Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Morphisms descend under a finite field extension with the full descent identity

Statement

Let K/k be a finite field extension, not necessarily separable, and let X,Z be k-schemes. A K-morphism f:XK→ZK comes from a unique k-morphism X→Z if and only if its two base extensions over K⊗kK agree under the canonical identifications. This is the full descent identity, not just invariance under automorphisms of K/k.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Affine products have tensor-product coordinate rings. Morphisms into affine schemes correspond to maps on global sections. (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products, Morphisms to an affine scheme and global sections)

Proof

Given: K/k, X, Z, and a morphism f with the stated descent identity.

1.1F1algebrachoose

For any k-algebra A, the sequence A→A⊗kK⇉A⊗kK⊗kK is an equalizer. Choose a k-linear map ϵ:K→k with ϵ(1)=1, by extending 1 to a finite basis. If the two images of b∈A⊗K agree, applying ϵ to the first of the two field factors gives b=a⊗1, where a=(1⊗ϵ)b. Conversely such elements have equal images. The first map is injective by the same retraction.

1.2givenalgebraconstruct

The projection p:XK→X is finite faithfully flat, hence closed and onto. If two points of XK lie over the same point x, they lift to a common point of XK×XXK: their residue-field tensor product over κ(x) is nonzero, so has a prime. Let V⊂Z be affine. The descent identity implies that W=f−1(VK) has the same inverse images under the two relation projections, so membership in W is constant over the entire fibre of p. Thus U=X∖p(XK∖W) is open and W=p−1(U). These U cover X as V ranges over an affine cover of Z. Finiteness makes p closed by lying-over after quotienting an integral affine coordinate extension.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2construct∎

On an affine open T=Spec⁡A⊂U, write V=Spec⁡B. By [F1] the morphism corresponds to a map B⊗K→A⊗K. Its restriction to B has equal images in A⊗K⊗K by the descent identity, so step 1.1 puts its image in A. This gives a unique k-morphism T→V with the required scalar extension. On overlaps the two descended maps agree: preimages of original affine target opens are the descended opens just constructed, and equality of the ring maps is detected by the injective map A→A⊗K on any affine source chart. They glue to the desired morphism. Uniqueness follows from the same detection argument, and every base extension satisfies the descent identity. Only finite basis choices were used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources