Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Irreducible affine varieties are birational exactly when their function fields are isomorphic

Statement

Let X and Y be classical affine varieties. Then X and Y are birationally equivalent if and only if their function fields are isomorphic as extensions of k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Classical affine varieties X and Y.

[L1]

A birational map is a rational map admitting a rational inverse (Birational maps and birational equivalence of classical affine varieties).

[L2]

Dominant rational maps X⇢Y correspond exactly to injective k-homomorphisms k(Y)↪k(X) (Dominant rational maps to an affine variety correspond to injective homomorphisms of function fields).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2given

Suppose η:X⇢Y is birational, with inverse θ:Y⇢X. By [L2], both maps induce injective pullbacks η∗:k(Y)↪k(X) and θ∗:k(X)↪k(Y). Because pullback is functorial, (θ∘η)∗=η∗∘θ∗ and (η∘θ)∗=θ∗∘η∗. Since the two compositions are identity rational maps by [L1], the two field homomorphisms are inverse isomorphisms.

1.2L1L2

Conversely, let σ:k(Y)→∼k(X) be a field isomorphism. By [L2], the map σ comes from a dominant rational map η:X⇢Y, and σ−1 comes from a dominant rational map θ:Y⇢X. Applying [L2] again to the compositions shows that θ∘η and η∘θ induce the identity on function fields, so they are the identity rational maps. Hence η is birational.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2∎

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove that X and Y are birationally equivalent exactly when k(X)≅k(Y) as k-extensions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources