How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Universal property of the normalization
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be an irreducible classical variety over an algebraically closed field with normalization . If is a dominant birational morphism from an irreducible normal variety , then there is a unique morphism with . In the affine case the corresponding ring statement is: if with integrally closed, then the integral closure of lies in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the algebraically closed field , the irreducible variety with normalization , the irreducible normal variety , the dominant birational morphism , and a finite affine cover of by affine charts with normalizations and coordinate rings .
The normalization restricts over each affine chart to the affine normalization: with the integral closure of in , and (The normalization of an irreducible affine variety, Normalization of a classical variety by gluing affine normalizations).
All charts of share the function field , birational morphisms induce isomorphisms of function fields, and a dominant morphism pulls back function fields injectively (Compatible affine charts of an integral classical variety have one function field, Classical integral varieties are birational exactly when their function fields are isomorphic over , Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially, Dominant morphisms and dominant rational maps, Birational maps and birational equivalence of classical affine varieties).
Normality of means every local ring is an integrally closed domain, and an integrally closed domain contains every element of its fraction field integral over it (Normal points and normal varieties, Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).
For an affine target, morphisms correspond contravariantly to -algebra homomorphisms; morphisms to an affine target glue over an open cover, and two morphisms agreeing on a dense open agree (Classical affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms, Compatible classical morphisms to an affine target glue over an open cover, Morphisms defined on an open source and agreeing on a dense open agree on their common domain, Integral classical varieties in the compatible affine-atlas register, Classical varieties have finite irreducible decompositions).
Proof
The affine ring statement: let with integrally closed, and let be the integral closure of in . Every is integral over , hence integral over , and lies in ; since is integrally closed, . Thus , and the inclusion is a -algebra map extending .
Local construction. Let be a chart of and put , an open subvariety of the irreducible normal variety , hence normal. Read the pullback of functions in the common function fields: birational gives , and is dominant. For the element is integral over ; its pullback lies in , and at every point the pullback of is contained in the local ring (pullback of functions regular at is regular at ). The local ring is an integrally closed domain [F3], so for every ; hence is a regular function on . The resulting -algebra map extending defines, on each affine chart of , a morphism by the anti-equivalence [F4]; these morphisms agree by their pullback maps and glue by [F4] to a morphism with .
Gluing and uniqueness. On an overlap , the morphisms and have the same pullback on the common function field , because both are determined by the identifications ; hence they agree on the dense open intersection by [F4], and they glue to a morphism over with . If is another such morphism, then and have the same pullback on rational functions on (both equal the given identification ), so they agree on a dense open and hence everywhere by the equality lemma [F4]; this proves uniqueness. The affine statement of step 1.1 is the chartwise content of the construction, and the morphism is the normalization by [F1].
Depends on
- Normal points and normal varieties
- The normalization of an irreducible affine variety
- Normalization of a classical variety by gluing affine normalizations
- Compatible affine charts of an integral classical variety have one function field
- Classical integral varieties are birational exactly when their function fields are isomorphic over $k$
- Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially
- Classical affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms
- Integral classical varieties in the compatible affine-atlas register
- Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains
- Morphisms defined on an open source and agreeing on a dense open agree on their common domain
- Compatible classical morphisms to an affine target glue over an open cover
- The Axiom of Choice
- Dominant morphisms and dominant rational maps
- Birational maps and birational equivalence of classical affine varieties
- Classical varieties have finite irreducible decompositions
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
66 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry (2025 version), Ch. 8 §a-b: the universal property of the normalization (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 29.55.5 (normalization and its universal property) (standard reference, not scraped)