How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Immersion of schemes
Definition
A morphism of schemes is an immersion, also called a locally closed immersion, if there exist an open subscheme (Open immersions of schemes) and a closed immersion (Closed immersions of schemes) with . A factorization is a device exhibiting , not extra data attached to it: whether is an immersion is a property of the morphism alone, and closed immersions () and open immersions (with an isomorphism onto ) are immersions.
For such a factorization the image is closed in the open subscheme , hence is a locally closed subset of , and identifies with a closed subscheme of ; one says that carries the induced locally closed subscheme structure on that image. Since is a homeomorphism onto , the induced structure is unchanged when the ambient open subscheme is replaced by a smaller one containing , so the property may be checked after restricting the target to any open subscheme containing the image.
Depends on
Used by
- Global generation does not imply very ampleness Counterexample
- Algebraic group actions, orbit maps, orbit subschemes and scheme-theoretic stabilizers Definition
- Quasi-projective morphisms before Proj Definition
- Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention Definition
- The conic map from O(2) Example
- The quotient of GL2 by the diagonal torus is the complement of the diagonal in P1 x P1 Example
- A quasi-compact immersion with nonclosed image has a boundary specialization Lemma
- Affine finite-type source immerses into relative projective space Lemma
- An immersion with closed image is a closed immersion Lemma
- Chow lemma for proper Noetherian schemes Lemma
- Divisor ampleness and quasi-projectivity of group models Lemma
- Every scheme diagonal is an immersion Lemma
- Fibres of the orbit map and the scheme-theoretic stabilizer as a closed subgroup scheme Lemma
- Fpqc descent of properness components Lemma
- Open and closed immersions are separated Lemma
- Smooth orbits are locally closed and their orbit maps are faithfully flat over every field Lemma
- SNC projective compactifications of smooth quasiprojective varieties Lemma
- Bertini smoothness away from the base locus Theorem
- High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme Theorem
- Homogeneous spaces of smooth affine groups are separated schemes Theorem
- Immersions are monomorphisms locally of finite type Theorem
- Veronese embedding pulls O(1) back to O(d) Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Schemes, Definition 26.10.2(5) and Section 26.21.2, printed pp.18, 39-40 (standard reference, not scraped)