Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rational maps from smooth varieties to abelian varieties extend

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Over every field, every rational map from a smooth integral finite-type variety to an abelian variety extends uniquely to a morphism on the whole variety.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A smooth variety is normal, since its regular local rings are normal. (regular local rings are normal)

[F2]

Rational maps from normal varieties to proper schemes extend at every codimension-one point. Rational maps from smooth integral varieties to separated groups over an algebraically closed field have either empty or divisorial indeterminacy. (A rational map from a normal variety to a proper variety extends in codimension one, Indeterminacy of a rational map to a group is divisorial)

[F4]

Morphisms descend uniquely under finite field extension when their two base extensions to the tensor-product field algebra agree; algebraic closures exist under AC. (Morphisms descend under a finite field extension with the full descent identity, Assuming Choice, every field has an algebraic closure)

[F3]

Abelian varieties are proper separated group varieties. (Abelian varieties over a field)

Proof

Given: AC, a field k, X smooth integral, A an abelian variety, and f:X⇢A.

1.1F1F2F3given

First suppose k is algebraically closed. By [F1] and the proper-target part of [F2], the complement of the maximal domain of f contains no codimension-one point. By [F3] and the group-target part of [F2], that complement would be a union of prime divisors if it were nonempty. These statements force it to be empty.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra

Thus the rational map is a morphism on all of X. Any two extensions agree on a dense open; their equalizer is closed since A is separated, and the integral reduced X admits no nonzero ideal vanishing on a dense open. They therefore agree everywhere.

3.1F1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1construct

For general k, extend to an algebraic closure kˉ using [F4]. Smoothness survives scalar extension. The finitely many irreducible components of Xkˉ are disjoint, because regular local rings are domains, so each is a smooth integral variety. The base extension of the original dense domain is schematically dense, by injectivity of scalar extension on the original affine coordinate rings, and meets each such component densely. The preceding argument on each component therefore gives morphisms which glue to g:Xkˉ→Akˉ extending fkˉ. It is defined over a finite extension K/k inside kˉ: cover its source by finitely many affine opens lying in inverse images of original affine target opens; the ideals defining these opens inside the finitely many original affine source charts, the coordinate images defining the morphisms, and the finitely many overlap relations all involve finitely many algebraic coefficients. Take K containing those coefficients. The resulting maps glue to gK:XK→AK; their restrictions agree with fK on its domain, since equality is reflected by the faithful extension K→kˉ.

4.1F1F3F4step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

The two base extensions of gK to K⊗kK agree on the base extension of the original dense domain of f. That open is schematically dense even over this possibly nonreduced tensor algebra: on each original affine chart, restriction from its integral coordinate ring to the rational-function field is injective, and tensoring by the k-vector space K⊗kK preserves injectivity. Therefore a section of the ideal of their closed equalizer which vanishes on that open is zero. Separatedness of A makes that equalizer closed, so the two morphisms agree everywhere. Apply [F4] to descend gK to a morphism X→A extending f. The uniqueness argument of step 2.1 works over k as well. AC is carried from the algebraic closure and regularity suppliers.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources