Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rigidity for an integral factor with only constant functions

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be algebraically closed and X,Y integral separated finite-type k-schemes with rational points x0,y0. Suppose Γ(X,OX)=k. For every morphism f:X×Y→Z to a separated finite-type k-scheme which is constant on X×{y0}, one has f=f(x0,−)∘pr⁡Y.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Global sections commute with scalar extension by any k-algebra, and morphisms to affine schemes are determined by these ring maps. (Global sections commute with extension of scalars over a field, Morphisms to an affine scheme and global sections)

[F2]

In a Noetherian local ring, the intersection of the powers of any ideal contained in the maximal ideal is zero. (The Krull intersection is the (1−a)-torsion submodule, and it vanishes in the Jacobson-radical case)

Proof

Given: AC, k, X,Y,Z,f,x0,y0 as above, and z0=f(x0,y0).

1.1F1givenconstructalgebra

Let Yn=Spec⁡(OY,y0/my0n+1) and define Zn similarly at z0. Constancy on the original fibre says the ideal of z0 pulls back into the ideal of X×{y0}; its (n+1)st power pulls back into the corresponding power. Thus f restricts to fn:X×Yn→Zn. These finite infinitesimal neighbourhoods are affine. By [F1] and the constant-function hypothesis, Γ(X×Yn,O)=Γ(Yn,O). Hence fn factors through Yn, and evaluation at x0 identifies the factor with f(x0,−)∣Yn.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

Let E be the closed equalizer of f and f(x0,−)∘pr⁡Y, using the closed diagonal of Z. Step 1.1 says E contains X×Yn for every n. In the Noetherian local ring of X×Y at (x0,y0), the equalizer ideal is therefore contained in every power of the ideal generated by my0. That ideal is contained in the local maximal ideal, so [F2] says the equalizer ideal is zero there. Since the ideal sheaf is coherent, E contains an open neighbourhood of (x0,y0). The product of integral varieties over the algebraically closed field is integral; an ideal on it vanishing on a nonempty open is zero, since it injects into the rational function field on every affine chart. Thus E=X×Y, giving the claimed identity. AC is inherited from [F2] and the integral-variety suppliers.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources