Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every scheme diagonal is an immersion

Statement

For every morphism of schemes f:X→S, the diagonal ΔX/S is an immersion (Immersion of schemes). It identifies X with a locally closed subscheme of X×SX. A point z of X×SX lies in its image if and only if the two projections carry z to one and the same point x of X and induce one and the same map of residue fields κ(x)→κ(z).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A morphism of schemes f:X→S, its diagonal ΔX/S and the projections pr⁡1,pr⁡2:X×SX→X.

[F1]

The diagonal morphism is the unique ΔX/S:X→X×SX with pr⁡1ΔX/S=id⁡X=pr⁡2ΔX/S. (The diagonal morphism)

[F2]

A morphism is an immersion when it factors as a closed immersion into an open subscheme of its target; such a factorization is a device exhibiting the morphism, not extra data, and restricting the target to a smaller open subscheme containing the image does not change the property. (Immersion of schemes)

[F3]

A morphism i:Z→X of schemes is a closed immersion if and only if its restriction i−1(Vj)→Vj is a closed immersion for every member Vj of an open cover of X. (Closed immersions are local on the target)

[F4]

Let A→B and A→C be maps of commutative unital rings, allowing the zero ring. Then Spec⁡B×Spec⁡ASpec⁡C≅Spec⁡(B⊗AC), with the projections given by b↦b⊗1 and c↦1⊗c. (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products)

[F5]

For a ring A, closed immersions Z→Spec⁡A are, up to unique isomorphism over Spec⁡A, precisely the morphisms Spec⁡(A/I)→Spec⁡A for ideals I⊆A. (Closed immersions into affine schemes are quotient spectra)

[F6]

If opens V⊆X, W⊆Y of an S-scheme diagram map into an open U⊆S, then pr⁡1−1(V)∩pr⁡2−1(W) is an open subscheme of X×SY representing V×UW. (Restricting fibre products to open subschemes)

[F7]

Points of P=X×SY for S-schemes X,Y are in bijection with quadruples (x,y,s,r) where x∈X, y∈Y have image s∈S and r∈Spec⁡(κ(x)⊗κ(s)κ(y)); the residue field at the point is canonically κ(r), and the two projections of the quadruple are the contractions x,y of r along the two tensor inclusions. (Points of a fibre product via residue-field tensors)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose an open cover X=⋃iUi with Ui=Spec⁡Bi affine and f(Ui)⊆Vi=Spec⁡Ai affine, and put Qi=pr⁡1−1(Ui)∩pr⁡2−1(Ui). By [F6] the open subscheme Qi represents Ui×ViUi, so [F4] identifies Qi with Spec⁡(Bi⊗AiBi), an open subscheme of X×SX.

F4F6given
1.2

For each x∈X, choose i with x∈Ui. Since both projections of ΔX/S(x) are x by [F1], this point lies in Qi. Thus ΔX/S(X)⊆Q:=⋃iQi.

F1given
1.3

If z=ΔX/S(x), then pr⁡1(z)=pr⁡2(z)=x by [F1], and the residue-field map induced by either projection is the inverse of the isomorphism induced by ΔX/S, because the composites pr⁡jΔX/S=id⁡X induce identity maps on residue fields; in particular the two projections induce the same map κ(x)→κ(z).

F1given
2.1

Each Qi is open by step 1.1, so Q is an open subscheme of X×SX containing the image of ΔX/S by step 1.2.

step 1.1step 1.2
2.2

The inverse image ΔX/S−1(Qi) equals Ui, and the restricted morphism Ui→Qi is, under the identifications of step 1.1, the morphism Spec⁡Bi→Spec⁡(Bi⊗AiBi) corresponding to the multiplication map mi:Bi⊗AiBi→Bi, b⊗b′↦bb′. This mi is surjective, since b=mi(b⊗1), and then [F5] exhibits the restricted morphism as a closed immersion; the cases Bi=0 and Ai=0 of the zero ring are included, with mi again surjective. Consequently ΔX/S−1(Q)=⋃iΔX/S−1(Qi)=X.

F4F5step 1.1
2.3

Conversely let z satisfy pr⁡1(z)=pr⁡2(z)=x with a common induced residue map ψ:κ(x)→κ(z). By [F7] the point z corresponds to a quadruple (x,x,s,r) with κ(z)=κ(r), and the ring map φ:κ(x)⊗κ(s)κ(x)→κ(z) with kernel r restricts to ψ on each tensor factor. Since these restrictions agree, the universal property of the tensor product factors φ through the multiplication κ(x)⊗κ(s)κ(x)→κ(x), whose kernel m0 is therefore contained in r. That multiplication maps onto the field κ(x), so m0 is maximal and proper, and the prime r containing it is equal to it. By step 1.3 the point ΔX/S(x) is the point of the product whose quadruple is (x,x,s,m0), so injectivity of the bijection of [F7] gives z=ΔX/S(x).

F7step 1.3
3.1

Steps 1.2 and 2.1 show that the open subscheme Q of X×SX contains ΔX/S(X), and step 2.2 gives ΔX/S−1(Q)=X and shows that the restriction of ΔX/S to each member of the open cover {Qi} of Q is a closed immersion. By [F3] the morphism ΔX/S:X→Q is a closed immersion.

F3step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

Composing the closed immersion ΔX/S:X→Q of step 3.1 with the open immersion Q↪X×SX exhibits ΔX/S as an immersion by [F2]; explicitly, X is identified with the closed subscheme ΔX/S(X) of Q, cut out on the chart Qi by the kernel of mi of step 2.2.

F2step 2.2step 3.1
5.1

Steps 4.1 and 2.3 prove that ΔX/S is an immersion and that a point of X×SX lies in its image exactly when the two projections carry it to one point x of X and induce one and the same map κ(x)→κ(z).

step 4.1step 2.3∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources