Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalization of a nodal affine plane curve

Statement

Let k be a field of characteristic different from 2. Then the quotient A:=k[x,y]/(y2−x2(x+1)) is an integral domain, the substitution x↦t2−1, y↦t(t2−1) induces an injective k-algebra homomorphism A↪k[t], and the integral closure of A in Frac⁡(A)=k(t) is exactly k[t]=A+At, a finite A-module. Under the resulting parametrisation the origin (0,0) has exactly the two preimages t=1 and t=−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k with char⁡k≠2, the polynomial ring k[x,y], the ideal P=(y2−x2(x+1)), the quotient A=k[x,y]/P, and the substitution σ:k[x,y]→k[t], σ(x)=t2−1, σ(y)=t(t2−1).

[L1]

A ring homomorphism whose kernel contains a two-sided ideal factors uniquely through the quotient ring, so a homomorphism killing P induces a unique homomorphism out of A (A ring homomorphism whose kernel contains a two-sided ideal factors uniquely through the quotient ring, The quotient ring R/I with (r+I)(s+I)=rs+I, Evaluation and roots of a polynomial in a commutative target ring).

[L2]

Division by a monic polynomial over a commutative ring R: for monic g∈R[s] and any f∈R[s] there are unique q,r with f=qg+r and r=0 or deg⁡r<deg⁡g (Division by a monic polynomial over a commutative ring, Degree, leading coefficient and monic polynomial, with the zero polynomial having no degree).

[L4]

For a field F and d≥0 the ring F[y1,…,yd] is an integrally closed domain (Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are integrally closed, Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).

[L5]

Over a nonzero commutative ring, for nonzero polynomials f,g, the coefficient of sdeg⁡f+deg⁡g in fg is the product of the leading coefficients, and sm has leading coefficient 1 with degree m (Degree inequalities for sums and products over a commutative ring, Degree, leading coefficient and monic polynomial, with the zero polynomial having no degree).

[L6]

Integrality means being a root of a monic polynomial over the base; integrality is transitive along domain inclusions; integral elements form a subring; an integrally closed domain contains the integral elements of its fraction field (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers, Integral extensions are transitive, Integral elements over a nonzero base ring form a subring, Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1given

The substitution σ kills P: σ(y)2−σ(x)2(σ(x)+1)=t2(t2−1)2−(t2−1)2t2=0, because σ(x)+1=t2 and σ(y)=t(t2−1). By [L1] it therefore induces a unique k-algebra homomorphism φ:A→k[t] with φ(xˉ)=t2−1 and φ(yˉ)=t(t2−1), where xˉ,yˉ are the classes of x,y.

1.2L2L3L5given

φ is injective. By [L2], applied in the polynomial ring (k[x])[y] to the monic polynomial y2−x2(x+1) of degree 2, every element of A has a unique representative a(x)+b(x)y with a,b∈k[x]; hence it suffices to show that φ(a+by)=a(t2−1)+t(t2−1)b(t2−1)=0 forces a=b=0. The first summand is a polynomial in t2 and the second is t times a polynomial in t2, so comparing the coefficients of t2m and of t2m+1 in the sum gives a(t2−1)=0 and (t2−1)b(t2−1)=0 separately. For a polynomial c=∑m≤Mcmsm with cM≠0, the value c(t2−1)=∑mcm(t2−1)m has coefficient cM at t2M by [L5], since (t2−1)m is monic of degree 2m and all lower terms have degrees <2M; hence c(t2−1)≠0. Applying this to c=a gives a=0. Since k[t] is a domain by [L3] and t2−1≠0 (it is monic of degree 2), (t2−1)b(t2−1)=0 forces b(t2−1)=0, and the same argument gives b=0. So φ is injective, and A is a domain, a k-subalgebra of k[t].

2.1L3L6step 1.2

In Frac⁡(A) one has φ(yˉ)=t φ(xˉ) with φ(xˉ)=t2−1≠0, so t=yˉ/xˉ∈Frac⁡(A); hence k[t]⊆Frac⁡(A) and k(t)=Frac⁡(k[t])⊆Frac⁡(A) by [L3], while A⊆k[t] gives the reverse inclusion, so Frac⁡(A)=k(t). Moreover φ(xˉ)+1=t2, so t is a root of the monic polynomial T2−(xˉ+1)∈A[T] and is integral over A by [L6]; and k[t]=A+At, because t2=xˉ+1∈A reduces all exponents modulo 2, so k[t] is a finite A-module and every element of k[t] is integral over A.

3.1L3L4L6step 2.1

If z∈k(t)=Frac⁡(A) is integral over A, then a monic equation for z over A has coefficients in A⊆k[t], so z is integral over k[t]; since k[t] is integrally closed in k(t) by [L4] and [L3], z∈k[t]. With step 2.1 this identifies the integral closure of A in Frac⁡(A) with k[t]=A+At, a finite A-module.

4.1L3step 1.2given∎

The parametrisation: a point of the curve with xˉ=0 has yˉ2=0, so yˉ=0 in the field k; thus the origin is the unique point with both coordinates zero. Under the parametrisation x=t2−1, y=t(t2−1) the condition x=0 is t2=1, that is t2−1=(t−1)(t+1)=0, so t=1 or t=−1 by [L3] (a product of two elements of the field k vanishes only if one factor does); these two values are distinct because char⁡k≠2 gives 1≠−1, and both give y=t(t2−1)=0. Hence the origin has exactly the two preimages t=1 and t=−1; the hypothesis char⁡k≠2 is used here, since in characteristic 2 the two values coincide.

Remarks

Write C(k)={(a,b)∈k2:b2=a2(a+1)}. The coordinate-ring inclusion φ:A↪k[t] corresponds on k-points to the parametrisation ν:k→C(k), u↦(u2−1,u(u2−1)). The diagram isolates the fibre over the node; the vertical arrows are set inclusions.

kC(k)f1;¡1gf(0;0)gºº

Both routes from {1,−1} to C(k) send each parameter to (0,0). As computed in proof step 4.1, u2−1=0 forces u=1 or u=−1, and these values are distinct because char⁡k≠2. Thus the lower left set is the entire fibre, over the given field k. The proof above is independent of the illustration.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources