Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Connected finite-type groups are geometrically connected

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. A connected separated finite-type k-group scheme is geometrically connected. A smooth connected such group is geometrically integral. Every geometrically reduced finite-type k-group scheme is smooth.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Global sections commute with field extension; separable closures exist, and a finite Galois extension has the ground field as its fixed field. (Global sections commute with extension of scalars over a field, Assuming Choice, separable closures exist and are base-isomorphic, The fundamental theorem of finite Galois theory)

[F2]

Over a perfect field, reduced finite-type varieties have regular points, regularity equals smoothness, and the smooth locus is open. Geometric regularity descends from field extension, and nonempty finite-type schemes over an algebraically closed field have rational closed points. (Dense regular loci on every component, Regular equals smooth over a perfect field, The smooth locus is open, Field tests for geometric regularity, Over an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal)

Proof

Given: AC and a connected finite-type group scheme G/k.

1.1F1givenalgebrachoose

In an algebraic closure kˉ, the connected component of the identity in Gkˉ is nonempty and open and closed: a Noetherian space has finitely many connected components. Its characteristic idempotent e∈Γ(Gkˉ,O) belongs to Γ(G,O)⊗kkˉ by [F1]. It is already defined over a separable closure ks. Indeed kˉ/ks is purely inseparable; its finitely many coefficient elements belong to a finite extension with some pr-powers in ks. Since an idempotent satisfies epr=e, the expansion of that power puts it in Γ(G,O)⊗kks. In characteristic zero the assertion is immediate. Choose a finite Galois K/k inside ks containing its coefficients. Each Galois automorphism fixes the identity and therefore preserves this unique geometric connected component and its idempotent. Writing e in finitely many linearly independent coefficients from Γ(G,O) shows its K-coefficients are Galois fixed and lie in k by [F1]. Hence the idempotent descends to G, which is connected, and must be 1. Thus Gkˉ is connected.

1.2F2constructalgebra

If a finite-type group is geometrically reduced, over kˉ its reduced group has a smooth point by [F2]. Translate that point to the identity and then to every rational closed point. All closed points are smooth. The nonsmooth locus is closed and, if nonempty, has a closed point by [F2], so it is empty. By geometric-regularity descent in [F2], the group is smooth over k. This proof does not assume affineness. For the reduction of an arbitrary group over kˉ, multiplication and inverse restrict to it: the pullback of a nilpotent ideal vanishes on a reduced source, and products of reduced finite-type schemes over the perfect field are reduced. Thus its reduction is again a group to which the same argument applies.

2.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

If G is smooth and connected, its geometric base extension is smooth, reduced, and connected by step 1.1. At a smooth point the local ring is a regular domain, so two different irreducible components cannot meet. The finitely many components are open and closed, and connectedness leaves one; hence the geometric scheme is integral. This proves geometric integrality. AC is inherited from [F1]–[F2].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

90 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources