How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Affineness and properness descend under finite purely inseparable scalar extension
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be finite purely inseparable, and a separated finite-type -scheme. If is affine, then is affine. If is proper over , then is proper over .
Facts & Assumptions
Global sections of a quasi-compact separated scheme commute with extension of scalars over a field. (Global sections commute with extension of scalars over a field)
Faithfully flat tensor extension detects zero modules. Morphisms into affine schemes correspond to maps on global sections. (Descent of vanishing along a faithfully flat morphism, Morphisms to an affine scheme and global sections)
Properness is finite type, separatedness, and universal closedness. (Proper morphisms)
Proof
Given: AC, a finite purely inseparable , and as above.
The projection is finite faithfully flat and a universal homeomorphism. On an affine chart its ring map is finite free; after extending any residue field the spectrum of the purely inseparable tensor extension has exactly one point, since each element of has some -power in . It is therefore radicial and onto, and a finite onto map is closed, including after every base change. If is a local -algebra, is local: its finite integral extension has a unique prime over the maximal ideal, and every maximal ideal lies over that ideal. Thus the stalk at the unique point above is .
Assume affine and set . By [F1] and [F2], the canonical map becomes the canonical affine isomorphism . By step 1.1 the two scalar-extension projections are homeomorphisms, so is a homeomorphism. On each stalk the map induced by becomes an isomorphism after tensoring with , by the stalk description in step 1.1. Tensoring is exact and faithfully flat, so its kernel and cokernel vanish by [F2]. Thus is an isomorphism of locally ringed spaces and of schemes; is affine.
Assume instead proper. For an arbitrary -scheme and closed subset , its inverse image in is closed. Its image in is closed by properness of , and its image under the finite closed surjection is exactly the image of in . Thus is universally closed. Finite type and separatedness were given, so [F3] proves properness. AC is inherited from the scheme/global-section suppliers; no Galois action is assumed for the inseparable extension.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Brion, Some structure theorems for algebraic groups, Lemma 4.3.5 and Theorem 4.3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Descent, properties of schemes under field extension (standard reference, not scraped)