How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Morphisms descend under a finite field extension with the full descent identity
Statement
Let be a finite field extension, not necessarily separable, and let be -schemes. A -morphism comes from a unique -morphism if and only if its two base extensions over agree under the canonical identifications. This is the full descent identity, not just invariance under automorphisms of .
Facts & Assumptions
Affine products have tensor-product coordinate rings. Morphisms into affine schemes correspond to maps on global sections. (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products, Morphisms to an affine scheme and global sections)
Proof
Given: , , , and a morphism with the stated descent identity.
For any -algebra , the sequence is an equalizer. Choose a -linear map with , by extending to a finite basis. If the two images of agree, applying to the first of the two field factors gives , where . Conversely such elements have equal images. The first map is injective by the same retraction.
The projection is finite faithfully flat, hence closed and onto. If two points of lie over the same point , they lift to a common point of : their residue-field tensor product over is nonzero, so has a prime. Let be affine. The descent identity implies that has the same inverse images under the two relation projections, so membership in is constant over the entire fibre of . Thus is open and . These cover as ranges over an affine cover of . Finiteness makes closed by lying-over after quotienting an integral affine coordinate extension.
On an affine open , write . By [F1] the morphism corresponds to a map . Its restriction to has equal images in by the descent identity, so step 1.1 puts its image in . This gives a unique -morphism with the required scalar extension. On overlaps the two descended maps agree: preimages of original affine target opens are the descended opens just constructed, and equality of the ring maps is detected by the injective map on any affine source chart. They glue to the desired morphism. Uniqueness follows from the same detection argument, and every base extension satisfies the descent identity. Only finite basis choices were used.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Descent, descent of morphisms of schemes (standard reference, not scraped)
- SGA3, Expose VIA, 3.2.3 finite scalar descent (standard reference, not scraped)