Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every subgroup scheme of an affine group is a line stabilizer

Statement

Let G be an affine finite-type group scheme over a field k and H⊆G any closed subgroup scheme. There is a finite-dimensional representation V of G and a line L⊆V whose scheme-theoretic stabilizer equals H: for every k-algebra R, H(R)={g∈G(R):gLR=LR}. No smoothness assumption is required.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Every coordinate-Hopf-algebra comodule is a union of finite-dimensional subcomodules. (Affine finite-type group schemes have faithful finite-dimensional representations)

[F2]

A finite-type algebra over a field is Noetherian. (Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring)

Proof

Given: G, its coordinate Hopf algebra A, and the Hopf ideal I=ker⁡(A→k[H]).

1.1F1F2givenconstructalgebra

Choose finitely many ideal generators of I by [F2], and a finite-dimensional right-regular subcomodule V⊂A containing them by [F1]. Set W=I∩V. Choose a basis (ej)j∈J of W and extend it to (ei)i∈J⊔K of V. Write Δ(ej)=∑iei⊗aij. The stabilizer of W is cut out by aij for j∈J,i∈K. Indeed these equations say the lower-left matrix block is zero; an invertible block upper triangular matrix over any commutative R has both diagonal blocks invertible, since their determinants have invertible product. Thus inclusion gWR⊂WR gives equality.

2.1step 1.1algebra

Because I is a Hopf ideal, Δ(I)⊂I⊗A+A⊗I and ϵ(I)=0. In V⊗A, the first condition says that all the displayed aij with i∈K,j∈J belong to I: project the first factor into A/I, where the images of the ei for i∈K are independent. Conversely the counit identity gives ej=∑i∈Kϵ(ei)aij for j∈J. Since the ej span a space containing the ideal generators of I, those matrix entries generate I. The stabilizer is therefore exactly H as a closed scheme.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1constructalgebra∎

Put d=dim⁡W and L=⋀dW⊂⋀dV. This is a line, including d=0. For a basis e1,…,ed of W let w=e1∧⋯∧ed. Over every R, WR={v∈VR:w∧v=0}, by expanding v in a basis extending that of W. If an automorphism g stabilizes LR, then (⋀dg)w=cw for a unit c∈R; applying ⋀d+1g to w∧v shows gWR⊂WR, and applying g−1 gives equality. The converse follows by taking determinants on WR. Thus the line stabilizer equals the subspace stabilizer from step 2.1, completing the proof on every algebra.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources