Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalizing the nodal plane curve

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let X=V(y2−x2(x+1))⊆A2 over an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two. Its normalization is A1→X, t↦(t2−1,t(t2−1)), a finite birational map whose fibre over the node consists of the two points t=±1. The node is not unibranch, so it is not normal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an algebraically closed field k with char⁡k≠2, the polynomial P=y2−x2(x+1), the curve X=V(P)⊆A2, its coordinate ring A=k[X]=k[x,y]/(P), the substitution σ(x)=t2−1, σ(y)=t(t2−1), and the induced map φ ⁣:A→k[t].

[F1]

A ring homomorphism whose kernel contains an ideal factors uniquely through the quotient, so σ induces a unique k-algebra homomorphism φ ⁣:A→k[t] once it kills P (A ring homomorphism whose kernel contains a two-sided ideal factors uniquely through the quotient ring, The quotient ring R/I with (r+I)(s+I)=rs+I, Evaluation and roots of a polynomial in a commutative target ring).

[F2]

Division by the monic polynomial y2−x2(x+1)∈(k[x])[y] gives every class in A a unique representative a(x)+b(x)y; over a field the polynomial ring is a domain and a product of nonzero polynomials has the product of leading coefficients as leading coefficient (Division by a monic polynomial over a commutative ring, Degree, leading coefficient and monic polynomial, with the zero polynomial having no degree, A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain, Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with 1≠0 and no zero divisors).

[F4]

The normalization of the affine curve is the affine variety with coordinate ring the integral closure of A in its fraction field, with structure morphism induced by the inclusion; it is finite, surjective and birational (The normalization of an irreducible affine variety, Normalization is finite, surjective and birational, Finite normalization commutes with principal localization, A finite-type domain over a field has finite normalization, Affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms); the affine line is normal (Affine space is normal).

[F5]

A point is unibranch when its normalization fibre is a single point, and every normal point is unibranch (Unibranch points of a classical variety).

[F7]

AC is inherited through the classical localization, normalization, or finite-morphism suppliers cited above (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

1.1F1givenF7

The substitution kills P: σ(y)2−σ(x)2(σ(x)+1)=t2(t2−1)2−(t2−1)2t2=0, because σ(x)+1=t2. By [F1] there is a unique k-algebra homomorphism φ ⁣:A→k[t] with φ(xˉ)=t2−1 and φ(yˉ)=t(t2−1).

2.1F2step 1.1

The map φ is injective. By [F2] every element of A is uniquely a(x)+b(x)y with a,b∈k[x], and φ(a+by)=a(t2−1)+t(t2−1)b(t2−1) separates into an even part a(t2−1) and an odd part t (t2−1)b(t2−1), so φ(a+by)=0 forces both parts to vanish. If c∈k[x] is nonzero then c(t2−1)≠0: the term of highest degree 2deg⁡c has coefficient equal to the leading coefficient of c by [F2]. Hence a=0, and since k[t] is a domain and t2−1≠0 we get b(t2−1)=0, hence b=0. So φ is injective and A is a domain, isomorphic to k[t2−1,t(t2−1)]. If a polynomial Q(x,y) vanishes on X, its substitution vanishes at every t∈k under the displayed parametrization. The field k is infinite, so this substituted polynomial is zero. The kernel just computed is (P), hence I(X)=(P), justifying the coordinate-ring identification in the Given.

3.1F2F3step 2.1

In Frac⁡(A) one has yˉ/xˉ=(t3−t)/(t2−1)=t, so k(t)⊆Frac⁡(A), and A⊆k[t] gives the reverse inclusion; hence Frac⁡(A)=k(t). Moreover t2=xˉ+1∈A, so t is integral over A, and since tn=tn−2(xˉ+1) for n≥2 we get k[t]=A+At, a finite A-module.

4.1F3step 3.1

If z∈k(t)=Frac⁡(A) is integral over A, then a monic equation for z over A has coefficients in k[t], so z is integral over k[t] and hence lies in k[t] because k[t] is integrally closed [F3]. Conversely every element of k[t]=A+At is integral over A by step 3.1. Therefore the integral closure of A in Frac⁡(A) is exactly k[t].

5.1F4step 4.1

By [F4] the normalization of X is the affine variety with coordinate ring k[t], namely A1, with the structure morphism ν ⁣:A1→X induced by A↪k[t]; by [F4] applied to the parametrization this is ν(t)=(t2−1,t(t2−1)), a finite birational map, and it is surjective.

6.1F4F5step 5.1

The fibre of ν over the node (0,0) consists of the parameters with t2−1=0, namely t=1 and t=−1; these are distinct because char⁡k≠2, and both map to the origin because t(t2−1)=0. Hence the node has a two-point normalization fibre, so it is not unibranch [F5]; since normal points are unibranch [F5], the node is not normal.

7.1F4F5step 5.1step 6.1∎

Summing up, the normalization of the nodal curve is the finite birational surjection ν ⁣:A1→X, t↦(t2−1,t(t2−1)), whose fibre over the node is the two-point set {1,−1}; the node is therefore not unibranch and not normal.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

92 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources