Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially

Statement

Let η:X⇢Y be a dominant rational map between classical affine varieties. Then pullback along any representative induces an injective k-algebra homomorphism η∗:k(Y)↪k(X). This construction is independent of the representative and is functorial under composition of dominant rational maps.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Classical affine varieties X and Y and a dominant rational map η:X⇢Y.

[L1]

The function field of a classical affine variety is the fraction field of its coordinate ring (The function field of an irreducible classical affine variety).

[L2]

The domain of definition of η is the union of the affine opens on which it has representatives (The maximal domain of definition of a rational map to an affine variety).

[L3]

A dominant rational map is one whose representative on Dom⁡(η) has dense image in Y (Dominant morphisms and dominant rational maps).

[L4]

A morphism between affine varieties corresponds to a pullback homomorphism on coordinate rings (Affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms).

[L5]

The coordinate ring of a classical affine variety is an integral domain (A classical affine variety has a domain as its coordinate ring, and conversely).

[L6]

Every nonempty affine open has the same function field as the ambient variety (All nonempty affine opens of an irreducible affine variety have the same function field).

[L7]

The principal open DY(h) is the set where h is nonzero (A principal open subset of a classical affine variety).

[L8]

Every nonempty open subset of a classical affine variety is dense (Every nonempty open subset of an affine variety is dense).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2L4L6given

Choose a representative morphism φ:U→Y of η on a nonempty affine open U⊆X, guaranteed by [L2]. By [L4], φ induces a k-algebra homomorphism φ∗:k[Y]→k[U]. Using [L6] and [L1], regard k[U] as a subring of k(X).

2.1L3L5L7L8step 1.1

The map φ∗ is injective. Let 0≠h∈k[Y]. By [L5], the ring k[Y] is a domain, so [L7] makes DY(h) a nonempty open subset of Y. Let ψ:Dom⁡(η)→Y be the representative from [L3] whose image is dense in Y. By the definition of rational map, ψ and φ agree on some nonempty open subset W⊆U. Since W is a nonempty open subset of the classical affine variety X, [L8] makes W dense in X, hence dense in the open subspace Dom⁡(η). Therefore ψ(W) is dense in ψ(Dom⁡(η)), which is dense in Y. Because φ(W)=ψ(W)⊆φ(U), the image φ(U) is dense in Y. It follows that φ(U) meets DY(h), so for some u∈U one has φ∗(h)(u)=h(φ(u))≠0. Hence φ∗(h)≠0.

3.1L1L6step 1.1step 2.1

For a/b∈k(Y)=Frac⁡(k[Y]), define η∗(a/b):=φ∗(a)/φ∗(b)∈Frac⁡(k[U])=k(X). This is well defined because step 2.1 makes φ∗(b) nonzero whenever b≠0.

4.1L1L6step 1.1step 3.1

If ψ:V→Y is another representative of η, then by the definition of rational map the two representatives agree on some nonempty affine open W⊆U∩V. Their coordinate-ring pullbacks therefore agree on k[Y], and after passing to fraction fields and using [L6] for W, the two constructions of step 3.1 agree in k(X). Thus η∗ is independent of the chosen representative.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

Let θ:Y⇢Z be another dominant rational map, represented on some nonempty affine open of Y. On a common domain where both pullbacks are defined, pullback of regular functions satisfies (θ∘η)∗(h)=η∗(θ∗(h)) for every h∈k[Z]. By fraction-field arithmetic the same identity holds for every element of k(Z). Therefore pullback on function fields is functorial.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources