Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Homogeneous spaces of smooth affine groups are separated schemes

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let G be a smooth affine group scheme of finite type over k (Smooth morphism of schemes) and let H⊆G be a closed subgroup scheme (Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes). Then the fppf quotient sheaf G/H (Quotient sheaves and representable quotients for pre-relations and group actions) is representable by a separated k-scheme of finite type, unique up to unique isomorphism, and the quotient morphism G→G/H is faithfully flat and locally of finite presentation. Moreover there are a finite-dimensional k-vector space V, a rational representation r:G→GL⁡V (Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme) and a line L⊆V with scheme-theoretic line stabilizer H, such that G/H is isomorphic to the orbit O[L] of [L] under the induced action on Plines(V)=P(V∨) (A linear representation induces an action on projective space with the same line stabilizers) and the resulting morphism G/H→Plines(V) is an immersion (Immersion of schemes). In particular G/H is separated and finite type over k, and no smoothness of H is required. The Axiom of Choice is used through the generic-flatness, constructibility and Chevalley inputs cited in the proof.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a field k, a smooth affine finite-type k-group scheme G, and a closed subgroup scheme H⊆G.

[F1]

Chevalley's line-stabilizer theorem: there are a finite-dimensional rational representation V of G and a line L⊆V with H(R)={g∈G(R):gLR=LR} for every k-algebra R, with no smoothness of H (Every subgroup scheme of an affine group is a line stabilizer, Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme).

[F2]

A rational representation induces an action of G on Plines(V)=P(V∨), and the scheme-theoretic stabilizer of [L] has R-points exactly {g:r(g)LR=LR} (A linear representation induces an action on projective space with the same line stabilizers, Fibres of the orbit map and the scheme-theoretic stabilizer as a closed subgroup scheme).

[F3]

For smooth G the orbit subscheme Ox of a point x with a k-point is locally closed and smooth over k and ϱx:G→Ox is faithfully flat and locally of finite presentation (Smooth orbits are locally closed and their orbit maps are faithfully flat over every field).

[F4]

A faithfully flat orbit map representing a coset quotient: if H=Gx and ϱx:G→Ox is faithfully flat and locally of finite presentation, then Ox represents the fppf quotient sheaf G/H and G×kH→G×OxG is an isomorphism (A faithfully flat orbit map represents the coset quotient sheaf, Criterion for a scheme to represent an fppf quotient sheaf).

[F5]

The projective space P(V∨) is separated and of finite type over k (The relative projective-space diagonal is closed, Projective bundle in the quotient convention, Separated S-scheme); an immersion is separated, and a locally closed subscheme of a separated finite-type k-scheme is itself separated and finite type over k, since its diagonal is the base change of the ambient closed diagonal along the product of the immersion (Open and closed immersions are separated, Base change of immersions, Separated morphism of schemes).

Proof

Given: AC, the field k, the smooth affine finite-type k-group scheme G, and the closed subgroup scheme H⊆G.

1.1F1givenconstruct

By Chevalley's theorem [F1] there are a finite-dimensional rational representation r of G on V and a line L⊆V such that H(R)={g∈G(R):r(g)LR=LR} for every k-algebra R.

1.2F2F3given

Since G is smooth, the orbit lemma [F3] applies to the action of [F2] on Plines(V): the orbit O[L] is locally closed and stable under G, it is smooth over k, and ϱ[L]:G→O[L] is faithfully flat and locally of finite presentation.

2.1F2step 1.1givenalgebra

The projective action of [F2] has scheme-theoretic stabilizer G[L] with G[L](R)={g:r(g)LR=LR} for every k-algebra R, which is H(R) by step 1.1; hence G[L]=H as closed subgroup schemes of G.

2.2F5step 1.2given

The orbit O[L] is a locally closed subscheme of the separated finite-type k-scheme Plines(V), so it is separated and finite type over k by [F5], and the morphism O[L]↪Plines(V) is an immersion.

3.1F4step 1.2step 2.1given

Applying the coset-quotient proposition [F4] with x=[L], H=G[L] and the faithfully flat orbit map of step 1.2 shows that O[L] represents the fppf quotient sheaf G/H, with quotient morphism ϱ[L] faithfully flat and locally of finite presentation, and that G×kH≅G×O[L]G.

4.1step 1.1step 2.2step 3.1given∎

By steps 2.2 and 3.1 the quotient G/H is represented by the separated finite-type k-scheme O[L], with quotient morphism ϱ[L], and the morphism G/H≅O[L]↪Plines(V) is an immersion; the representation and line of step 1.1 satisfy the stated requirement that the scheme-theoretic line stabilizer is H. Any other representing scheme is uniquely isomorphic by the Yoneda lemma applied to a natural isomorphism of the represented functors. No smoothness of H was used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

98 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources