Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth orbits are locally closed and their orbit maps are faithfully flat over every field

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let G be a smooth algebraic group scheme of finite type over k (Smooth morphism of schemes) acting on a separated finite-type k-scheme X (Algebraic group actions, orbit maps, orbit subschemes and scheme-theoretic stabilizers), and let x∈X(k) (Fibres of the orbit map and the scheme-theoretic stabilizer as a closed subgroup scheme). Then the orbit subscheme Ox is locally closed in X and stable under G, and the orbit map ϱx:G→Ox is faithfully flat and locally of finite presentation. In particular Ox is smooth over k and of finite type. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the named suppliers and is used to choose an algebraic closure, field bases and closed points in the proof.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a field k, a smooth finite-type k-group scheme G acting on a separated finite-type k-scheme X through α, and a point x∈X(k) with orbit map ϱx.

[F1]

For a quasi-compact morphism f:X→Y the ideal I=ker⁡(OY→f∗OX) is quasi-coherent and V(I) is the scheme-theoretic image of f, with restriction to every open of Y (Scheme-theoretic image of a quasi-compact morphism, Scheme-theoretic image).

[F2]

For a finitely presented ring map A→B the image of a basic open D(b)⊆Spec⁡B in Spec⁡A is constructible, and constructible subsets are the finite unions of locally closed subsets (Constructible images for finite-presentation affine maps, Constructible subsets of a scheme). A finitely generated algebra over a Noetherian ring is finitely presented (Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is finitely presented).

[F3]

An integral ring map is closed on spectra: for A→B integral and J⊆B an ideal, the image of V(J) is V(J∩A), by lying over applied to the induced integral injection A/(J∩A)→B/J (Lying over for integral ring maps).

[F4]

A smooth morphism is locally of finite presentation, flat, and has geometrically regular fibres; over a field k, smoothness of G means that for every field extension K/k the local rings of GK=G×kK are regular at all points (Smooth morphism of schemes, Geometrically regular algebras and geometrically regular fibres). Regular local rings are domains (regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay), hence GK is reduced: a nilpotent section vanishes in every stalk, so is zero.

[F5]

A reduced commutative ring has zero ideal equal to the intersection of its prime ideals, so it embeds into the product of the residue fields of its primes (A ring is reduced exactly when zero is an intersection of primes).

[F6]

Over an algebraically closed field K, a maximal ideal of a finitely generated K-algebra is the vanishing ideal of a K-point, and closed points of finite-type K-schemes have residue field K; maximal ideals exist by AC (Over an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal, Affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible ones to prime ideals, In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal).

[F7]

The tensor product of modules distributes over direct sums, as follows from its defining generators and relations; consequently if K1,K2 are fields over a common field F, then K1⊗FK2≅⨁iK1≠0 for any F-basis of K2 containing 1 (The tensor product M⊗RN from the additive group underlying the free Z-module on M×N, elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums).

[F8]

For a finite-type morphism over a Noetherian integral base there is a dense open over which the morphism is flat (Generic flatness for finite type morphisms over Noetherian integral bases).

[F9]

A nonempty reduced finite-type scheme over a perfect field has a nonempty open regular locus, and regularity is equivalent to smoothness over a perfect field; the smooth locus of a locally finitely presented morphism is open (Dense regular loci on every component, Regular equals smooth over a perfect field, The smooth locus is open). The classical and scheme smoothness conventions agree by Classical and scheme smoothness over a perfect field.

[F10]

Flatness descends along faithfully flat ring maps, and geometric regularity descends along field extensions (Flatness descends along faithfully flat base change, Field tests for geometric regularity).

[F11]

Fibre products represent pairs of morphisms with equal base image (Fibre product of schemes); an immersion is separated (Open and closed immersions are separated).

[F12]

A field is Noetherian, and a finite-type algebra over a Noetherian ring is Noetherian (A field has only the zero ideal and itself, hence is Noetherian, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring). Thus every affine coordinate algebra of the finite-type schemes here is Noetherian.

Proof

Given: AC, the smooth finite-type k-group scheme G acting on the separated finite-type k-scheme X, and x∈X(k).

1.1F1givenconstruct

The orbit map ϱx is quasi-compact, so by [F1] its scheme-theoretic image Y=V(I)↪X exists. Let Zk:=ϱx(∣G∣). Its closure is the underlying space of Y: on an affine target chart with finitely many source charts, if a basic open D(a) misses the image then every source algebra localized at a is zero. A power of a vanishes in each of the finitely many algebras, so a common power belongs to the kernel defining Y, and D(a) misses Y. The reverse inclusion follows because the image lies in Y. On an affine chart Spec⁡A⊆X with ϱx−1(Spec⁡A) covered by finitely many affine charts Spec⁡Bj, the ideal is I=ker⁡(A→∏jBj), and for every field extension K/k one has I⊗kK=ker⁡(AK→∏j(Bj⊗kK)) because k→K is flat and tensor products are right exact and commute with finite products; hence YK:=Y×kK is the scheme-theoretic image of ϱx,K and YK is the closure of ZK:=ϱx,K(∣GK∣) in XK.

1.2F2F12givenconstruct

For K=kˉ the set ZK is constructible in XK: cover the quasi-compact XK by finitely many affine charts Spec⁡A, cover each preimage by finitely many affine charts Spec⁡Bj, and each A is Noetherian by [F12], and Bj is a finite-type A-algebra because it is generated by finitely many elements over K. Hence [F2] gives finite presentation, so apply [F2] to A→Bj and to b=1; the full scheme-point image is the finite union of these constructible images.

1.3F3givenalgebra

The projection π:YK→Y is surjective and closed. It is the base change of Spec⁡K→Spec⁡k, which is surjective; and K/k is algebraic, hence integral, so YK→Y is integral and, by [F3], the image of any closed V(J)⊆YK is the closed set V(J∩Y); a surjective closed map is a quotient map.

2.1F4step 1.1algebra

The scheme Y is geometrically reduced: by step 1.1 it suffices to note that each Bj⊗kK is reduced, since GK has regular local rings by [F4], and that AK/I⊗kK embeds into the product of the reduced rings Bj⊗kK.

2.2F6step 1.1step 1.2construct

Since ZK is constructible by step 1.2 and dense in YK by step 1.1, it contains a dense open U of YK: writing ZK as a finite union of locally closed subsets and intersecting with the finitely many irreducible components of the Noetherian space YK, one piece is dense in each component, and a locally closed subset dense in an irreducible space contains an open dense subset of it; remove from YK the finitely many closed complements of those relative opens and all intersections of distinct components. The remaining subset is open and dense in YK and contained in ZK. Moreover every nonempty constructible subset of YK contains a point closed in YK: a nonempty locally closed piece has a nonempty open subset of an affine chart, and by [F6] that open contains a K-point of the chart, which is closed in YK because its residue field is K.

2.3F7F11step 1.3givenalgebra

The image is saturated for π: for a point y∈YK with q=π(y) one has GK×XK,ySpec⁡κ(y)≅G×XSpec⁡κ(y), because the morphism Spec⁡κ(y)→X factors through Spec⁡κ(q)→X; this in turn is isomorphic to Gq×Spec⁡κ(q)Spec⁡κ(y) with Gq=G×X,qSpec⁡κ(q), and the latter is nonempty whenever Gq is, by [F7]. Since Gq is nonempty exactly when q lies in Zk=ϱx(∣G∣), this shows y∈ZK if and only if π(y)∈Zk, so π−1(π(ZK))=ZK.

3.1F1F6step 2.1step 2.2givenchoose

Each translation by g∈G(K) preserves YK: translating ϱx,K is precomposing it with left translation on GK, so its scheme-theoretic image is unchanged by [F1]. Set OK:=ZK with the open subscheme structure it has in YK; this is legitimate because ZK is open in YK: every closed point c of ZK lifts to a K-point h of GK by [F6] applied to the nonempty finite-type fibre of ϱx,K over c, and with a K-point v of the nonempty open ϱx,K−1(U) one has c=ϱx,K(h)=(hv−1)⋅ϱx,K(v)∈(hv−1)U, so that ⋃g∈G(K)gU is an open subset of ZK containing every closed point of ZK; its constructible complement in ZK would otherwise contain a closed point of YK by step 2.2, so ZK=⋃g∈G(K)gU is open in YK. By step 2.1 the open subscheme OK is reduced, and it is finite type over K because it is locally of finite type as a locally closed subscheme of the finite-type XK and quasi-compact as the continuous image of the quasi-compact space GK.

3.2step 1.3step 2.3givenconstruct

The morphism ϱx,K:GK→OK is surjective by construction, and ϱx(∣G∣)=π(ZK) is open in Y: by step 1.3 and step 2.3 the set π−1(π(ZK))=ZK is open, and π is a quotient map, so π(ZK) is open. Define Ox:=π(ZK) with the induced open subscheme structure in Y; it is finite type over k, since it is locally of finite type as a locally closed subscheme of the finite-type X and quasi-compact as the image of the quasi-compact space G under ϱx, and (Ox)K=OK as open subschemes of YK.

4.1F4F5F7step 2.1step 3.1constructalgebra

Reduced-source factorization. For F=k or F=K, write OF=Ox or OK respectively. The image YF is geometrically reduced by step 2.1. Every translation by a point of G(F) preserves the scheme-theoretic image, since translating ϱx,F is the same as precomposing it with left translation on GF. Moreover the action on GF×FOF has underlying image in OF: after extending a residue field further, any orbit point has a lift to G, and acting on that lift gives another lift. On affine charts let A be a geometrically reduced algebra for GF and let C be a reduced algebra for OF. The map A⊗FC→∏p∈Spec⁡C(A⊗Fκ(p)) is injective: write a tensor with a finite independent list of coefficients in A, and coefficient comparison after scalar extension shows that each corresponding element of C lies in all primes, hence is zero by [F5]. The target factors are reduced because GF is smooth by [F4], so GF×FOF is reduced. Thus both this action source and GF are reduced. Pulling back a section of the ideal of YF gives a function vanishing in every residue field of the source, hence zero by [F5]; both morphisms therefore factor through YF. Since their images lie in its open OF, they then factor through OF. Applied to F=K, this establishes the action and orbit map over K without asserting that OK is open in XK.

4.2step 3.1F6F9givenchoose

The subscheme OK is smooth over K: it is reduced by step 3.1 and finite type over the perfect field K; by [F9] its regular locus is a nonempty open subset, regularity equals smoothness over K, and the smooth locus Sm is a nonempty open subset stable under the K-automorphisms g∈G(K). Since every K-point of OK is of the form g⋅xK (the fibre over a K-point of OK is a nonempty finite-type K-scheme, hence has a K-point by [F6]), and since a nonempty open subset of a finite-type K-scheme contains a K-point by [F6], Sm meets G(K)⋅xK; then xK∈Sm and all K-points of OK lie in Sm. The closed complement OK∖Sm, if nonempty, would contain a closed K-point by [F6], contradicting the preceding conclusion. Thus Sm=OK.

4.3F6F8F12step 3.1step 3.2algebrachoose

The morphism ϱx,K is faithfully flat: it is surjective by step 3.2; for flatness, apply [F8] on the finitely many disjoint integral open pieces of OK obtained by deleting the intersections of its irreducible components, obtaining a dense open V⊆OK over which ϱx,K is flat. Every closed point c of OK lies in some translate gV by the argument of step 3.1, and over gV the morphism ϱx,K is conjugate by the isomorphisms w↦gw and v↦gv to the flat morphism over V, hence is flat there; the union of the translates contains all closed points, so its closed complement is empty by [F6] and it is all of OK and ϱx,K is flat at every point.

5.1F4F5step 3.2step 4.1construct

The factorization over k. The same argument in step 4.1 with F=k applies to Ox, the reduced open subscheme of Y constructed in step 3.2. Its underlying image is ∣ϱx∣(∣G∣), stable under the action by the field-lift argument, so G×kOx→X and G→X factor first through Y and then its open Ox. Hence Ox is G-stable and ϱx:G→Ox is a morphism, with image Ox. Its base change is the orbit morphism GK→OK because (Ox)K=OK by step 3.2.

5.2F10step 3.2step 4.3algebra

Flatness and faithful flatness descend to k: the base changed morphism (ϱx)K is ϱx,K, which is faithfully flat by step 4.3 and surjective by step 3.2, and (Ox)K=OK; flatness is checked on affine charts, where it descends along the faithfully flat ring map k→K by [F10].

6.1F2F10F12step 3.2step 5.1step 4.2step 5.2∎

Finally Ox is smooth over k: by step 4.2 the base change OK=(Ox)K is smooth over K; a finite-type k-algebra A with A⊗kK smooth, hence geometrically regular, over K is geometrically regular over k by [F10] and therefore smooth over k. Thus Ox is a locally closed, G-stable, smooth finite-type k-subscheme of X, and ϱx:G→Ox is faithfully flat by step 5.2 and locally of finite presentation: on affine charts their ring map is of finite type, since its target is generated by finitely many elements over k, and its source is Noetherian by [F12]; [F2] then gives finite presentation.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

179 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources