How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every scheme diagonal is an immersion
Statement
For every morphism of schemes , the diagonal is an immersion (Immersion of schemes). It identifies with a locally closed subscheme of . A point of lies in its image if and only if the two projections carry to one and the same point of and induce one and the same map of residue fields .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A morphism of schemes , its diagonal and the projections .
The diagonal morphism is the unique with . (The diagonal morphism)
A morphism is an immersion when it factors as a closed immersion into an open subscheme of its target; such a factorization is a device exhibiting the morphism, not extra data, and restricting the target to a smaller open subscheme containing the image does not change the property. (Immersion of schemes)
A morphism of schemes is a closed immersion if and only if its restriction is a closed immersion for every member of an open cover of . (Closed immersions are local on the target)
Let and be maps of commutative unital rings, allowing the zero ring. Then , with the projections given by and . (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products)
For a ring , closed immersions are, up to unique isomorphism over , precisely the morphisms for ideals . (Closed immersions into affine schemes are quotient spectra)
If opens , of an -scheme diagram map into an open , then is an open subscheme of representing . (Restricting fibre products to open subschemes)
Points of for -schemes are in bijection with quadruples where , have image and ; the residue field at the point is canonically , and the two projections of the quadruple are the contractions of along the two tensor inclusions. (Points of a fibre product via residue-field tensors)
Proof
Choose an open cover with affine and affine, and put . By [F6] the open subscheme represents , so [F4] identifies with , an open subscheme of .
For each , choose with . Since both projections of are by [F1], this point lies in . Thus .
If , then by [F1], and the residue-field map induced by either projection is the inverse of the isomorphism induced by , because the composites induce identity maps on residue fields; in particular the two projections induce the same map .
Each is open by step 1.1, so is an open subscheme of containing the image of by step 1.2.
The inverse image equals , and the restricted morphism is, under the identifications of step 1.1, the morphism corresponding to the multiplication map , . This is surjective, since , and then [F5] exhibits the restricted morphism as a closed immersion; the cases and of the zero ring are included, with again surjective. Consequently .
Conversely let satisfy with a common induced residue map . By [F7] the point corresponds to a quadruple with , and the ring map with kernel restricts to on each tensor factor. Since these restrictions agree, the universal property of the tensor product factors through the multiplication , whose kernel is therefore contained in . That multiplication maps onto the field , so is maximal and proper, and the prime containing it is equal to it. By step 1.3 the point is the point of the product whose quadruple is , so injectivity of the bijection of [F7] gives .
Steps 1.2 and 2.1 show that the open subscheme of contains , and step 2.2 gives and shows that the restriction of to each member of the open cover of is a closed immersion. By [F3] the morphism is a closed immersion.
Composing the closed immersion of step 3.1 with the open immersion exhibits as an immersion by [F2]; explicitly, is identified with the closed subscheme of , cut out on the chart by the kernel of of step 2.2.
Steps 4.1 and 2.3 prove that is an immersion and that a point of lies in its image exactly when the two projections carry it to one point of and induce one and the same map .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Schemes, Lemmas 26.21.1-2 and Section 26.10, printed pp.35, 18 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vakil, The Rising Sea, Sections 11.3.1-2, printed pp.306-307 (standard reference, not scraped)