Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every normal subgroup of an affine group is a representation kernel

Statement

Assume AC. Over any field k, every closed normal subgroup scheme N of an affine finite-type k-group scheme G is the scheme-theoretic kernel of a finite-dimensional representation G→GL⁡(E). Neither group scheme is assumed smooth.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A closed subgroup scheme of an affine group is the stabilizer of a line in a finite-dimensional representation, on all algebras. (Every subgroup scheme of an affine group is a line stabilizer)

[F2]

Over an algebraically closed field, if a character χ of a normal subgroup occurs in a group representation, so does χ−m for some m>0. (A character of a normal subgroup admits an inverse multiple in a group representation)

[F3]

Algebraic closures exist under AC and finite-type coordinate rings are Noetherian. (Assuming Choice, every field has an algebraic closure, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring)

Proof

Given: AC, k, G and N as in the statement.

1.1F1F2constructalgebra

First let k be algebraically closed. Choose by [F1] a representation V and a line L with stabilizer N. The action of N on L is a character χ. By [F2], some representation V′ contains a nonzero N-weight subspace D of character χ−m. The subspace T=L⊗m⊗D⊂V⊗m⊗V′ has stabilizer exactly N. To see this on any algebra R, suppose an automorphism in each factor preserves WR⊗DR, with W,D nonzero subspaces. For a transformed basis vector u of WR and a transformed basis vector d of DR, project u⊗d to (VR/WR)⊗VR′. It is zero. The vector d is unimodular because it is part of a transformed basis, so contracting with a functional taking d to 1 gives u mod WR=0. Interchanging the factors gives preservation of DR, and applying the inverse gives equality of both submodules. Thus the tensor-subspace stabilizer is the intersection of the factor stabilizers. Likewise, the tensor line LR⊗m determines LR: for a unimodular generator u of a transformed line choose a functional with value 1 on u, and contract u⊗m in all but one slot after projecting the remaining slot to VR/LR. Thus its stabilizer is the stabilizer of LR. Since N stabilizes D, the claimed intersection is exactly N. The action of N on T is trivial, since the characters cancel.

2.1F1step 1.1constructalgebra

Taking the top exterior power of T and of its ambient representation gives a line L0 with stabilizer N, by the wedge calculation in [F1], and N acts trivially on L0. Write B for this ambient representation and BN for the kernel of the linear map b↦ρN(b)−b⊗1 into B⊗k[N]. Tensoring this kernel with every k-algebra R preserves it, since all k-modules are flat. Thus BN⊗R is exactly the vectors fixed by every N-point after every further algebra extension: the universal point of N tests the coaction equality. Normality makes this space G-stable. Indeed, for g∈G(R), v∈BN⊗R and n∈N(R′), where R′ is any R-algebra, n(gv)=g(g−1ng)v=gv. The representation on BN has kernel containing N. Its kernel fixes L0⊂BN, hence is contained in the line stabilizer N. These inclusions hold on all algebras, so its scheme-theoretic kernel equals N.

3.1F3step 2.1constructalgebra

For arbitrary k, extend to an algebraic closure kˉ by [F3] and apply steps 1.1–2.1 there. The resulting representation is given by finitely many matrix coefficients in kˉ⊗kk[G], its inverse determinant and the finitely many relations expressing its group identities. All coefficient scalars lie in a finite subextension K/k. Equality of its kernel ideal with IN⊗kˉ can also be descended to a finite such extension: the representation-kernel ideal is generated by its matrix coefficients minus those of the identity; IN has a finite generating set by [F3]; expressing each set of generators in terms of the other uses only finitely many additional scalars. Enlarge K to contain them. The representation on Kn then exists over K, its group identities hold by injectivity of k[G]⊗K→k[G]⊗kˉ and its tensor square, and its kernel is exactly NK. This argument permits inseparable K/k.

4.1step 3.1constructalgebra∎

Let E be the underlying k-vector space of Kn. For every k-algebra R, extend g∈G(R) to G(K⊗kR) and apply the K-representation from step 3.1. This gives an invertible R-linear map on E⊗kR and hence a representation of G on E: choosing a k-basis of K expresses its entries as regular k[G]-functions, and multiplication and inversion follow from the K-representation. This automorphism is the identity precisely when g extended to K⊗R lies in N(K⊗R). Since R→K⊗R is faithfully flat, it is injective, and the vanishing of every generator of IN after this extension is equivalent to its vanishing in R. Thus the kernel on R-points is N(R) for every R, proving the scheme assertion. AC is used through [F2] and [F3].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources