How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A classical affine variety has a domain as its coordinate ring, and conversely
Statement
Let be an algebraically closed field and let be a nonempty affine algebraic set. Then is a classical affine variety if and only if its coordinate ring is an integral domain.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An algebraically closed field and a nonempty affine algebraic set .
The coordinate ring of is (The coordinate ring of an affine algebraic set).
A nonempty affine algebraic set is irreducible exactly when its vanishing ideal is prime (Affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible ones to prime ideals).
For a commutative ring and ideal , the quotient is an integral domain if and only if is prime ( is an integral domain if and only if is a prime ideal).
Proof
By [L2], the set is a classical affine variety exactly when is a prime ideal of .
By [L1] and [L3], the coordinate ring is an integral domain exactly when the ideal is prime.
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove that is a classical affine variety if and only if is an integral domain.
Depends on
Used by
- The function field of an irreducible classical affine variety Definition
- The hyperbola xy = 1 is isomorphic to the punctured affine line Example
- Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially Lemma
- All nonempty affine opens of an irreducible affine variety have the same function field Theorem
- The product of affine varieties has coordinate ring k[X] tensorₖ k[Y] Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Proposition 2.27 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Donu Arapura, Notes on Basic Algebraic Geometry, Lemma 1.5.4 (standard reference, not scraped)