizing the cuspidal plane curve).

[F7]

AC is inherited through the classical localization, normalization, or finite-morphism suppliers cited above (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

1.1F1algebragivenF7

t2 k[t]⊆A: for n≥0 the monomial tn+2 has exponent at least 2, and every exponent ≥2 lies in the numerical semigroup generated by 2 and 3, so tn+2∈A; the same argument gives t3 k[t]⊆A. Hence t2,t3∈c, and since c is an ideal, (t2,t3)⊆c.

1.2F2algebragiven

The semigroup ⟨2,3⟩={0,2,3,4,… } contains every integer n≥2 and misses 1, so the least exponent m with tn∈A for all n≥m is m=2. The element t3 is not a multiple of t2 inside A: an equation t3=t2a with a∈A⊆k[t] would force a=t∉A since k[t] is a domain. Hence t2 alone does not generate the conductor, and the two monomials t2,t3 are both needed.

2.1F1given

Conversely let a∈A satisfy a k[t]⊆A. If a∉(t2,t3), it has a nonzero constant coefficient c and all remaining terms have exponent at least two. Thus at has nonzero coefficient c at exponent one, so at∉A, a contradiction; a=0 lies in (t2,t3). Hence a∈(t2,t3) and c⊆(t2,t3); with step 1.1, c=(t2,t3).

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2∎

Therefore the conductor of the cusp extension k[t2,t3]⊆k[t] is the maximal ideal (t2,t3) of the semigroup ring, whose generators are the first two positive elements of the semigroup: the least exponent from which all monomials lie in k[t2,t3] is 2, and neither generator alone suffices.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources