How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homogeneous spaces of smooth affine groups are separated schemes
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a field, let be a smooth affine group scheme of finite type over (Smooth morphism of schemes) and let be a closed subgroup scheme (Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes). Then the fppf quotient sheaf (Quotient sheaves and representable quotients for pre-relations and group actions) is representable by a separated -scheme of finite type, unique up to unique isomorphism, and the quotient morphism is faithfully flat and locally of finite presentation. Moreover there are a finite-dimensional -vector space , a rational representation (Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme) and a line with scheme-theoretic line stabilizer , such that is isomorphic to the orbit of under the induced action on (A linear representation induces an action on projective space with the same line stabilizers) and the resulting morphism is an immersion (Immersion of schemes). In particular is separated and finite type over , and no smoothness of is required. The Axiom of Choice is used through the generic-flatness, constructibility and Chevalley inputs cited in the proof.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a field , a smooth affine finite-type -group scheme , and a closed subgroup scheme .
Chevalley's line-stabilizer theorem: there are a finite-dimensional rational representation of and a line with for every -algebra , with no smoothness of (Every subgroup scheme of an affine group is a line stabilizer, Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme).
A rational representation induces an action of on , and the scheme-theoretic stabilizer of has -points exactly (A linear representation induces an action on projective space with the same line stabilizers, Fibres of the orbit map and the scheme-theoretic stabilizer as a closed subgroup scheme).
For smooth the orbit subscheme of a point with a -point is locally closed and smooth over and is faithfully flat and locally of finite presentation (Smooth orbits are locally closed and their orbit maps are faithfully flat over every field).
A faithfully flat orbit map representing a coset quotient: if and is faithfully flat and locally of finite presentation, then represents the fppf quotient sheaf and is an isomorphism (A faithfully flat orbit map represents the coset quotient sheaf, Criterion for a scheme to represent an fppf quotient sheaf).
The projective space is separated and of finite type over (The relative projective-space diagonal is closed, Projective bundle in the quotient convention, Separated S-scheme); an immersion is separated, and a locally closed subscheme of a separated finite-type -scheme is itself separated and finite type over , since its diagonal is the base change of the ambient closed diagonal along the product of the immersion (Open and closed immersions are separated, Base change of immersions, Separated morphism of schemes).
Proof
Given: AC, the field , the smooth affine finite-type -group scheme , and the closed subgroup scheme .
By Chevalley's theorem [F1] there are a finite-dimensional rational representation of on and a line such that for every -algebra .
Since is smooth, the orbit lemma [F3] applies to the action of [F2] on : the orbit is locally closed and stable under , it is smooth over , and is faithfully flat and locally of finite presentation.
The projective action of [F2] has scheme-theoretic stabilizer with for every -algebra , which is by step 1.1; hence as closed subgroup schemes of .
The orbit is a locally closed subscheme of the separated finite-type -scheme , so it is separated and finite type over by [F5], and the morphism is an immersion.
Applying the coset-quotient proposition [F4] with , and the faithfully flat orbit map of step 1.2 shows that represents the fppf quotient sheaf , with quotient morphism faithfully flat and locally of finite presentation, and that .
By steps 2.2 and 3.1 the quotient is represented by the separated finite-type -scheme , with quotient morphism , and the morphism is an immersion; the representation and line of step 1.1 satisfy the stated requirement that the scheme-theoretic line stabilizer is . Any other representing scheme is uniquely isomorphic by the Yoneda lemma applied to a natural isomorphism of the represented functors. No smoothness of was used.
Depends on
- Algebraic group actions, orbit maps, orbit subschemes and scheme-theoretic stabilizers
- The Axiom of Choice
- Immersion of schemes
- Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes
- Projective bundle in the quotient convention
- Quotient sheaves and representable quotients for pre-relations and group actions
- Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme
- Separated morphism of schemes
- Separated S-scheme
- Smooth morphism of schemes
- Fibres of the orbit map and the scheme-theoretic stabilizer as a closed subgroup scheme
- Base change of immersions
- Criterion for a scheme to represent an fppf quotient sheaf
- Smooth orbits are locally closed and their orbit maps are faithfully flat over every field
- A linear representation induces an action on projective space with the same line stabilizers
- The relative projective-space diagonal is closed
- Open and closed immersions are separated
- A faithfully flat orbit map represents the coset quotient sheaf
- Every subgroup scheme of an affine group is a line stabilizer
Used by
- Parabolic subgroups of an affine algebraic group Definition
- Borel subgroups of GLₙ are flag stabilizers and act on projective space with a fixed line Example
- The quotient of GL2 by the diagonal torus is the complement of the diagonal in P1 x P1 Example
- Cartan subgroups: conjugacy, density and normalizers Lemma
- Connected groups of rank zero are unipotent Lemma
- Fixed loci and centralizers of torus actions are connected Lemma
- Homogeneous curves and automorphisms of P¹ Lemma
- Structure of SL₂ and root coordinates Lemma
- Orbit sets, fppf quotient sheaves and representing schemes are three different objects Remark
- Borel fixed point theorem for complete schemes Theorem
- Chevalley's centralizer theorem and reductive centralizers Theorem
- Classification of split reductive groups of semisimple rank one Theorem
- Conjugacy of Borel subgroups and of maximal tori over an algebraically closed field Theorem
- Solvable subgroups, the radical, and the Borel intersection Theorem
- The quotient of a connected group by a Borel subgroup of maximal dimension is complete Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
98 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michel Brion, Introduction to actions of algebraic groups, Les cours du CIRM 1 (2010), no. 1, 1-22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Groupoid Schemes, Sections 39.20 and 39.23 (tags 02VG, 03BD, 03C5, 03BM, 03BE) (standard reference, not scraped)