How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are integrally closed
Statement
For every field and every finite , the ring is an integrally closed domain.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field and an integer .
A UFD is an integral domain in which every nonzero nonunit is a finite product of irreducibles, and any two such products of one element have the same length and matching factors up to order and associates (Unique factorisation domain).
In a domain, a nonzero nonunit is irreducible when forces or to be a unit, and prime when implies or (Irreducible and prime elements of an integral domain).
means for some ; are associates when for a unit (Divisibility and associates in an integral domain, Left inverse, right inverse, and invertible element of a monoid).
Let be a UFD with field of fractions . A polynomial in is primitive when its coefficients have no common nonunit divisor. Then products of primitive polynomials are primitive, and a primitive polynomial of positive degree is irreducible in exactly when it is irreducible in (Gauss lemma over a UFD).
For every field the polynomial ring is a UFD (For every field , is a unique factorisation domain), and every irreducible is prime (Every irreducible polynomial over a field is prime).
An element of a ring is integral over a subring when it is a root of a monic polynomial with coefficients in that subring; the integral closure of a domain in a field extension of is the set of elements integral over , and is integrally closed when every element of integral over already lies in (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers, Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).
is the field of fractions of a domain , with elements the fractions for , (The field of fractions of an integral domain).
A polynomial ring over a domain is a domain (A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain), and so is a polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over a domain (A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain).
Over a domain and for nonzero one has (Over an integral domain, degrees add under multiplication of nonzero polynomials).
Every nonempty subset of has a least element (The well-ordering principle).
A domain is a commutative ring with and no zero divisors, so with implies (Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with and no zero divisors, Cancellation characterises domains: in a commutative ring with , the implication and imply holds if and only if the ring has no zero divisors).
A field is a commutative ring in which every nonzero element is a unit, and it is an integral domain (Field, Every field is a commutative ring with ; it is an integral domain, and it is a commutative division ring).
Proof
Let be a domain with the two properties
(P1) every nonzero nonunit of is a finite product of irreducibles, and > (P2) every irreducible element of is prime.
Then satisfies the uniqueness clause of [L1]: if are two products of irreducibles with , then and after a permutation each is associate to . Indeed is prime by (P2) and divides the product , so by [L2] there is an index with ; writing , the element must be a unit, since otherwise would factor the irreducible into two nonunits, so is associate to by [L3]. Move to the first position and cancel the nonzero factor using [L12]. This gives . If either remaining list is empty, the other must also be empty, since a product containing a nonunit cannot be a unit. Otherwise absorb into , which remains irreducible, and apply induction to the shorter products. This proves the uniqueness clause. [L1, L2, L3, L12, algebra]
Let be a UFD, which by [L1] is a domain, and let have nonzero coefficients . Write for the set of associate classes of irreducibles of . For and , let be the exponent of any representative of in a factorization of ; this is independent of the chosen representative and factorization by the uniqueness clause of [L1]. Set . Only finitely many classes have , because each has only finitely many irreducible factors. For each such class choose one representative , and put The product is finite; its associate class does not depend on the representatives chosen. Each is the exponent of in , so divides every coefficient of and . For every class , some coefficient has , so that coefficient of is not divisible by a representative of . Thus no irreducible divides every coefficient of , and is primitive. If also and satisfies with primitive, then for each the coefficientwise identity gives ; hence and have the same exponent in every associate class and are associates by [L1, L3]. In particular a polynomial is primitive exactly when its content is a unit.
Let be an integral domain. Then is a unit of if and only if is a constant and a unit of ; and if , then is irreducible in if and only if is irreducible in . Indeed, if in then and [L10] gives , so and holds in ; conversely units of are units of . The cases or a unit are excluded from irreducibility in both rings. For a nonzero nonunit , if with then by [L10], so the factorization takes place in , while a factorization in is one in .
Let be a domain with (P1) and (P2) of step 1.1. Then is integrally closed. Indeed let be integral over ; if then , so assume . By [L7] there are with and . For let be the number of irreducible factors in a factorization of when is a nonunit, and when is a unit; by (P1) and step 1.1 this number does not depend on the chosen factorization. Representations exist, so by [L11] we may fix one for which is least. Suppose were not a unit; then with and all irreducible by (P1). By [L6] there is a monic equation with and ; multiplying by gives , so , hence . Since is prime by (P2), iterating [L2] yields . Writing and gives a new representation whose denominator satisfies by step 1.1, contradicting the minimality of . So is a unit, , and every element of integral over lies in : by [L6], is integrally closed.
Let be a UFD and let . Then the contents satisfy (associates). Indeed by step 1.2 both and are primitive, so is primitive by [L4], and applying the uniqueness of contents from step 1.2 to the identity shows that is associate to .
Let be a UFD, , and let be irreducible of positive degree. Then is primitive and irreducible in . If some nonunit divided every coefficient of , then with a nonunit and of positive degree, hence a nonunit of by step 1.3: this contradicts irreducibility of . So is primitive, and then [L4] applied to over the UFD makes irreducible in .
Let be a UFD with , let be primitive, let , and let satisfy . Then . If this is immediate; otherwise and are nonzero, so their contents are defined. Choose with , which is possible by [L7] applied to the finitely many nonzero coefficients of . Applying step 2.2 in the ring to gives , where we used that is primitive, so by step 1.2. On the other hand by the coefficientwise exponent identity of step 1.2. Hence is divisible by , so divides every coefficient of ; writing each coefficient of as with and cancelling in shows that the corresponding coefficient of equals . Therefore all coefficients of lie in .
Let be a UFD and a nonunit. Then is a product of irreducibles of . If then is a nonzero nonunit and [L1] factors it into irreducibles of , each irreducible in by step 1.3. Assume and write with and primitive by step 1.2; then , so is a nonunit of by step 1.3. Retain as a scalar (it may be a unit), and factor the nonzero nonunit in the UFD of [L5] as with each irreducible in and . Each has positive degree, since a nonzero constant element of is a unit there, and each is not a unit because is not. Choose with and write with and primitive, using step 1.2. Then is a nonzero -multiple of the irreducible , hence irreducible in , and it is primitive, so is irreducible in by [L4]. By [L4] the product is primitive, and with . Choose and with , by [L7]. Then in , so step 2.2 and the content identity of step 1.2 give , because by step 1.2; hence divides and lies in . Therefore exhibits as a product of irreducibles of , the nonzero scalar itself being a product of irreducibles if it is a nonunit, or being absorbed into if it is a unit; a unit multiple of an irreducible is irreducible.
Let be a UFD. Then every irreducible element of is prime. If , then is irreducible in by step 1.3. When in , if or then divides that factor; otherwise both are nonzero, and every coefficient of is divisible by . For the associate class , this gives , while step 2.2 gives . Hence or , which says exactly that divides every coefficient of or of , so or in . If , then is primitive and irreducible in by step 2.3, hence prime in by [L5]. If in , then also in , so or in ; say with . Since is primitive, step 3.1 gives , so in . Thus [L2] holds for in .
Let be a UFD. Then is a UFD in which every irreducible is prime: existence of factorizations into irreducibles is step 3.2, and primeness of irreducibles is step 4.1, so the uniqueness clause follows from step 1.1 with (P1) step 3.2 and (P2) step 4.1.
We prove by induction on that is a UFD in which every irreducible element is prime. For the ring is the field by [L8], a UFD in which there are no irreducible elements by [L13] and [L1]. For the ring is , a UFD by [L5] in which every irreducible is prime by [L5], each of these two cases being a base case. For the induction step, if is a UFD, then by [L8] is a UFD with prime irreducibles by step 5.1, so the property holds for every .
Every ring is a domain by [L9], in the case by [L13]. It is integrally closed: for it is a UFD with prime irreducibles by step 6.1, so it satisfies (P1) and (P2) of step 1.1 and step 2.1 makes it integrally closed; for the ring is the field by [L8], and every element of is a fraction with , by [L7], that is, the unit multiple of an element of by [L13], and each element of is a root of the monic polynomial , so every element of integral over lies in .
Depends on
- For every field $F$, $F[x]$ is a unique factorisation domain
- Gauss lemma over a UFD
- Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains
- Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers
- Unique factorisation domain
- Irreducible and prime elements of an integral domain
- Divisibility and associates in an integral domain
- Left inverse, right inverse, and invertible element of a monoid
- The field of fractions $\operatorname{Frac}(D)=(D\setminus\{0\})^{-1}D$ of an integral domain
- Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration
- A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain
- A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain
- Over an integral domain, degrees add under multiplication of nonzero polynomials
- Every irreducible polynomial over a field is prime
- The well-ordering principle
- Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with $1 \ne 0$ and no zero divisors
- Field
- Every field is a commutative ring with $1 \ne 0$; it is an integral domain, and it is a commutative division ring
- Cancellation characterises domains: in a commutative ring with $1 \ne 0$, the implication $ab = ac$ and $a \ne 0$ imply $b = c$ holds if and only if the ring has no zero divisors
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, §10.37 (normal rings) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Lemma 10.161.13 (polynomial N-2) (standard reference, not scraped)