How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Global sections commute with extension of scalars over a field
Statement
Let be a quasi-compact separated scheme over a field and a -algebra. Then the natural map is an isomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Affine products over are spectra of tensor products, and global sections of an affine scheme recover its ring. (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products, Global functions on Spec A recover A)
Separatedness means the diagonal is a closed immersion. (Separated morphism of schemes)
Proof
Given: , , and as in the statement.
Choose a finite affine open cover , using quasi-compactness. Each is affine: it is the inverse image of the closed diagonal under , hence a closed subscheme of an affine scheme. The sheaf gluing axiom gives an exact sequence beginning with , where the last arrow takes differences of restrictions.
Every -module is a vector space and is flat: a short exact sequence of vector spaces splits by extending a basis, so tensoring with any vector space preserves its exactness. In the particular equalizer in step 1.1 this can also be checked using the finitely many linearly independent coefficients of each tensor, with only finite basis selections. Tensor that equalizer with . Finite products commute with this tensor product. By [F1] the resulting rings are precisely the rings of the affine opens and their intersections. Their equalizer is the global-section ring of by the same sheaf gluing axiom. This identifies the natural map in the statement with an isomorphism. The coefficient argument uses no arbitrary basis choice.
Depends on
Used by
- Affineness and properness descend under finite purely inseparable scalar extension Lemma
- Ampleness of a given line bundle descends under field extension Lemma
- Connected finite-type groups are geometrically connected Lemma
- Finite-type algebraic group monomorphisms are closed immersions Lemma
- Rigidity for a proper geometrically integral factor Lemma
- Rigidity for an integral factor with only constant functions Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes, flat base change for H0 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Milne, Algebraic Groups (2022), Appendix A, global sections and base extension (standard reference, not scraped)