How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially
Statement
Let be a dominant rational map between classical affine varieties. Then pullback along any representative induces an injective -algebra homomorphism This construction is independent of the representative and is functorial under composition of dominant rational maps.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Classical affine varieties and and a dominant rational map .
The function field of a classical affine variety is the fraction field of its coordinate ring (The function field of an irreducible classical affine variety).
The domain of definition of is the union of the affine opens on which it has representatives (The maximal domain of definition of a rational map to an affine variety).
A dominant rational map is one whose representative on has dense image in (Dominant morphisms and dominant rational maps).
A morphism between affine varieties corresponds to a pullback homomorphism on coordinate rings (Affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms).
The coordinate ring of a classical affine variety is an integral domain (A classical affine variety has a domain as its coordinate ring, and conversely).
Every nonempty affine open has the same function field as the ambient variety (All nonempty affine opens of an irreducible affine variety have the same function field).
The principal open is the set where is nonzero (A principal open subset of a classical affine variety).
Every nonempty open subset of a classical affine variety is dense (Every nonempty open subset of an affine variety is dense).
Proof
Choose a representative morphism of on a nonempty affine open , guaranteed by [L2]. By [L4], induces a -algebra homomorphism . Using [L6] and [L1], regard as a subring of .
The map is injective. Let . By [L5], the ring is a domain, so [L7] makes a nonempty open subset of . Let be the representative from [L3] whose image is dense in . By the definition of rational map, and agree on some nonempty open subset . Since is a nonempty open subset of the classical affine variety , [L8] makes dense in , hence dense in the open subspace . Therefore is dense in , which is dense in . Because , the image is dense in . It follows that meets , so for some one has . Hence .
For , define . This is well defined because step 2.1 makes nonzero whenever .
If is another representative of , then by the definition of rational map the two representatives agree on some nonempty affine open . Their coordinate-ring pullbacks therefore agree on , and after passing to fraction fields and using [L6] for , the two constructions of step 3.1 agree in . Thus is independent of the chosen representative.
Let be another dominant rational map, represented on some nonempty affine open of . On a common domain where both pullbacks are defined, pullback of regular functions satisfies for every . By fraction-field arithmetic the same identity holds for every element of . Therefore pullback on function fields is functorial.
Depends on
- The maximal domain of definition of a rational map to an affine variety
- Dominant morphisms and dominant rational maps
- The function field of an irreducible classical affine variety
- A principal open subset of a classical affine variety
- Affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms
- A classical affine variety has a domain as its coordinate ring, and conversely
- All nonempty affine opens of an irreducible affine variety have the same function field
- Every nonempty open subset of an affine variety is dense
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Chapter 5k-l (standard reference, not scraped)
- Donu Arapura, Notes on Basic Algebraic Geometry, §3.1-§3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)